Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electron spin reasonance

The study of radiochemical yields in such analytically difficult and variable systems as meat proteins is a complex problem. Fortunately, however, both chemical (4,12,23,46,49) and electron spin reasonance studies (6,16, 22-25, 42) by several workers have shown that the major radiochemical reactions in proteins closely parallel those of simple peptides and amino acids, justifying the use of these simpler systems for preliminary radiochemical investigations. [Pg.44]

Electron Spin Reasonance of Transition Metal Complexes B. A. Goodman and J. B. Raynor... [Pg.299]

In electron-spin-echo-detected EPR spectroscopy, spectral infomiation may, in principle, be obtained from a Fourier transfomiation of the second half of the echo shape, since it represents the FID of the refocused magnetizations, however, now recorded with much reduced deadtime problems. For the inhomogeneously broadened EPR lines considered here, however, the FID and therefore also the spin echo, show little structure. For this reason, the amplitude of tire echo is used as the main source of infomiation in ESE experiments. Recording the intensity of the two-pulse or tliree-pulse echo amplitude as a function of the external magnetic field defines electron-spm-echo- (ESE-)... [Pg.1577]

Derivation of an energy level diagram shows that it consists of two sets of energy levels, one corresponding to the single lines and the other to the double lines, and that no transitions between the two sets of levels are observed. For this reason it was suggested that helium exists in two separate forms. In 1925 it became clear that, when account is taken of electron spin, the two forms are really singlet helium and triplet helium. [Pg.219]

Another reason for interest in microwaves in chemical technology involves the fields of dielectric spectrometry, electron spin resonance (esr), or nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) (see Magnetic spin resonance). AppHcations in chemical technology relating to microwave quantum effects are of a diagnostic nature and are not reviewed herein. [Pg.337]

The use of selective deuteration is a powerful tool in electron spin resonance (ESR) experiments, in order to establish unequivocal assignments of experimental spectra of radicals. The reason for this is, as is well known, the difference in magnetic properties between the deuteron and the proton, which can be exploited to distinguish chemically inequivalent hydrogens in the molecule. [Pg.340]

The magnetic forces between electrons are negligibly small compared to the electrostatic forces, and they are of no importance in determining the distribution of the electrons in a molecule and therefore in the formation of chemical bonds. The only forces that are important in determining the distribution of electrons in atoms and molecules, and therefore in determining their properties, are the electrostatic forces between electrons and nuclei. Nevertheless electron spin plays a very important role in chemical bonding through the Pauli principle, which we discuss next. It provides the fundamental reason why electrons in molecules appear to be found in pairs as Lewis realized but could not explain. [Pg.64]

The chapter Electron Spin Resonance in Catalysis by Lunsford was prompted by the extensive activity in this field since the publication of an article on a similar subject in Volume 12 of this serial publication. This chapter is limited to paramagnetic species that are reasonably well defined by means of their spectra. It contains applications of ESR technique to the study of adsorbed atoms and molecules, and also to the evaluation of surface effects. The application of ESR to the determination of the state of transition metal ions in catalytic reactions is also discussed. [Pg.368]

Electron spin resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance, and neutron diffraction methods allow a quantitative determination of the degree of covalence. The reasonance methods utilize the hyperfine interaction between the spin of the transferred electrons and the nuclear spin of the ligands (Stevens, 1953), whereas the neutron diffraction methods use the reduction of spin of the metallic ion as well as the expansion of the form factor [Hubbard and Marshall, 1965). The Mossbauer isomer shift which depends on the total electron density of the nucleus (Walker et al., 1961 Danon, 1966) can be used in the case of Fe. It will be particularly influenced by transfer to the empty 4 s orbitals, but transfer to 3 d orbitals will indirectly influence the 1 s, 2 s, and 3 s electron density at the nucleus. [Pg.38]

The quantum alternative for the description of the vibrational degrees of freedom has been commented by Westlund et al. (85). The comments indicate that, to get a reasonable description of the field-dependent electron spin relaxation caused by the quantum vibrations, one needs to consider the first as well as the second order coupling between the spin and the vibrational modes in the ZFS interaction, and to take into account the lifetime of a vibrational state, Tw, as well as the time constant,T2V, associated with a width of vibrational transitions. A model of nuclear spin relaxation, including the electron spin subsystem coupled to a quantum vibrational bath, has been proposed (7d5). The contributions of the T2V and Tw vibrational relaxation (associated with the linear and the quadratic term in the Taylor expansion of the ZFS tensor, respectively) to the electron spin relaxation was considered. The description of the electron spin dynamics was included in the calculations of the PRE by the SBM approach, as well as in the framework of the general slow-motion theory, with appropriate modifications. The theoretical predictions were compared once again with the experimental PRE values for the Ni(H20)g complex in aqueous solution. This work can be treated as a quantum-mechanical counterpart of the classical approach presented in the paper by Kruk and Kowalewski (161). [Pg.99]

It is relatively common for DFT calculations to not explicitly include electron spin, for the simple reason that this approximation makes calculations faster. In materials where spin effects may be important, however, it is crucial that spin is included. Fe, for example, is a metal that is well known for its magnetic properties. Figure 8.10 shows the energy of bulk Fe in the bcc crystal structure from calculations with no spin polarization and calculations with ferromagnetic spin ordering. The difference is striking electron spins lower the energy substantially and increase the predicted equilibrium lattice constant by 0.1 A. [Pg.188]

In this review we shall first establish the theoretical foundations of the semi-classical theory that eventually lead to the formulation of the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian. The latter is an approximation suited to make the connection to phenomenological model Hamiltonians like the Heisenberg Hamiltonian for the description of electronic spin-spin interactions. The complete derivations have been given in detail in Ref. (21), but turn out to be very involved and are thus scattered over many pages in Ref. (21). For this reason, we aim here at a summary that is as brief and concise as possible so that all relevant connections between different levels of approximation are evident. This allows us to connect present-day quantum chemical methods to phenomenological Hamiltonians and hence to establish and review the current status of these first-principles methods applied to transition-metal clusters. [Pg.178]

This is a reasonable expression from a conceptual point of view since we are interested in the magnetic interaction of local metal centers resulting in either ferro- or antiferromagnetic coupling. Hence, we shall delve deeper into the concepts of local electronic spins in the next section. [Pg.203]

Note diat one drawback of EHT is a failure to take into account electron spin. There is no mechanism for distinguishing between different multiplets, except that a chemist can, by hand, decide which orbitals are occupied, and thus enforce the Pauli exclusion principle. However, die energy computed for a triplet state is exacdy the same as the energy for the corresponding open-shell singlet (i.e., the state that results from spin-flip of one of the unpaired electrons in the triplet) - the electronic energy is the sum of the occupied orbital energies irrespective of spin - such an equality occurs experimentally only when the partially occupied orbitals fail to interact with each other either for symmetry reasons or because they are infinitely separated. [Pg.136]


See other pages where Electron spin reasonance is mentioned: [Pg.1553]    [Pg.1572]    [Pg.1573]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.192]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.144 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info