Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic structure computations density functional tight-binding

The present chapter is structured as follows we will discuss the synthesis and formation mechanism of imogolites at Section 2, whereas Section 3 features the computational aspects of the approximate method Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional Tight-binding and its parameterization steps. The theoretical analysis for NT structures and stability will be presented at Section 4, followed by the electronic and mechanical properties at Section 5. Final remarks will be presented at Section 6. [Pg.153]

Under some simplifications associated with the symmetry of fullerenes, it has been possible to perform calculations of type Hartree-Fock in which the interelec-tronic correlation has been included up to second order Mpller-Plesset (Moller et al. 1934 Purcell 1979 Cioslowski 1995), and calculations based on the density functional (Pople et al. 1976). However, given the difficulties faced by ab initio computations when all the electrons of these large molecules are taken into account, other semiempirical methods of the Hiickel type or tight-binding (Haddon 1992) models have been developed to determine the electronic structure of C60 (Cioslowski 1995 Lin and Nori 1996) and associated properties like polarizabilities (Bonin and Kresin 1997 Rubio et al. 1993) hyperpolarizabilities (Fanti et al. 1995) plasmon excitations (Bertsch et al. 1991) etc. These semiempirical models reproduce the order of monoelectronic levels close to the Fermi level. Other more sophisticated semiempirical models, like the PPP (Pariser-Parr-Pople) (Pariser and Parr 1953 Pople 1953) obtain better quantitative results when compared with photoemission experiments (Savage 1975). [Pg.5]

Preliminary models of the surface topography, for example, can be determined by atomic-probe methods, ion-scattering, electron diffraction, or Auger spectroscopy. The chemical bonds of adsorbates can be estimated from infrared spectroscopy. The surface electronic structure is accessible by photoelectron emission techniques. In case the surface structure is known, its electronic structure has to be computed with sophisticated methods, where existing codes more and more rely on first principles density functional theory (DFT) [16-18], or, in case of tight-binding models [19], they obtain their parameters from a fit to DFT data [20]. The fit is not without ambiguities, since it is unknown whether the density of states used for the fit is really unique. [Pg.157]


See other pages where Electronic structure computations density functional tight-binding is mentioned: [Pg.283]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.2201]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.1352]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.130]   


SEARCH



Binding structure

Density Functional Tight Binding

Density electronic structures

Density, computation

Electron binding

Electron density function

Electron density functionals

Electron density structure

Electron functionalization

Electronic computer

Electronic density function

Electronic structure computation

Electronic structure tight binding

Structural density

Structure computation

Tight-binding

© 2024 chempedia.info