Electron Electroneutrality

The chemical potential pi, has been generalized to the electrochemical potential Hj since we will be dealing with phases whose charge may be varied. The problem that now arises is that one desires to deal with individual ionic species and that these are not independently variable. In the present treatment, the difficulty is handled by regarding the electrons of the metallic phase as the dependent component whose amount varies with the addition or removal of charged components in such a way that electroneutrality is preserved. One then writes, for the ith charged species. 

In general, then, anion-forming adsorbates should find p-type semiconductors (such as NiO) more active than insulating materials and these, in turn, more active than n-type semiconductors (such as ZnO). It is not necessary that the semiconductor type be determined by an excess or deficiency of a native ion impurities, often deliberately added, can play the same role. Thus if Lr ions are present in NiO, in lattice positions, additional Ni ions must also be present to maintain electroneutrality these now compete for electrons with oxygen and reduce the activity toward oxygen adsorption. 

The condensation of aldehydes or ketones with secondary amines leads to "encunines via N-hemiacetals and immonium hydroxides, when the water is removed. In these conjugated systems electron density and nudeophilicity are largely transferred from the nitrogen to the a-carbon atom, and thus enamines are useful electroneutral d -reagents (G.A. Cook, 1969 S.F. Dyke, 1973). A bulky heterocyclic substituent supports regio- and stereoselective reactions. 

As each B atom contributes 1 electron to its B-Ht bond and 2 electrons to the framework MOs, the (n + 1) framework bonding MOs are just filled by the 2n electrons from nB atoms and the 2 electrons from the anionic charge. Further, it is possible (conceptually) to remove a BHt group and replace it by 2 electrons to compensate for the 2 electrons contributed by the BHi group to the MOs. Electroneutrality can then be achieved by adding the appropriate number of protons this does not alter the number of electrons in the system and hence all bonding MOs remain just filled. 

At any interface between two different phases there will be a redistribution of charge in each phase at the interface with a consequent loss of its electroneutrality, although the interface as a whole remains electrically neutral. (Bockris considers an interface to be sharp and definite to within an atomic layer, whereas an interphase is less sharply defined and may extend from at least two molecular diameters to tens of thousands of nanometres the interphase may be regarded as the region between the two phases in which the properties have not yet reached those of the bulk of either phase .) In the simplest case the interface between a metal and a solution could be visualised as a line of excess electrons at the surface of the metal and an equal number of positive charges in the solution that are in contact with the metal (Fig. 20.2). Thus although each phase has an excess charge the interface as a whole is electrically neutral. 

A few years ago3 71 proposed an electroneutrality principle—the postulate that the electron distribution in stable molecules and crystals is such that the electrical charge that is associated with each atom is close to zero, and in all cases less than 1, in electronic units. In a molecule involving single bonds we expect a transfer of charge from atom to... 

The transfer of an electron to the iron atom is compatible with the electroneutrality principle. The electronegativity of iron is 1.8, leading to 12% ionic character of the iron-carbon bonds and to the satisfactory value +0.04 for the resultant charge on an iron atom that has accepted an electron and is forming nine bonds with carbon atoms. 

Here the phosphorus atom has four shared electron pairs and one unshared pair, using five orbitals. (In PC15, eg, the transargononic phosphorus atom has five shared pairs in its outer shell.) However, because of the electroneutrality principle such a structure is allowed only for structure 1. Transargononic structures do not occur for first-row atoms, so this phenomenon is not found in NF3. These ideas concerning the bonding in NF3 and PF3 are implicit in the discussion by Marynick, Rosen and Liebman61 of the inversion barriers of these molecules. 

The compound Lajln has Tc = 10.4 K. Because La is hypoelectronic and In is hyperelectronic, I expect electron transfer to take place to the extent allowed by the approximate electroneutrality principle.13 The unit cube would then consist of 2 La, La, and In+, with In+ having no need for a metallic orbital and thus having valence 6 with the bonds showing mainly pivoting resonance among the twelve positions. The increase in valence of In and also of La (to 3 f ) and the assumption of the densely packed A15 structure account for the decrease in volume by 14.3%. Because the holes are fixed on the In + atoms, only the electrons move with the phonon, explaining the increase in Tc. 

The above statements are valid for monomolecular layers only. In the case of polymer films with layer thickness into the p-range, as are usually produced by electropolymerization, account must also be taken of the fact that the charge transport is dependent on both the electron exchange reactions between neighbouring oxidized and reduced sites and the flux of counterions in keeping with the principle of electroneutrality Although the molecular mechanisms of these processes... 

The electrochemical potential of single ionic species cannot be determined. In systems with charged components, all energy effects and all thermodynamic properties are associated not with ions of a single type but with combinations of different ions. Hence, the electrochemical potential of an individual ionic species is an experimentally undefined parameter, in contrast to the chemical potential of uncharged species. From the experimental data, only the combined values for electroneutral ensembles of ions can be found. Equally inaccessible to measurements is the electrochemical potential, of free electrons in metals, whereas the chemical potential, p, of the electrons coincides with the Fermi energy and can be calculated very approximately. 

When the Gibbs equation is used for an electrode-electrolyte interface, the charged species (electrons, ions) are characterized by their electrochemical potentials, while the interface is regarded as electroneutral that is, the surface density, 2, of excess charges in the metal caused by positive or negative adsorption of electrons ... 

---