Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Efficiency drop coalescence

Drops coalesce because of coUisions and drainage of Hquid trapped between colliding drops. Therefore, coalescence frequency can be defined as the product of coUision frequency and efficiency per coUision. The coUision frequency depends on number of drops and flow parameters such as shear rate and fluid forces. The coUision efficiency is a function of Hquid drainage rate, surface forces, and attractive forces such as van der Waal s. Because dispersed phase drop size depends on physical properties which are sometimes difficult to measure, it becomes necessary to carry out laboratory experiments to define the process mixing requirements. A suitable mixing system can then be designed based on satisfying these requirements. [Pg.430]

There are many factors that determine whether a collision results in a coalescence. The processes by which two drops coalesce are those of film thinning and final rupture of the intervening film. These processes are determined by factors such as surfactants, mass transfer, surface tension gradients, physical properties, Van der Waals forces, and double-layer forces. In a turbulent flow field the situation is more involved.The droplets must first collide and remain in contact for a sufficient time for the coalescence to take place. A realistic coalescence efficiency will account for these factors. [Pg.218]

The Influence of Drop Coalescence on the Efficiency Coefficient of a Separator I 601... [Pg.601]

Several mathematical models have also been presented in the open literature to describe the drop coalescence rate [31, 49, 50, 56-62]. As in the case of the drop breakage rate, the drop coalescence rate can be expressed in terms of a collision frequency, u), and a Maxwellian efficiency term ... [Pg.223]

The overall rate of drop coalescence is related to the collision frequency of the drops and to the coalescence efficiency. By comparing drop collisions in agitated... [Pg.222]

The petroleum industry depends on efficient coalescence processing to remove aqueous brine drops in crude refinery feed streams to prevent severe corrosion of processing equipment. Control of mean drop size and drop size distribution (DSD) is vital to emulsification and suspension polymerization applications. Extraction processes depend on repeated drop coalescence and dispersion to accomplish the required mass transfer. [Pg.640]

Emulsion drop size is the result of competing effects that take place during emulsification the drop breakup and the drop coalescence processes. Many properties and phenomena are likely to influence one or the other effect, sometimes in a complex way. As the formulation approaches HLD = 0 the interfacial tension decreases, thus facilitating the drop breakup and the formation of smaller drops. In a concomitant way, the emulsion stability becomes extremely low, allowing rapid coalescence, which favors the occurrence of larger drops. As a consequence of these opposite effects, the drop size exhibits a minimum for each type of emulsion, i.e., on each side of HLD = 0. For each system, the location of the minimmn depends not only on the formulation (HLD value) but also on the stirring energy and efficiency [40]. [Pg.507]

An effective hquid-liquid reactor may be designed to obtain drops that continuously break up and coalesce, or it may be designed to obtain very small drops that have very efficient mass transfer and follow the continuous phase with a low rate of coalescence. The former will require a much larger reactor, but the separation of the phases after reaction is simpler. [Pg.351]

For flotation of oil drops by bubbles with diameters from 0.2 to 0.7 mm. the surface chemistry of drop/drop interactions as it relates to liquid coalescence and droplet breakup governs the overall performance of flotation. As the rate of dispersed oil coalescence increases, the overall oil removal efficiency for the process increases. Thus, if process improvement is desired, one should concentrate on pretreatrnent of the emulsion to improve the oil s coalescing properties. These ohservalins are consistent with Leech el at.1 who found that the most important variables governing induced-air flotation were chemical treatment (type and dose) and the system residence lime. Smaller air bubbles also increased the removal rate in our experimental range however, bubble si2e is not independently variable in the field. [Pg.222]

When liquid droplets are present in a gas stream, glass microfiber filter tubes can efficiently separate suspended liquids from gases. The filter tubes capture the fine droplets suspended in the gas and cause them to run together to form large drops within the depths of the filter tube. The large droplets are then forced by the gas flow to the downstream surface of the filter tube, from where the liquid drains by gravity. This process is called coalescing. [Pg.331]

The collection of the pyrolysis oils is difficult due to their tendency to form aerosols and also due to the volatile nature of many of the oil constituents. As the aerosols agglomerate into larger droplets, they can be removed by cyclonic separators. However, the submicron aerosols cannot be efficiently collected by cyclonic or inertial techniques, and collection by impact of the aerosols due to their Brownian or random motion must be utilized. A coalescing filter is relatively porous, but it contains a large surface area for the aerosol particles to impact by Brownian motion as they are swept through by the pyrolysis gases. Once the aerosol droplets impact the filter fibers, they are captured and coalesce into large drops that can flow down the fibers and be collected. [Pg.145]

If the solvent is nonvolatile, it can cause accumulation of heavy impurities in an extraction loop that are surface-active. Even in trace concentrations, these culprits can have a devastating effect on extractor performance. They can reduce the coalescing rates of drops—and thus reduce column capacity. Since most flooding models are based on pure-component tests, these models tend to be overly optimistic. Relative to a clean system, the presence of impurities can lower column capacity by 20% or more and efficiency by as much as 60%. [Pg.521]


See other pages where Efficiency drop coalescence is mentioned: [Pg.1480]    [Pg.1303]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.811]    [Pg.831]    [Pg.1484]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.943]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.1402]    [Pg.215]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.601 ]




SEARCH



Coalesce

Coalescence

Coalescence efficiency

Coalescent

Coalescents

Coalescer

Coalescers

Coalescing

Coalescing efficiency

Drop coalescence

© 2024 chempedia.info