Electrocatalysis direct fuel cells

Figure 17.4 Cartoon representation of strategies for studying and exploiting enzymes on electrodes that have been used in electrocatalysis for fuel cells, (a) Attachment or physisorption of an enzyme on an electrode such that redox centers in the protein are in direct electronic contact with the surface, (b) Specific attachment of an enzyme to an electrode modified with a substrate, cofactor, or analog that contacts the protein close to a redox center. Examples include attachment of the modifier via a conductive linker, (c) Entrapment of an enzyme within a polymer containing redox mediator molecules that transfer electrons to/from centers in the protein, (d) Attachment of an enzyme onto carbon nanotubes prepared on an electrode, giving a large surface area conducting network with direct electron transfer to each enzyme molecule.

The present chapter has presented a comprehensive review of electrode kinetic and catalytic aspects associated with methanol, ethanol, and formic acid oxidation. The prevalent point of view in selecting and organizing the vast amount of information in this area was that of practical applicability in order to advance the technology of direct fuel cells. Emphasis was placed on the catalytic system , starting with catalyst preparation methods and focusing on the interaction of catalyst/support/ionomer/chemical species. The development of catalytic systems was followed, from fundamental electrochemical and surface science studies to fuel cell experiments (whenever experimental data was available). Advances in both fundamental electrocatalysis and electrochemical engineering hold promise for the development of high-performance and cost-effective direct liquid fuel cells. 

Dinh FIN, Ren X, Garzon FTF, Zelenay P, Gottesfeld S. 2000. Electrocatalysis in direct methanol fuel cells in-situ probing of FTRu anode catalyst surfaces. J Electroanal Chem 491 ... 

The choice of immobilization strategy obviously depends on the enzyme, electrode surface, and fuel properties, and on whether a mediator is required, and a wide range of strategies have been employed. Some general examples are represented in Fig. 17.4. Key goals are to stabilize the enzyme under fuel cell operating conditions and to optimize both electron transfer and the efficiency of fuel/oxidant mass transport. Here, we highlight a few approaches that have been particularly useful in electrocatalysis directed towards fuel cell applications. 

DMFCs and direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs) are based on the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEM FC), where hydrogen is replaced by the alcohol, so that both the principles of the PEMFC and the direct alcohol fuel cell (DAFC), in which the alcohol reacts directly at the fuel cell anode without any reforming process, will be discussed in this chapter. Then, because of the low operating temperatures of these fuel cells working in an acidic environment (due to the protonic membrane), the activation of the alcohol oxidation by convenient catalysts (usually containing platinum) is still a severe problem, which will be discussed in the context of electrocatalysis. One way to overcome this problem is to use an alkaline membrane (conducting, e.g., by the hydroxyl anion, OH ), in which medium the kinetics of the electrochemical reactions involved are faster than in an acidic medium, and then to develop the solid alkaline membrane fuel cell (SAMFC). 

Several important energy-related applications, including hydrogen production, fuel cells, and CO2 reduction, have thrust electrocatalysis into the forefront of catalysis research recently. Electrocatalysis involves several physiochemical environmental dfects, which poses substantial challenges for the theoreticians. First, there is the electric potential which can aifect the thermodynamics of the system and the kinetics of the electron transfer reactions. The electrolyte, which is usually aqueous, contains water and ions that can interact directly with a surface and charged/polar adsorbates, and indirectly with the charge in the electrode to form the electrochemical double layer, which sets up an electric field at the interface that further affects interfacial reactivity. 

In this section, recent advances in the field of polymer electrolyte direct methanol fuel cells, i.e., PEFCs based on direct anodic oxidation of methanol are discussed. A schematic of such a ceU is shown in Fig. 48, together with the processes that take place in the cell. The DMFC has many facets, electrocatalysis materials and components which deserve a detailed treatment. The discussion here will be confined, however, to the very significant performance enhancement demostrated recently with polymer electrolyte DMFCs, and, as a result, to possible consideration of DMFCs as a nearer term technology. 

H. Wendt, C. Lamy, (eds). Abstracts volume of workshop for electrocatalysis in indirect and direct methanol fuel cells, Portorose, Solvenia, Sep. 12-14 (1999). 

Hamnett, A. Mechanism and electrocatalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell. Catalysis Today 1997, 38 (4), 445-457. 

---