Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Elastic surface behavior

A dynamic technique is described for obtaining surface elasticity (e0) vs. surface pressure (tt) curves which can be transformed into accurate tt—A curves for soluble monolayers. Small amplitude periodic area variations are used with a sufficiently high frequency to make monolayers effectively insoluble in the time of the experiment even though they behave as soluble in equilibrium measurements. plots are given for some nonionic surfactants. Straight line portions in these plots illustrate that surface interactions are too complex to be described by a Frumkin isotherm. In the limit of very low surface pressures there is no trace of an ideal gaseous region. Some examples show the implications of particular e0—rr curves for equilibrium and dynamic surface behavior. [Pg.281]

For hardness determination, different methods are possible scratching the surface, penetration of an indenter with static or dynamic loads, or rebound as a result of elastic material behavior. The methods with a penetrating indenter are the most important ones. The applied methods are distinguished, e.g., by the shape of the indenter. Brinell hardness is determined by a ball-shaped indenter, while Vickers hardness applies a pyramid-shaped one. After the indenting test with a certain load, the surface area of the indentation is measured which delivers a value for material hardness. Determination of Rockwell hardness uses the depth of the indentation instead of the surface area (Bargel and Schulze 1988). Independent of the method, the so-called surface hardness... [Pg.1192]

In this limit analysis of pile foundation, the ANSYS software was used. The finite element model was 1/4 body. The strength criterion of pile body material was linear elastic model, and the criterion of soils was Mohr-Coulomb equivalent area circle criterion. The mechanics characteristic of pile-soil interface was simulated by contact element. The contact surface behavior on the side of pile was the form of Rough. The contact surface behavior on pile toe was the form of No separation. [Pg.632]

If solvents are used, the fiber surface is slightly dissolved or swelled and the fibers form binding points that join the fibers directly without the need of convolutions or friction. Dry samples show an elastic deformation behavior up to a compression of 20% wet samples reach levels up to 45%. The deformation behavior is a prerequisite for press-fit usages in surgery while the compressive force levels ensure the scaffold s dimensional stability during handling, immersion, and surgery. [Pg.248]

Another issue of particular interest is the determination of the smallest size of a meniscus as a function of the tip geometry and the RH, which is relevant for the experimental results described before. Whatever the process involved, with a surface exhibiting an elastic-like behavior, the force at which the tip detaches from a surface, that is, the adhesion force measured, occurs when the tip reaches a critical contact area that corresponds to the smallest contact area between the tip and the meniscus. Therefore, the... [Pg.328]

For the moment, we shall not go into great detail about the compatibility conditions which the vectorial quantities must satisfy. In the above equations, the interface is considered to be a two-dimensional fluid medium. This consideration is by no means obligatory, though. We could also envisage interfaces with the behavior of an elastic surface, for example. This exploits the product pressure tensor by the strain rate tensor (see Chapter 3 of [PRU 12]). We retain the option of bringing these tensors into play in applications when it becomes necessary to do so. However, in the demonstrations given below, so as not to complicate the discussion, we shall suppose that the interface behaves like a fluid. [Pg.72]

Substances in this category include Krypton, sodium chloride, and diamond, as examples, and it is not surprising that differences in detail as to frictional behavior do occur. The softer solids tend to obey Amontons law with /i values in the normal range of 0.5-1.0, provided they are not too near their melting points. Ionic crystals, such as sodium chloride, tend to show irreversible surface damage, in the form of cracks, owing to their brittleness, but still tend to obey Amontons law. This suggests that the area of contact is mainly determined by plastic flow rather than by elastic deformation. [Pg.440]

A third definition of surface mobility is essentially a rheological one it represents the extension to films of the criteria we use for bulk phases and, of course, it is the basis for distinguishing states of films on liquid substrates. Thus as discussed in Chapter IV, solid films should be ordered and should show elastic and yield point behavior liquid films should be coherent and show viscous flow gaseous films should be in rapid equilibrium with all parts of the surface. [Pg.711]

Such nonequilihrium surface tension effects ate best described ia terms of dilatational moduh thanks to developments ia the theory and measurement of surface dilatational behavior. The complex dilatational modulus of a single surface is defined ia the same way as the Gibbs elasticity as ia equation 2 (the factor 2 is halved as only one surface is considered). [Pg.464]

Contact mechanics, in the classical sense, describes the behavior of solids in contact under the action of an external load. The first studies in the area of contact mechanics date back to the seminal publication "On the contact of elastic solids of Heinrich Hertz in 1882 [ 1 ]. The original Hertz theory was applied to frictionless non-adhering surfaces of perfectly elastic solids. Lee and Radok [2], Graham [3], and Yang [4] developed the theories of contact mechanics of viscoelastic solids. None of these treatments, however, accounted for the role of interfacial adhesive interactions. [Pg.75]

The simplified failure envelopes differ little from the concept of yield surfaces in the theory of plasticity. Both the failure envelopes (or surfaces) and the yield surfaces (or envelopes) represent the end of linear elastic behavior under a multiaxial stress state. The limits of linear elastic... [Pg.102]


See other pages where Elastic surface behavior is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.1077]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.204]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.230 ]




SEARCH



Elastic behavior

Elasticity, surface

Surface behavior

© 2024 chempedia.info