Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electronic predissociation process

The preceding discussion was limited mostly to VP processes occurring by direct coupling of the quasibound state of the complex to the dissociative continuum, which is the simplest and most commonly observed decay route for the complexes. However, these systems also serve as ideal venues for studying an array of more complicated dynamical processes, including IVR, and electronic predissociation. This brief section will focus on the former, underscoring some of the inherent dynamical differences between Rg XY complexes by discussing the IVR behavior of a few systems. [Pg.410]

Among them, Li-i-HP can be considered a benchmark model system [29, 30] because its low number of electrons makes possible to calculate accurate PES s. Its electronic spectrum has been meassured by Polanyi and coworkers [22], and has been recently very nicely reproduced using purely adiabatic PES s [31]. In the simulation of the spectrum[31], the transition lines were artificially dressed by lorentzians which widths were fitted to better reproduce the experimental envelop. The physical origin of such widths is the decay of the quasibound states of the excited electronic states through electronic predissociation (EP) towards the ground electronic state. This EP process is the result of the non-adiabatic cou-... [Pg.386]

The electronic predissociation from different rovibrational levels of the A and B electronic states has been evaluated, to study the effect of the initial excitation on the process. The bounds states chosen are 1,2,3 and 6 for A, and fc=l,2,3,6 and 12 for B, which correspond to the bending progression of states appearing in the... [Pg.393]

It should be mentioned here that even though some transitions are theoretically predicted to have large transition probabilities, they may in practice be rather weak if the upper state is severely predissociated or is not significantly populated during the electron capture process that forms the Rydberg molecule from its parent cation. [Pg.216]

The distinction between direct dissociation processes discussed in the present section and indirect dissociation or predissociation processes discussed in Section 7.3 to Section 7.14 is that in a direct process photoexcitation occurs from a bound state (typically v = 0 of the electronic ground state) directly to a repulsive state (or to an energy region above the dissociation asymptote of a bound state) whereas in an indirect process the photoexcitation is to a nominally bound vibration-rotation level of one electronically excited state which in turn is predissociated by perturbative interaction with the continuum of another electronic state. Direct dissociation, often termed a half collision is much faster and dynamically simpler than indirect dissociation. In a direct dissociation process the distance between atoms increases monotonically and the time required for the two atoms to separate is shorter than a typical vibrational or rotational period (Beswick and Jortner, 1990). [Pg.471]

One should not be left with the impression that electronically nonadiabatic processes are limited to predissociation. Figure 1(a) shows a crossing between two excited repulsive curves in the photolysis of methyl iodide. If the surface hopping process is efficient enough, it can even influence a dissociating molecule that passes the curve crossing within a few femtoseconds, as is the case for methyl iodide photodissociation. [Pg.281]

The formation of ion pairs may occur either by direct dissociation or by predissociation [processes (3) and (4) of Section 3. ]. The behavior of the cross section for such processes is the same as that for dissociation or predissociation into neutral fragments a smooth continuum indicates direct dissociation, while predissociation is characterized by a band structure broadened according to the lifetime of the state. The most intense ion-pair formation processes usually exhibit the structure characteristic of predissociation. The occurrence of intense ion-pair formation requires a favorable set of potential curves (or surfaces) and is not readily predictable. The mere fact that a molecule contains an atom or radical of high electron affinity gives no assurance that the negative ion will be formed in detectable amounts by photon absorption. [Pg.51]

The problem lies in the assumption required to derive the selection rule that the u=l and u=0 surfaces are the same shape and are merely displaced vertically as we have illustrated in Fig. 2. For HF HF on the contrary, the intermolecular potential is highly anisotropic and rotational excitation of the fragments results in an effective potential which is shallow and may actually cross other surfaces. This has been demonstrated in calculations of Halberstadt et al.. The surfaces taken from their work are shown in Fig. 4. The curve crossing yields relaxation times orders of magnitude more efficient than those calculated by our selection rule. It is a challenge to the theorists to model the predissociation process, consistent with experiment, that allows both HF molecules to rotate on fragmentation. Clearly anisotropic effects will play an important role in understanding vibrational predissociation in other systems as well-for example, in the electronically excited state of OH Ar by Lester et al.. ... [Pg.20]

The LIF technique is extremely versatile. The determination of absolute intermediate species concentrations, however, needs either an independent calibration or knowledge of the fluorescence quantum yield, i.e., the ratio of radiative events (detectable fluorescence light) over the sum of all decay processes from the excited quantum state—including predissociation, col-lisional quenching, and energy transfer. This fraction may be quite small (some tenths of a percent, e.g., for the detection of the OH radical in a flame at ambient pressure) and will depend on the local flame composition, pressure, and temperature as well as on the excited electronic state and ro-vibronic level. Short-pulse techniques with picosecond lasers enable direct determination of the quantum yield [14] and permit study of the relevant energy transfer processes [17-20]. [Pg.5]

The simulations demonstrated, that after the pump excitation of the iodine molecules into their B state three elementary dynamical processes determine the further reaction course (i) the predissociation of the iodine molecules caused by the coupling of the electronic B state to the repulsive ajo states, (ii) the electronic transitions from these states to the A, A, and X states due to the caging effect, and (iii) the vibrational relaxation in all electronic states involved in the reaction. Additionally, an energy shift of the potential curves due to the influence of the crystalline DDR cage could be observed. [Pg.560]

Ory developed to explain them, have yielded considerable insight into the variety of dynamical processes that occur subsequent to electronic excitation [1], From these studies, one hopes to obtain bond dissociation energies, characterize the symmetry of the excited state, measure the product branching ratios, and determine if the excited state undergoes direct dissociation on an excited-state surface, predissociation via another excited state, or internal conversion to the ground state followed by statistical decay to products. [Pg.730]

The physicochemical stage includes the chemical processes in electron excitation states, as well as the chemical transformations of the active intermediates under nonequilibrium conditions. These are the predissociation and the ion-molecular reactions that take about 1013 s the recombination of positive ions with thermalized electrons (1CT12-10 10s) and the electron-solvation reactions (10 12-10-1° s). Thus, the physicochemical stage lasts from 1CT13 to 10-I0s. [Pg.264]

Bound electronic states exhibit a discrete spectrum of rovibrational eigenstates below the dissociation energy. The interaction between discrete levels of two bound electronic states may lead to perturbations in their rovibrational spectra and to nonradiative transitions between the two potentials. In the case of an intersystem crossing, this process is often followed by a radiative depletion. Above the dissociation energy and for unbound states, the energy is not quantized, that is, the spectrum is continuous. The coupling of a bound state to the vibrational continuum of another electronic state leads to predissociation. [Pg.187]

In regions of the spectrum where a tunable laser is available it may be possible to use it to obtain an absorption spectrum in the same way as a tunable klystron or backward wave oscillator is used in microwave or millimetre wave spectroscopy (see Section 3.4.1). Absorbance (Equation 2.16) is measured as a function of frequency or wavenumber. This technique can be used with a diode laser to produce an infrared absorption spectrum. When electronic transitions are being studied, greater sensitivity is usually achieved by monitoring secondary processes which follow, and are directly related to, the absorption which has occurred. Such processes include fluorescence, dissociation, or predissociation, and, following the absorption of one or more additional photons, ionization. The spectrum resulting from monitoring these processes usually resembles the absorption spectrum very closely. [Pg.363]


See other pages where Electronic predissociation process is mentioned: [Pg.385]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.2075]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.304]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.187 , Pg.385 , Pg.386 , Pg.388 ]




SEARCH



Electron processes

Electronic processes

Predissociation

© 2024 chempedia.info