Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic shells, distribution

In PMD radicals, the bond orders are the same as those in the polymethines with the closed electron shell, insofar as the single occupied MO with its modes near atoms does not contribute to the bond orders. Also, an unpaired electron leads the electron density distribution to equalize. PMD radicals are characterized by a considerable alternation of spin density, which is confirmed by epr spectroscopy data (3,19,20). [Pg.491]

The arrangement of electrons in an atom is described by means of four quantum numbers which determine the spatial distribution, energy, and other properties, see Appendix 1 (p. 1285). The principal quantum number n defines the general energy level or shell to which the electron belongs. Electrons with n = 1.2, 3, 4., are sometimes referred to as K, L, M, N,. .., electrons. The orbital quantum number / defines both the shape of the electron charge distribution and its orbital angular... [Pg.22]

The first set of screening constants was obtained from the discussion of the motion of an electron in the field of the nucleus and its surrounding electron shells, idealized as electrical charges uniformly distributed over spherical surfaces of suitably chosen radii. This idealization of electron shells was first used by Schrodinger3), and later by Heisenberg4) and Unsold5), who pointed out that it is justified to a considerable extent by the quantum mechanics. The radius of a shell of electrons with principal quantum number nt is taken as... [Pg.712]

The EFG parameters Vzz and described by (4.42a) and (4.42b) do not represent the actual EFG felt by the Mossbauer nucleus. Instead, the electron shell of the Mossbauer atom will be distorted by electrostatic interaction with the noncubic distribution of the external charges, such that the EFG becomes amplified. This phenomenon has been treated by Stemheimer [54—58], who introduced an anti-shielding factor (1 —y 00) for computation of the so-called lattice contribution to the EFG, which arises from (point) charges located on the atoms surrounding the Mossbauer atom in a crystal lattice (or a molecule). In this approach,the actual lattice contribution is given by... [Pg.97]

Ligand field theory mainly considers the last contribution. For this contribution the geometric distribution of the ligands is irrelevant as long as the electrons of the central atom have a spherical distribution the repulsion energy is always the same in this case. All half and fully occupied electron shells of an atom are spherical, namely d5 high-spin and dw (and naturally d°). This is not so for other d electron configurations. [Pg.77]

BSSE also opposes the tendency of the Hartree-Fock model to keep the interacting closed shell fragments too far apart. So, when optimized geometries are considered for the complex, BSSE is found to mimic some of those effects on the electron density distribution which would be induced by the interfragment dispersion contributions. [Pg.123]

The smallest unit having the chemical properties of the element are the atoms. All atoms are made up from a number of elementary particles known as the protons, neutrons, and electrons. The protons and neutrons make up an atomic nucleus at the center of the atom, while the electrons, distributed in electron shells, surround the atomic nucleus. The atoms of each element are identical to each other but differ from those of other elements in atomic number (the number of protons in the atomic nucleus) and atomic weight (their weighted average mass) as listed in the table below. [Pg.470]

Figure 4.3 The most probable arrangement of the electrons in the valence shell of fluorine in the HF molecule. Only one localized pair is formed with the other electrons equally distributed in a ring behind the... [Pg.88]

If the electronegativity of the ligands X is much less than the electronegativity of the central atom A, the electrons in the valence shell of A are not well localized into pairs and therefore have a small or zero effect on the geometry. In such molecules the bonds are very ionic in the sense A X+, and the central atom A is essentially an anion with a spherical electron density distribution. In this case the VSEPR model is not valid, and the geometry of the molecule is determined by ligand-ligand repulsions. [Pg.128]

