Elementary bonding rules

There is a connection between an orbital description of electronic structure and the more elementary bonding discussions such as those reviewed in the Appendix. In this section we describe the connection of the 8- and 18-electron rules in order to provide a basis for understanding how the cluster electron-counting rules emerge from and are connected to molecular orbital descriptions of cluster bonding. 

In Chap. 3 the elementary structure of the atom was introduced. The facts that protons, neutrons, and electrons are present in the atom and that electrons are arranged in shells allowed us to explain isotopes (Chap. 3), the octet rule for main group elements (Chap. 5), ionic and covalent bonding (Chap. 5), and much more. However, we still have not been able to deduce why the transition metal groups and inner transition metal groups arise, why many of the transition metals have ions of different charges, how the shapes of molecules are determined, and much more. In this chapter we introduce a more detailed description of the electronic structure of the atom which begins to answer some of these more difficult questions. 

One more reason for which chain reactions have an advantage over molecular reactions is the restrictions that are imposed on the elementary act by the quantum-chemical rule of conservation of symmetry of orbits of bonds, which undergo rearrangement in the reaction [4]. If this rule is applied, the reaction, even if it is exothermic, requires very high activation energy to occur. For example, the reaction... 

The BRC concept [99] allows the analysis of the elementary actions of chemical transformation at the level of active complexes, in which electron density is redistributed in accordance with bond multiplicity change. Generally, this is expressed by the rule of multiplicity alternating change ... 

A chemical reaction always involves bond-breaking/making processes or valence electron rearrangements, which can be characterized by the variation of VB structures. According to the resonance theory [1, 50], the evolution of a system in the elementary reaction process can be interpreted through the resonance among the correlated VB structures corresponding to reactant, product and some intermediate states. Because only symmetry-adapted VB structures can effectively resonate, all VB structures involved in the description of a reaction will thus retain the symmetry shared by both reactant and product states in the elementary process. Therefore, we postulate that the VB structures of the reactant and the product states for concerted reactions should preserve symmetry-adaptation, called the VB structure symmetry-adaptation (VBSSA) rule. 

A simple rule for the occurrence of trans-h A distorted structures 2 at homopolar double bonds was derived from an elementary molecular orbital model treating a-jt mixing and a valence bond treatment . The relation between the singlet-triplet separation (A st) of the constituent ER2 and a +jt bond energy Ea+ was used as a criterion for determining the expected structure of R2E=ER2. The trans-b ai geometry 2 occurs when l/AEa+ < A sT < l/2Ea+n- The first part of the inequality determines the irawi-bending distortion of the double bond, while the second part determines the existence of a direct E=E link. 

Diagrams purporting to show the origin of the electrons required for the various bonds are often given in elementary texts but only for (finite) molecules and complex ions-not for solids. It might help if Sidgwick-type formulae were given for solids such as SnS (in which each atom forms three bonds), if only to show that the rules which apply to finite systems also apply to some at least of the infinite arrays of atoms in crystals ... 

Some of the effects previously described are valuable for automatic RDF interpretation. In fact, this sensitivity is an elementary prerequisite in a rule base for descriptor interpretation. However, since many molecular properties are independent of the conformation, the sensitivity of RDF descriptors can be an undesired effect. Conformational changes occur through several effects, such as rotation, inversion, configuration interchange, or pseudo-rotation, and almost all of these effects occur more or less intensely in Cartesian RDF descriptors. If a descriptor needs to be insensitive to changes in the conformation of the molecule, bond-path descriptors or topological bond-path descriptors are more appropriate candidates. Figure 5.7 shows a comparison of the Cartesian and bond-path descriptors. 

In Chapter 1, we established some ground rules for writing plausible mechanisms (normally several) for particular reactions, based on the identification of bonds formed and broken in the reaction. In this chapter, we show how kinetics the study of how concentrations of reagents or products vary with time, enable us to rule out some potential mechanisms and provide insight into elementary and stepwise reactions. 

The formulas of the chemical compounds are no accident. There is an NaCl, but no NaCl2 there is a Cap2, but no CaF. On the other hand, certain pairs of elements form two, or even more, different compounds, e.g. C]u20, CuO N2O, NO, NO2. In the case of ionic compounds the relative number of positive and negative ions in a formula is governed simply by the rule of electrical neutrality. In covalent compounds, or within polyatomic ions (like NO ), structures are formed by covalent bonds (i.e., electron sharing). A hierarchy of covalent bonding theories exists, of which the simplest, the drawing of Lewis structures, is emphasized in this and in most elementary texts. 

The implication is that this is an elementary reaction involving a single reactant molecule. No other species appear to take part, which would seem to rule out the possibilities of collisions, and yet energy will certainly be required to break the C—Cl bond the reactant molecule will not simply fall apart of its own volition. 

The notable exception to the rule of close packing appears in covalent crystals in which the maximum stability is obtained, not with the greatest possible number of neighbors, but by forming the allowed number of covalent bonds in the proper directions. This requirement is peculiar to the individual substance so that a generalization of the kind embodied in the radius ratio rules is out of the question for covalent crystals. We cannot build up typical structures with the ease and confidence with which we stacked spheres into layers and layers one upon another. Rather than struggle with this host of individual problems, we will make only a few elementary remarks about the subject. 

---