Effects of Failures

Whereas no quantitative consequence analysis is required by this legislation, the process ha2ards analysis must include a quaHtative evaluation of the possible effects of failure of controls on employees. Details concerning development and implementation of programs for these subjects are available (37-39). 

Limitation of Effects of Failures Limitation can be done by equipment design or change in reaction conditions, rather than by adding on protective equipment. For example ... 

The closer one is to the failure, the more its direct effects are apparent. The cumulative effects of failure are often overlooked in the rush to fix the immediate problem. Too often, the cause of failure is ignored or forgotten because of time constraints or indifference. The failure or corrosion is considered just a cost of doing business. Inevitably, such problems become chronic associated costs, tribulations, and delays become ingrained. Problems persist until cost or concern overwhelm corporate inertia. A temporary solution is no longer acceptable the correct solution is to identify and eliminate the failure. Preventative costs are almost always a small fraction of those associated with neglect. 

Product function Potential failure mode Potential effects of failure... 

Potential Effects of Failure. What would be the eonsequenees of the eomponent, produet, proeess or system element failure ... 

FMEA examines each potential failure mode of a process to determine effects of failure on the system. A failure mode is anything that fails hardware. It may be a loss of function, unwanted function, out-of-tolerance condition, or a failure such as a leak. The significance of a failure mode depends on how the system responses to the failure. 

The analysis methods are similar for all external events probability of the external event, probability of failures, effects of failures on safety systems, and estimating the effects of failures for the workers, public and environment. 

Potential effects of failure in terms of what the customer might notice or experience... 

If sufficient data are available, much more information can be provided when different curves for various percentages of failure are plotted. Where such data are available, reasonable design criteria would be based on some probability for failure, depending on how critical the effects of failure occur. If a large, expensive repair of a complex mechanism would result from the fatigue failure of one product, then a 10 or even 1 % probability of failure would be a more likely design criterion than the 50% suggested above. 

Despite all the measures discussed above, chemicals manufacture will always involve some risk and will always rely to some extent on equipment integrity and appropriate operation. Limitation is the process of minimizing the effects of failure (of equipment or people) or an incident,... 

In the frames of the basic goal to protect the population from the harmful effects of failures, there are a number of measures to be implemented for the protection of and for the diminishing the consequences of failure on personnel and local inhabitants in areas with dangerous chemical production industry. More than 3,930 thousands of tons of hazardous chemical substances are stored or used in production activities of the 78 industrial plants that operate in the Zaporozhia region. These substances include over 0,9 thousands of tons of chlorine, over 1,831 thousands of tons of ammonia and about 1,101 thousands of tons of other hazardous chemicals. 

In summary, the inherently safer plant is user-friendly. Its design takes maximum advantage of the accumulated experience of the chemical industry and takes into consideration the fact that people must operate and maintain it. It is built so that opportunities for plant and people failures are minimized, so that the effects of those failures which do occur are minimized, and so that the effects of failures can be mitigated readily through adequate facilities and access for emergency response. 

These measures have one point in common, in that they do not limit the effect of failures by adding protective equipment, but instead by process design or changing the process conditions. It is a huge advantage in not needing to rely on protective equipment, but instead to make the process intrinsically safe. 

Concern over haphazard and unrecognized transfer of preponderance of evidence or more likely than not standards from the burden of persuasion to the burden of factual proof (burden of production) involves more than idle semantics. The adverse effects of failure to undertake a deliberate, two-step probabilistic analysis include (a) undue preference for particular probabilities of causation found in one epidemiologic study, especially when meta-analysis of multiple studies is not possible or available (b) unrecognized lowering of the burden of production with concomitant stiffening of the burden (standard) of persuasion (c) inappropriate fixation on simplistic quantitative rules such as the >50% likelihood rule and (d) poorly reasoned opinions because courts fail to explain exactly how they apply the >50%, more-likely than-not rule. 

The What if is designed for relatively uncomplicated processes. At each step in the process or reaction What if questions are asked and the answers are considered in evaluating the effects of failures of components or errors in the procedure (2). 

B. Effect of failure on other components and the whole system. 

Table 17.1 shows the aspects of process safety for which actions are required by OSHA in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910, Section 119 (29 CFR 1910.119) [1] and by the EPA in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 68 (40 CFR 68) [2]. This Chemical Process Safety section concentrates on the engineering aspects of Process Safety Information —on the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls and the qualitative evaluation of a range of the possible safety and health effects of failure of controls requirements of the OSHA and EPA Process Hazards Analysis and the Off-Site Hazard Assessment. ... 

A qualitative evaluation of safety and health effects of failure of controls. 

The Subsystem Design phase is the point where individual component concepts begin to form in compliance with the cascaded requirements from the vehicle specifications. There are a number of ways to achieve this end, but a systematic method will include a description of the system relative to external features, how critical these functions are and the effects of failure, the means of identifying and dealing with failure, and how the actions are to be confirmed. Typical tools used to act on these needs are briefly described below. 

Potential failure mode Potential effect of failure sev Potential cause/ mechanism of failure Occur Current design controls Detect RPN ... 

Notably, this solution is similar to that recovered for a moving point dislocation (Equation 1), but includes three important improvements the effect of failure in a mechanical process zone is incorporated, as are the influence of both dilation in the process zone and effect of a finite size penetrometer tip. Despite these additions, the approximate solution is not able to discriminate between pore pressures measured on tbe tip, shoulder, or shaft. Therefore although unable to differentiate between the response resulting from different tip geometries and locations, the most crucial components regulating the response are included. 

One way to mitigate the effects of failures is to introduce redimdancy into the system for the components that are most prone to failure. Typically, systems with redimdancy are designed so that when a single component fails, that component can be replaced without interrupting the operation of the system. The system will fail only when more than one failure occurs before the first failure can be repaired. Redundancy is commonly used for power supplies and fans. Networks such as the oversubscribed fat tree shown in Figure 2.12 have natural redimdancy in the links between two switching elements. If one element fails, traffic can be routed around the failed link, albeit at reduced performance. 

Effect of Failure of Structures or Components Not Required to be Designed for Tornado Loads... 

---