Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dynamics data, averages

HyperChem runs the molecular dynamics trajectory, averaging and analyzing a trajectory and creating the Cartesian coordinates and velocities. The period for reporting these coordinates and velocities is the data collection period At2. It is a multiple of the basic time step, At2 = n2 Atj, and is also referred to as a data step. The value n2 is set in the Molecular Dynamics options dialog box. [Pg.318]

Renwick and Lazarus (1998) analyzed the default UF for human variability based on the evaluation of an extensive database in relation to a subdivision of the 10-fold factor due to variability in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, as well as the adequacy of the 10-fold factor. Papers giving kinetic data were selected on the basis of the quality and/or size of the study, the interest of the results, and the physiological/metabolic process determining the kinetic parameter. Papers giving dynamic data were selected on the basis of the adequate separation of variability due to kinetics and dynamics. The data on kinetics and dynamics were tabulated, the coefficients of variation were averaged for different studies which measured a common endpoint, or for multiple doses which measured the same endpoint. [Pg.252]

Analysis of Stress—Optical Data. The slight, if indeed real, improvement of the isotropic model over the Takayanagi model would be of little consequence were it not for a more pronounced difference between the two models in their ability to describe the stress-optical data. When the parameters obtained from the dynamic data (Table IV) are substituted into Equations 8 and 9, Equation 8 produces results which are uniformly too low. Equation 9 also underestimates the magnitude of Ka but only by an average 7% (Figure 14). For most blends the discrepancy is less than 5%, and all calculated values show the characteristic elevation of the birefringence attributed to the multiphase structure. [Pg.220]

Analysis of the distribution of these components in the atmosphere requires an understanding of photochemistry and atmospheric dynamics. Unfortunately, current ideas about the rates of reactions in which these substances participate, about the coefficients of micro/macro-turbidity, and about local synoptic characteristics are limited by data averaged in time and space. As a result many authors have found ways of simplifying matters to overcome these information uncertainties. [Pg.253]

ASEP/MD, acronym for average solvent electrostatic potential obtained from molecular dynamics data, is a sequential QM/MM method that makes extensive use of the mean field approximation (MFA) [24], In solution, any static property A of the system must be calculated by averaging over the configurational space A defined by all the configurations thermally accessible to the system ... [Pg.138]

Predicting the solvent or density dependence of rate constants by equation (A3.6.29) or equation (A3.6.31) requires the same ingredients as the calculation of TST rate constants plus an estimate of and a suitable model for the friction coefficient y and its density dependence. While in the framework of molecular dynamics simulations it may be worthwhile to numerically calculate friction coefficients from the average of the relevant time correlation fiinctions, for practical purposes in the analysis of kinetic data it is much more convenient and instructive to use experimentally detemiined macroscopic solvent parameters. [Pg.849]

In numerous cases an atomically detailed picture is required to understand function of biological molecules. The wealth of atomic information that is provided by the Molecular Dynamics (MD) method is the prime reason for its popularity and numerous successes. The MD method offers (a) qualitative understanding of atomic processes by detailed analysis of individual trajectories, and (b) comparison of computations to experimental data by averaging over a representative set of sampled trajectories. [Pg.263]

They compared the PME method with equivalent simulations based on a 9 A residue-based cutoflF and found that for PME the averaged RMS deviations of the nonhydrogen atoms from the X-ray structure were considerably smaller than in the non-PME case. Also, the atomic fluctuations calculated from the PME dynamics simulation were in close agreement with those derived from the crystallographic temperature factors. In the case of DNA, which is highly charged, the application of PME electrostatics leads to more stable dynamics trajectories with geometries closer to experimental data [30]. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines has been published by Desemo and Holm [31]. [Pg.369]

You ch oosc Ih c viilucs Lo avcriigc iii Ih e Molten kir Dynamics Averages dialog hox. As you run a molecular dynamics simulaLion, IlyperChem stores data m a CSV lile. This file has the same name as the IIIN file containing the molecular system, plus the extension. fov. If the molecular system is not yet stored in a IIIX file, IlyperChem uses the filename chem.csv. [Pg.86]

Moli cii lar dynamics is csscn Lially a sLiidy of ih c evniiitioii in tim c of energetic and siniclnral molecular data. The data is often best represented as a graph of a molecular quantity as a function of iime. The values to be plotted can be any qnantity x that is being averaged over the trajectory, or the standard deviation. Dx. You can create as many as four simultaneous graphs at once. [Pg.323]

If the Bath relaxation constant, t, is greater than O.I ps, you should be able to calculate dynamic properties, like time correlation functions and diffusion constants, from data in the SNP and/or CSV files (see Collecting Averages from Simulations on page 85). [Pg.72]

Averaging and storage of data for a Monte Carlo run are carried out in much the same way as for molecular dynamics (see p. 318-324). [Pg.99]

HyperChem includes a number of time periods associated with a trajectory. These include the basic time step in the integration of Newton s equations plus various multiples of this associated with collecting data, the forming of statistical averages, etc. The fundamental time period is Atj s At, the integration time step stt in the Molecular Dynamics dialog box. [Pg.318]


See other pages where Dynamics data, averages is mentioned: [Pg.316]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.2589]    [Pg.2905]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.149]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.316 ]




SEARCH



Averaging data

Averaging, dynamics data

Averaging, dynamics data

Dynamic average

Dynamical averages

© 2024 chempedia.info