Electrochemical-potential charge variation

As usual, the slowest step controls the rate. The rate of such reactions is controlled by gradients in the chemical potential or, if there is a local variation in charge, by the electrochemical potential. 

The question may he asked how is this behavior modified at the electrochemical interface. That is, water molecule chemisorption may be sensitive to the presence of local electric fields or variations in the apphed electrochemical potential as a result of the molecular dipole. The response of water molecules to such a field has heen simulated hy Sanchez [63]. Variations in the local charge density on a cluster model for Ag(lll) were used to investigate this phenomenon. Polarization of the surface to 15 pC/cm was observed to produce a standing structure in which water molecules are hound via the oxygen atom, with the hydrogen atoms directed away fiom the surface in the normal direction. Consequently, the phenomenon known as dielectric saturation ensues, in which there exists a reduced dielectric constant at the interface, and, hence, electrostatic interactions across the metal/aque-ous interface become enhanced. 

The Chidsey-Murray model of redox conduction provides a reasonable first-order approach to quantitating conductivity in electroactive polymer films, since it considers intersite interactions as well as the variation of the electrochemical potential of the charge-compensating counterions with redox composition. The useful feature of the approach... 

A number of factors have to be considered in the choice of the intercalation compound, such as reversibility of the intercalation reaction, cell voltage, variation of the voltage with the state of charge, and availability and cost of the compound. Table 34.5 lists the key requirements for the intercalation materials and Table 34.6 presents some of the characteristics of the intercalation and other compounds that have been used in lithium rechargeable batteries. The electrochemical potentials of several lithium intercalation compounds versus those of lithium, metal and the variation of voltage with the amount of intercalation are shown in Fig. 34.2. 

It is important to emphasize that and W (which are both accessible to experimental measurement) are not, in general, spatially uniform over the metal surface. Different crystallographic planes are well known to have different eO values, and, thus, nontrivial variations in e

polycrystalline samples. It is important, however, to notice that their sum has to be spatially uniform (Eq. 36) since the electrochemical potential n or, equivalently, the Fermi level Ep is spatially uniform. This is true even when an electrical current is passing through the metal film under consideration, provided that thq ohmic drop in the film is negligible (less than a few millivolts), which is always the case with the conductive metal films and low currents employed in NEMCA studies. It is also important to notice that, by definition, W vanishes if there is no net charge on the metal surface under consideration. 

To date, most experiments with Au atomic contacts have been carried out at cryogenic temperatures or at room temperature in UHV, at ambient conditions in the gas phase, or in solution. Very few studies were reported in an electrochemical environment [205-208]. Electrochemical polarization offers the unique opportunity of tuning both the electrical and the mechanical properties of the respective atomic contacts by variation of the electrode potential. The electrodes could be charged and the local concentration of adsorbates at the atomic contacts can be varied in a rather controlled matter. 

Despite these arguments and the conceptual attractiveness of the procedure which is sketched in Fig. 1 convincing evidence for the relevance of a particular gas phase adsorption experiment can only be obtained by direct comparison to electrochemical data The electrode potential and the work function change are two measurable quantities which are particularly useful for such a comparison. In both measurements the variation of the electrostatic potential across the interface can be obtained and compared by properly referencing these two values 171. Together with the ionic excess charge in the double layer, which in the UHV experiment would be expressed in terms of coverage of the ionic species, the macroscopic electrical properties of the interracial capacitor can thus be characterized in both environments. 

In studying interfacial electrochemical behavior, especially in aqueous electrolytes, a variation of the temperature is not a common means of experimentation. When a temperature dependence is investigated, the temperature range is usually limited to 0-80°C. This corresponds to a temperature variation on the absolute temperature scale of less than 30%, a value that compares poorly with other areas of interfacial studies such as surface science where the temperature can easily be changed by several hundred K. This "deficiency" in electrochemical studies is commonly believed to be compensated by the unique ability of electrochemistry to vary the electrode potential and thus, in case of a charge transfer controlled reaction, to vary the energy barrier at the interface. There exist, however, a number of examples where this situation is obviously not so. 

---