Electronic of molecules

Photoelectron O o o Ejection of an electron from the valence or inner shell Ionization energies of valence or inner-shell electrons of molecules (Section 27-5)... 

The techniques considered in this chapter are infrared spectroscopy (or vibrational spectroscopy), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (or electronic spectroscopy) and mass spectrometry. Absorption of infrared radiation is associated with the energy differences between vibrational states of molecules nuclear magnetic resonance absorption is associated with changes in the orientation of atomic nuclei in an applied magnetic field absorption of ultraviolet and visible radiation is associated with changes in the energy states of the valence electrons of molecules and mass spectrometry is concerned... 

Nonetheless, the early disagreement of counterpoise corrected H-bond potentials with experiment spawned a number of variants of the technique which reduced the BSSE correction and left the potential more attractive than if the full error were removed. Some of these methods justified themselves on the grounds that the electrons of one molecule should not expand into the orbital space of the partner molecule that is already occupied by elec-trons . Hence, damping factors were introduced or more formal means of permitting the electrons of molecule A to partially occupy only the vacant MOs of molecule B, and vice versa - Another technique proposed employing a perturbing charge field gen-... 

We shall now consider in detail the mechanism of energy dissipation by interaction of charged particles with the valence electrons of molecules. The interactions of fast and slow electrons have to be treated separately. Fast electrons have much larger velocities than the valence electrons. This corresponds to energies larger than 100 eV. 

In the radiolysis by f3- or y-radiation with maximum energy of about 1 Mev. the most typical process (see Table II) is the electronic transitions of valence electrons of molecules. Other processes like direct vibrational excitations of the ground state or electron capture by molecules are characteristic only for the subexcitation electrons with kinetic energy below the threshold E0 of electronic excitations. By the interactions of subexcitation electrons a fraction of about 10 to 15% of the total absorbed energy is dissipated. This fraction may partially be utilized for chemical changes however, the corresponding yield should always be considered separately since the mechanisms are much more intricate here and depend strongly on the nature of the medium. 

First, for the large separation of the two molecules, the electrons of molecule A are distinguishable from the electrons of molecule B. We have to stress the classical flavor of this approximation. Second, we assume that the exact wave functions of both isolated molecules and are at our disposal. 

The electrons of molecules behave in much the same way, but monitoring their possible energies is carried out in a somewhat different manner. Whereas the atomic spectroscopy that I have described makes use of the emission of light, molecular spectroscopy does the opposite it makes use of the absorption of light. 

Equation (13) shows that after the multipole expansion of the potential is performed, the coordinates of electrons of molecule A are separated from those of molecule B. Therefore, if this expansion is substituted in Eqs. (5), (8), (10), and (11), the asymptotic interaction energy is expressible in terms of integrals each involving only coordinates of one monomer. Thus, this energy is expressible in terms of monomer properties only. This fact makes the calculations in the asymptotic region much easier than for the finite distances, where this approximation cannot be applied. It is important to realize that the multipole expansion has built-in dependence on the mutual orientation of two monomers. Thus, asymptotically the anisotropy of the polarization part of the interaction energy is precisely predicted by this expansion. Although for finite separations this anisotropy is modified by the penetration effects discussed below, the asymptotic prediction remains useful at finite R. 

In these equations, ks is the Boltzmann s constant (1.38 X 10 J K ), Tis the temperature, I is the first ionization potential (J), oo,- is the electronic polarizability (C m J ) and p is the dipole moment (p = ql) often given in Debye (1 Debye = 3.336 x 10 Cm). In the dipole moment equation q is the electric charge (C), and I is the distance between the positive and negative charge within a given molecule (m). The electronic polarizabihty is defined as the ease with which the electrons of molecules are displaced by an electric field, e.g. that created by an ion or a polar molecule. The polarizability is expressed in m V or... 

Consider a nonpolar molecule i in the vicinity of a polar moleculej The latter generates an electric field which causes a displacement of the electrons of molecule i and hence induces a dipole on it. The resulting force... 

---