Figure 8. Pauli principle for a diatomic molecule (e.g., HF). In any diatomic molecule, the two tetrahedra (Figs. 7a and 7b) of opposite spin electrons in the valence shell of an atom are brought into coincidence at only one apex, leaving the most probable locations of the remaining six electrons equally distributed in a ring. Figure 8. Pauli principle for a diatomic molecule (e.g., HF). In any diatomic molecule, the two tetrahedra (Figs. 7a and 7b) of opposite spin electrons in the valence shell of an atom are brought into coincidence at only one apex, leaving the most probable locations of the remaining six electrons equally distributed in a ring.
Fig. 6 (a) 2-D 7) maps, (b) their 1-D central cross sections, and (c) the 1-D profiles of hexachloroplatinate dianion distributions obtained by electron probe analyzer measurements. S-2 and S-3 identify different porous alumina pellets, both prepared with an egg-shell distribution of hexachloroplatinate dianion the dianion is located towards the external surface of the pellet). S-2 and S-3 differ in terms of their nominal diameter and their pore-size and surface-area characteristics. Reprinted with permission from ref. 24. Copyright (2000) American Chemical Society. [Pg.294]

The Lewis electron-dot symbol is a way of representing the element and its valence electrons. The chemical symbol is written, which represents the atom s nucleus and all inner-shell electrons. The valence, or outer-shell, electrons are represented as dots surrounding the atom s symbol. Take the valence electrons, distribute them as dots one at a time around the four sides of the symbol and then pair them up until all the valence electrons are distributed Figure 11.1 shows the Lewis symbol for several different elements. [Pg.148]

The possible states of electrons are called orbitals. These are indicated by what is known as the principal quantum number and by a letter—s, p, or d. The orbitals are filled one by one as the number of electrons increases. Each orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons, which must have oppositely directed spins. Fig. A shows the distribution of the electrons among the orbitals for each of the elements. For example, the six electrons of carbon (B1) occupy the Is orbital, the 2s orbital, and two 2p orbitals. A filled Is orbital has the same electron configuration as the noble gas helium (He). This region of the electron shell of carbon is therefore abbreviated as He in Fig. A. Below this, the numbers of electrons in each of the other filled orbitals (2s and 2p in the case of carbon) are shown on the right margin. For example, the electron shell of chlorine (B2) consists of that of neon (Ne) and seven additional electrons in 3s and 3p orbitals. In iron (B3), a transition metal of the first series, electrons occupy the 4s orbital even though the 3d orbitals are still partly empty. Many reactions of the transition metals involve empty d orbitals—e.g., redox reactions or the formation of complexes with bases. [Pg.2]

The average local electrostatic potential V(r)/p(r), introduced by Pohtzer [57], led Sen and coworkers [58] to conjecture that the global maximum in V(r)/p(r) defines the location of the core-valence separation in ground-state atoms. Using this criterion, one finds N values [Eq. (3.1)] of 2.065 and 2.112 e for carbon and neon, respectively, and 10.073 e for argon, which are reasonable estimates in light of what we know about the electronic shell structure. Politzer [57] also made the significant observation that V(r)/p(r) has a maximum any time the radial distribution function D(r) = Avr pir) is found to have a minimum. [Pg.19]

Several formulations were proposed [65, 66], but the intuitive notation introduced by Hansen and Coppens [67] afterwards became the most popular. Within this method, the electron density of a crystal is expanded in atomic contributions. The expansion is better understood in terms of rigid pseudoatoms, i.e., atoms that behave stmcturally according to their electron charge distribution and rigidly follow the nuclear motion. A pseudoatom density is expanded according to its electronic stiucture, for simplicity reduced to the core and the valence electron densities (but in principle each atomic shell could be independently refined). Thus,... [Pg.55]

Electron Configuration distribution of electrons into different shells and orbitals from the lower to higher energy levels Electronegativity measure of the attraction of an element for a bonding pair of electrons Electroplating process where a metal is reduced on to the surface of an object, which serves as the cathode in an electrochemical cell... [Pg.340]

VSEPR Model valence shell electron pair repulsion model, model used to predict the geometry of molecule based on distribution of shared and unshared electron pairs distributed around central atom of a molecule... [Pg.350]


See other pages where Electronic shells, distribution is mentioned: [Pg.839]    [Pg.1469]    [Pg.1843]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.19]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.208 ]




SEARCH



Core-shell electron density distribution

Electron distribution

Electron distribution in completed shells

Electronic distribution

Electronics shells

The Distribution of Electrons in Valence Shells

© 2024 chempedia.info