Electron scattering, inelastic total

A whole class of models involving localization by phonons and static defects has been reviewed by Abrikosov and Ryzkhin [49]. These models also give a T2 law for P/,(T) in the weak inelasticity limit when 0)ot 1, where phonon frequency and 1/t is the total electron scattering rate. Roughly speaking, these models reflect the strong tendency... 

The total contribution to the Auger electron signal is then dependent upon the attenuation length (kM) in the matrix before being inelastically scattered, and upon the transmission efficiency of the electron spectrometer as well as the efficiency of the electron detector. Calculated intensities of Auger peaks rarely give an accuracy better than 50%, and it is more reliable to adopt an approach which utilises standards, preferably obtained in the same instrument. 

A further technique exists for the determination of triplet energy levels. This technique, called electron impact spectroscopy, involves the use of inelastic scattering of low-energy electrons by collision with molecules. The inelastic collisions of the electrons with the molecules result in transfer of the electron energy to the molecule and the consequent excitation of the latter. Unlike electronic excitation by photons, excitation by electron impact is subject to no spin selection rule. Thus transitions that are spin and/or orbitally forbidden for photon excitation are totally allowed for electron impact excitation. 

Landauer proposed in 1957 the first mesoscopic theoretical approach to charge transport [176]. Transport is treated as a scattering problem, ignoring initially all inelastic interactions. Phase coherence is assumed to be preserved within the entire conductor. Transport properties, such as the electrical conductance, are intimately related to the transmission probability for an electron to cross the system. Landauer considered the current as a consequence of the injection of electrons at one end of a sample, and the probability of the electrons reaching the other end. The total conductance is determined by the sum of all current-carrying eigenmodes and their transmission probability, which leads to the Landauer formula of a ID system ... 

Fig. 2.1. Schematic illustration of the behaviour of the positron-helium and electron-helium total scattering cross sections. Notable are the large differences in magnitude of the cross sections at low energies, their merging at approximately 200 eV and the onset of inelastic processes at the positronium formation threshold EPS in the positron curve.

As the positron energy is raised above the positronium formation threshold, EPs, the total cross section undergoes a conspicuous increase. Subsequent experimentation (see Chapter 4) has confirmed that much of this increase can be attributed to positronium formation via the reaction (1.12). Significant contributions also arise from target excitation and, more importantly, ionization above the respective thresholds (see Chapter 5). In marked contrast to the structure in aT(e+) associated with the opening of inelastic channels, the electron total cross section has a much smoother energy dependence, which can be attributed to the dominance of the elastic scattering cross section for this projectile. 

Fig. 5.5. Inelastic scattering cross sections for positron-02 collisions. Key ,

Because neutrons are electrically neutral, their interaction with electrons is very small and primary ionization by neutrons is negligible. The interaction of neutrons with matter is practically confined to the nuclei and comprises elastic and inelastic scattering and nuclear reactions. In elastic collisions the total kinetic energy remains constant, whereas in inelastic collisions part of the kinetic energy is given off as excitation energy. 

---