Electron transfer, scanning electrochemical

If M is unstable then ipb/fpf will be less than unity. Its magnitude will depend upon the scan rate, the value of the first-order constant k, and the conditions of the experiment. At fast scan rates the ratio ipb/ ip, may approach one if the time gate for the decomposition of M is small compared with the half-life of M-, (In 2jk). As the temperature is lowered, the magnitude of k may be sufficiently decreased for full reversible behaviour to be observed. The decomposition of M- could involve the attack of a solution species upon it, e.g. an electrophile. In such cases, ipb/ipf, will of course be dependent upon the concentration of the particular substrate (under pseudo-first-order conditions, k is kapparent). Quantitative cyclic voltammetric and related techniques allow the evaluation of the rate constants for such electrochemical—chemical, EC, processes. At the limit, the electron-transfer process is completely irreversible if k is sufficiently large with respect to the rate of heterogeneous electron transfer the electrochemical and chemical steps are concerted on the time-scale of the cyclic voltammetric experiment.1-3... 

The SEEPR technique allows the simultaneous recording of the CV and the CW EPR spectrum of the radicals produced during the electron transfer reactions (Khaled et al. 1991). The SEEPR technique consists of an IBM enhanced electrolytic cell inserted in a rotating cylindrical EPR cavity. The cell is no longer sold by IBM, but a description can be found (Khaled et al. 1990, 1991). The CVs were obtained using a commercial (BAS-100) electrochemical analyzer while simultaneously recording the EPR spectra during the scan. 

How can these photochemical and electrochemical data be reconciled With the benzylic molecules under discussion, electron transfer may involve the n or the cr orbital, giving rise to stepwise and concerted mechanisms, respectively. This is a typical case where the mechanism is a function of the driving force of the reaction, as evoked earlier. Since the photochemical reactions are strongly down-hill whereas the electrochemical reaction is slightly up-hill at low scan rate, the mechanism may change from stepwise in the first case to concerted in the second. However, regardless of the validity of this interpretation, it is important to address a more fundamental question, namely, whether it is true, from first principles, that a purely dissociative photoinduced electron transfer is necessarily endowed with a unity quantum yield and, more generally, to establish what are the expressions of the quantum yields for concerted and stepwise reactions. 

The Butler-Volmer rate law has been used to characterize the kinetics of a considerable number of electrode electron transfers in the framework of various electrochemical techniques. Three figures are usually reported the standard (formal) potential, the standard rate constant, and the transfer coefficient. As discussed earlier, neglecting the transfer coefficient variation with electrode potential at a given scan rate is not too serious a problem, provided that it is borne in mind that the value thus obtained might vary when going to a different scan rate in cyclic voltammetry or, more generally, when the time-window parameter of the method is varied. 

In the electrochemical case, using, for example, cyclic voltammetry, one way of driving the potential toward more negative values is to increase the scan rate. This is true whether the linearization procedure or the convolution approach is followed. In the first case, equation (3.4) shows that the activation free energy at the peak, AG, is a decreasing function of the scan rate as a result of the kinetic competition between electron transfer and diffusion. The larger the scan rate, the faster the diffusion and thus the faster the electron transfer has to be in order to compete. This implies a smaller value AG, which is achieved by a shift of the peak potential toward more negative values. 

A preliminary electrochemical overview of the redox aptitude of a species can easily be obtained by varying with time the potential applied to an electrode immersed in a solution of the species under study and recording the relevant current-potential curves. These curves first reveal the potential at which redox processes occur. In addition, the size of the currents generated by the relative faradaic processes is normally proportional to the concentration of the active species. Finally, the shape of the response as a function of the potential scan rate allows one to determine whether there are chemical complications (adsorption or homogeneous reactions) which accompany the electron transfer processes. 

This system can be taken as an example of so-called reversible, diffusion-controlled electrochemical processes. In short, during the initial anodic scan, an electron-transfer process between the ferrocyanide (or hexacyanoferrate(II)) ions, [Fe(CN)6] ", and the working electrode occurs. This can be represented by means of the equation (here, aq denotes species in aqueous solution) ... 

In this equation, aua represents the product of the coefficient of electron transfer (a) by the number of electrons (na) involved in the rate-determining step, n the total number of electrons involved in the electrochemical reaction, k the heterogeneous electrochemical rate constant at the zero potential, D the coefficient of diffusion of the electroactive species, and c the concentration of the same in the bulk of the solution. The initial potential is E/ and G represents a numerical constant. This equation predicts a linear variation of the logarithm of the current. In/, on the applied potential, E, which can easily be compared with experimental current-potential curves in linear potential scan and cyclic voltammetries. This type of dependence between current and potential does not apply to electron transfer processes with coupled chemical reactions [186]. In several cases, however, linear In/ vs. E plots can be approached in the rising portion of voltammetric curves for the solid-state electron transfer processes involving species immobilized on the electrode surface [131, 187-191], reductive/oxidative dissolution of metallic deposits [79], and reductive/oxidative dissolution of insulating compounds [147,148]. Thus, linear potential scan voltammograms for surface-confined electroactive species verify [79]... 

Another complication of the reversible case may be that the reduction product A reacts chemically and is thus not available for reoxidation on the reverse scan, so only a small or no anodic peak is seen. In the usual electrochemical nomenclature, an electron-transfer reaction is called E and a chemical follow-up reaction C. The process in question would thus be an EC reaction the chemical step would after a reduction in most cases be a reaction with an electrophile, including protons, a cleavage reaction, where a nucleophile is expelled, or a dimerization for oxidation reactions with a nucleophile, loss of a proton or dimerization would be the most common follow-up reactions. 

Cyclic voltammetry is one such electrochemical technique which has found considerable favour amongst coordination chemists. It allows the study of the solution electron-transfer chemistry of a compound on the sub-millisecond to second timescale it has a well developed theoretical basis and is relatively simple and inexpensive. Cyclic voltammetry is a controlled potential technique it is performed at a stationary microelectrode which is in contact with an electrolyte solution containing the species of interest. The potential, E, at the microelectrode is varied linearly with time, t, and at some pre-determined value of E the scan direction is reversed. The current which flows through the cell is measured continuously during the forward and reverse scans and it is the analysis of the resulting i—E response, and its dependence on the scan rate dE/dt, which provides a considerable amount of information. Consider, for example, the idealized behaviour of a compound, M, in an inert electrolyte at an inert microelectrode (Scheme 1). 

The diffusion of the electroactive ions is both physical and due to electron transfer reactions.45 The occurrence of either or both mechanisms is a function of the electroactive species present. It has been observed that the detailed electrochemical behaviour of the electroactive species often deviates from the ideal thin film behaviour. For example, for an ideal nemstian reaction under Langmuir isotherm conditions there should be no splitting between the anodic and cathodic peaks in the cyclic voltammogram further, for a one-electron charge at 25 °C the width at half peak height should be 90.6 mV.4 In practice a difference between anodic and cathodic potentials may be finite even at slow scan rates. This arises from kinetic effects of phase formation and of interconversion between different forms of the polymer-confined electroactive molecules with different standard potentials.46... 

---