Electrokinetics Fenton process

Kim JH, Han SJ, Kim SS, Yang JW. (2006). Effect of soil chemical properties on the remediation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil by electrokinetic-Fenton process. Chemosphere 63(10) 1667-1676. 

Kim SS, Kim JH, Han SJ. (2005). Application of the electrokinetic-Fenton process for the remediation of kaolinite contaminated with phenanthrene./oMma/ of Hazardous Materials 118(1-3) 121-131. 

Chen CD. (2000). A Study on In-SituTreatment of PCP Contaminated Soils by Electrokinetics-Fenton Process Combined With Biodegradation. MS Thesis, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (in Chinese). 

Oonnittan A, Shrestha RA, Sillanpaa M. (2008). Remediation of hexachlorobenzene in soil by enhanced electrokinetic Fenton process. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A 43(8) 894-900. 

Yang GCC, Long YW. (1998). Treatment of phenol-contaminated soil by electrokinetics-Fenton process. ACS Special Symposium on Emerging Technologies in Hazardous Waste Management X, Book of Abstracts, 21 ACS National Meeting, August 23-27, 1998, Boston, MA. 

Similarly, there are other chemical compounds used to remove organic compounds [17] electrokinetically enhanced persulfate oxidation of PCBs in low-permeability clayey soils, yielding 77.9 % degradation of PCBs with thermal activation after 7 days remediation of 1,2-dichloroethane contaminated soils using electro-kinetic-assisted nano FesOVSaOg processes, with a removal efficiency of more than 96 % after 14 days and degradation of sorbed hexachlorobenzene using an electrokinetic Fenton process. 

During the electrokinetic process, the electroos-motic flow can play the most important role in the removal of pollutants. To enhance the development of the treatment, an integration of the EK process with another treatment, such as the use of the Fenton process, could be adequate. 

Different authors have conducted research using the combination of electrokinetics with a Fenton process. First results were obtained by Long [36] where soils contaminated with phenol and 4-chlorophenol were treated. 1 vol/cm as the potential gradient and water as the processing fluid were the EK conditions used. Iron powder and FeS04 were used as a catalyst in the Fenton process. During treatment, the removal and destruction of the poUutants were observed. The degree of efficiency was dependent on the soil characteristics, the type of pollutants, and the catalyst. 

Yang GCC, Long YW. (1999a). Treatment of phenol contaminated soil by in-situ electrokinetic remediation and Fenton-like process. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Heavy Metals in the Environment and Electromigration Applied to Soil Remediation, July 7-9,1999, Lyngby, Denmark, pp. 65-70. 

Yang G, Long Y. (1999). Removal and degradation of phenol in a satnrated flow by in-situ electrokinetic remediation and Fenton-Uke process. Journal of Hazardous Materials 69 259-271. 

---