Electrolytes atomic force microscopy measurement

Alternatively, one may employ colloidal probe atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure force distance curves such as the ones plotted in Fig. 5.1 [162]. The important difference between SFA and colloidal probe AFM experiments is that in the latter the entire force distance curve is accessible rather than only that portion satisfying Eq. (5.66) [163, 164]. In Ref. 164 a comparison is presented between theoretical and experimental data for confined poly-electrolyt.e systems. 

Butt, H.-J., Jaschke, M., and Ducker, W. 1995. Measuring surface forces in aqueous electrolyte solution with the atomic force microscopy, Bioelectrochem. Bioenergetics 38,191-201. 

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and electrochemical atomic force microscopy (ECAFM) have proven usefiil for the study of nucleation and growth of electrodeposited CP films on A1 alloy [59]. AFM was used to study adhesion between polypyrrole and mild steel [60], whereas electric force microscopy (EFM) has been used to study local variations in the surface potential (work function) of CP films [61]. AFM with a conductive tip permits a nanoscale AC impedance measurement of polymer and electrolyte interfaces, permitting differentiation between highly conductive amorphous regions and less-conductive crystalline regions of the CP film [62]. 

Direct measurement using atomic force microscopy has shown the presence of short-range repulsion or attraction solvation forces between colloidal particles. These forces reflect the finite size of the solvent molecules and are important only at certain values of pH and electrolyte concentrations. The distance... 

The reaction scheme of Bode [11] was derived by comparison of the X-ray diffraction patterns of the active materials with those for the model compounds. How the 8-Ni(OH)2 in battery electrodes differs from the model compound is discussed in Section 5.3.I.3. In recent years, the arsenal of in situ techniques for electrode characterization has greatly increased. Most of the results confirm Bode s reaction scheme and essentially all the features of the proposed a/y cycle. For instance, recent atomic force microscopy (AFM) of o -Ni(OH)2 shows results consistent with a contraction of the interlayer distance fiom 8.05 to 7.2 A on charge [61-63]. These are the respective interlayer dimensions for the model a-Ni(OH)2 and y-NiOOH compounds. Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (ECQM) measurements also confirm the ingress of alkali metal cations into the lattice upon the conversion of a-Ni(OH)2 to y-NiOOH [45,64,65]. However, in situ Raman and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) results on electrostretching modes that are consistent with a weakening of the O-H bond when compared with results for the model a- and 8-Ni(OH)2 compounds [66]. This has been ascribed to the delocalization of protons by intercalated water and Na ions. Similar effects have been seen in passive films on nickel in borate buffer electrolytes [67]. 

RLA occurs when repulsive forces are stronger than attractive forces. In addition to the electrical double layer force, under certain conditions of pH and electrolyte concentration, a thin hydration layer develops around the particle surface and results in short-range hydration repulsion, which could cause a reduction in collision efficiency between particles and leads to slow aggregation kinetics [44, 45]. Based on empirical models derived from force-distance measurements using atomic force microscopy, Runkana et al. [24] derived the following expression for hydration... 

---