Electron Marcus theory

Eig. 2. Electron-transfer reaction rate, vs exoergicity of reaction the dashed line is according to simple Marcus theory the soUd line and data poiats are... 

This section contains a brief review of the molecular version of Marcus theory, as developed by Warshel [81]. The free energy surface for an electron transfer reaction is shown schematically in Eigure 1, where R represents the reactants and A, P represents the products D and A , and the reaction coordinate X is the degree of polarization of the solvent. The subscript o for R and P denotes the equilibrium values of R and P, while P is the Eranck-Condon state on the P-surface. The activation free energy, AG, can be calculated from Marcus theory by Eq. (4). This relation is based on the assumption that the free energy is a parabolic function of the polarization coordinate. Eor self-exchange transfer reactions, we need only X to calculate AG, because AG° = 0. Moreover, we can write... 

Other measures of nucleophilicity have been proposed. Brauman et al. studied Sn2 reactions in the gas phase and applied Marcus theory to obtain the intrinsic barriers of identity reactions. These quantities were interpreted as intrinsic nucleo-philicities. Streitwieser has shown that the reactivity of anionic nucleophiles toward methyl iodide in dimethylformamide (DMF) is correlated with the overall heat of reaction in the gas phase he concludes that bond strength and electron affinity are the important factors controlling nucleophilicity. The dominant role of the solvent in controlling nucleophilicity was shown by Parker, who found solvent effects on nucleophilic reactivity of many orders of magnitude. For example, most anions are more nucleophilic in DMF than in methanol by factors as large as 10, because they are less effectively shielded by solvation in the aprotic solvent. Liotta et al. have measured rates of substitution by anionic nucleophiles in acetonitrile solution containing a crown ether, which forms an inclusion complex with the cation (K ) of the nucleophile. These rates correlate with gas phase rates of the same nucleophiles, which, in this crown ether-acetonitrile system, are considered to be naked anions. The solvation of anionic nucleophiles is treated in Section 8.3. 

According to the Marcus theory [64] for outer-sphere reactions, there is good correlation between the heterogeneous (electrode) and homogeneous (solution) rate constants. This is the theoretical basis for the proposed use of hydrated-electron rate constants (ke) as a criterion for the reactivity of an electrolyte component towards lithium or any electrode at lithium potential. Table 1 shows rate-constant values for selected materials that are relevant to SE1 formation and to lithium batteries. Although many important materials are missing (such as PC, EC, diethyl carbonate (DEC), LiPF6, etc.), much can be learned from a careful study of this table (and its sources). 

Applications of the Marcus theory are by no means limited to electron transfer. The generality of this approach has been cited.38... 

Marcus theory can be applied to any single-step process where something is transferred from one particle to another. It was originally derived for electron... 

Samec Z, Weber J (1973) The influence of chemisorbed sulfur on the kinetic parameters of the reduction of Fe " ions on a platinum electrode on the basis of the Marcus theory of electron transfer. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 44 229-238... 

Electrochemical Electron Transfer From Marcus Theory to Electrocatalysis... 

In this chapter, we wiU review electrochemical electron transfer theory on metal electrodes, starting from the theories of Marcus [1956] and Hush [1958] and ending with the catalysis of bond-breaking reactions. On this route, we will explore the relation to ion transfer reactions, and also cover the earlier models for noncatalytic bond breaking. Obviously, this will be a tour de force, and many interesting side-issues win be left unexplored. However, we hope that the unifying view that we present, based on a framework of model Hamiltonians, will clarify the various aspects of this most important class of electrochemical reactions. 

Marcus, R. A., Chemical and electrochemical electron-transfer theory, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 15, 155 (1964). 

According to the Marcus theory [9], the electron transfer rate depends upon the reaction enthalpy (AG), the electronic coupling (V) and the reorganization energy (A). By changing the electron donor and the bridge we measured the influence of these parameters on the charge transfer rate. The re-... 

Table 6.6 lists some reactions of the electron in water, ammonia, and alcohols. These are not exhaustive, but have been chosen for the sake of analyzing reaction mechanisms. Only three alcohols—methanol, ethanol, and 2-propanol—are included where intercomparison can be effected. On the theoretical side, Marcus (1965a, b) applied his electron transfer concept (Marcus, 1964) to reactions of es. The Russian school simultaneously pursued the topic vigorously (Levich, 1966 Dogonadze et al, 1969 Dogonadze, 1971 Vorotyntsev et al, 1970 see also Schmidt, 1973). Kestner and Logan (1972) pointed out the similarity between the Marcus theory and the theories of the Russian school. The experimental features of eh reactions have been detailed by Hart and Anbar (1970), and a review of various es reactions has been presented by Matheson (1975). Bolton and Freeman (1976) have discussed solvent effects on es reaction rates in water and in alcohols. 

In summary, to apply the Marcus theory of electron transfer, it is necessary to see if the temperature dependence of the electron transfer rate constant can be described by a function of the Arrhenius form. When this is valid, one can then determine the activation energy AEa only under this condition can we use AEa to determine if the parabolic dependence on AG/ is valid and if the reaction coordinate is defined. 

The first attempt to describe the dynamics of dissociative electron transfer started with the derivation from existing thermochemical data of the standard potential for the dissociative electron transfer reaction, rx r.+x-,12 14 with application of the Butler-Volmer law for electrochemical reactions12 and of the Marcus quadratic equation for a series of homogeneous reactions.1314 Application of the Marcus-Hush model to dissociative electron transfers had little basis in electron transfer theory (the same is true for applications to proton transfer or SN2 reactions). Thus, there was no real justification for the application of the Marcus equation and the contribution of bond breaking to the intrinsic barrier was not established. 

In our description of the Marcus theory of electron-transfer reactions we have found it helpful to plot the free energy change in the three dimensional picture shown in Fig. 10 (Albery, 1975c, 1980). This picture emphasizes that... 

---