Dry disposal system

The physical reaction of the ash to aqueous leaching is an important factor when considering the potential contamination of groundwater by these leachates. Concentrations of elements in leachates will be determined by the amount of ash exposed to leaching solutions. Observations of this type are useful in determining the mode of disposal most suited for the ash being produced. For example, the WYO-FA sample would be better suited to a dry disposal system, with an occasional wetting, rather than the pond system which is most frequently used. 

In fact, fly ash disposal at thermal power plants is either through wet- or dry-disposal systems. As these disposal practices result in different characteristics of fly ashes [45], their interaction with alkali and hence, their zeohtization characteristics... 

The dry powder process has several additional advantages over the wet process. For example, much less waste of enamel occurs because the dry over-spray is airborne and recycled in a closed system. No-pidde ground coats have broadened the apphcation of both wet-process and dry-process systems. These enamels are appHed over cleaned-only metal. Thus the problems of disposing of pickling acid wastes containing iron sulfates and nickel wastes are eliminated (see Metal surface treatments) (7). 

Advantages The major advantages of the thermoplastic-based disposal systems are by dispiosin of the waste in a dry condition, the overall volume of the waste is greatly reduced most thermoplastic matrix materials are resistant to attack by aqueous solutions microbial degradation is minimal most matrices adhere well to incorporated materials, therefore, the final product has good strength and materials embedded in a thermoplastic matrix can be reclaimed if needed. 

The facility would use a dry scrubber system for emission control, which would eliminate the need for wastewater treatment. Any water from emission control and from decontamination procedures would be treated in the on-site groundwater treatment system. The residual soil and collected ash is assumed to be nonhazardous and can be disposed of in a solid waste disposal facility in compliance with subtitle D of RCRA. In the event that they cannot be delisted due to the presence of metals, the residuals will be managed as part of the closure of Area 2 shown in Figure 16.21 (lead-contaminated soil). 

It was apparent from the very earliest tests that control of thin moisture films on the surface of reactive particles was the key to success. The main three competing arrangements, as compared by Statnick et al. [4th Annual Pitt. Coal Conf. 1987)] involved slurry spray dryers, where lime and water were injected together, versus systems where the gas was humidified by water injection before or after injection of limey dry powder reagents. It turns out that there are tradeoffs among the costs of hardware, reagent, and water dispersion and reagent purchase and disposal. Systems where water evaporates in the presence of active particles are usually less expensive overall. 

Under certain conditions, such as high water temperatures, insufficient water supplies and problems of blowdown disposal, systems that depend on convection and use air as the transport medium may be preferable. The two types of dry cooling towers are the direct and indirect systems. Figures 4.21 and 4.22 show these systems in operation for nuclear station cooling. Indirect units use a surface or jet condenser at the turbine to condense exhaust steam. Water from the condenser is pumped to the dry tower for cooling and recirculation back to the condenser. In the direct system, steam is condensed in cooling coils without interfacing with a condenser. 

The field compaction studies were carried out in a relatively flat area, 2-3 km from the retorting operations (see Figure 2). The compaction site, measuring 55 m wide by 120 m long, was divided into two sections. In one section the retorted shale was placed dry in the other, optimum water was added before placement. The material was hauled directly from the retorted shale disposal system and spread as soon as possible. 

Just over 20% of the electricity generated in the United States is produced by nuclear power plants. In 1995, 32,200 metric tons of spent fuel, with a total activity of 30,200 MCi, was stored by the electric utilities at 70 sites (either in pools or in dry storage systems) (Ahearne 1997, Richardson 1997). By 2020, the projected inventory will be 77,100 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM) with a total activity of 34,600 MCi. Although the volume of the spent fuel is only a few percent of the volume of HLW, over 95% of the total activity (defense-related plus commercially generated waste) is associated with the commercially generated spent nuclear fuel (Crowley 1997). At present in the United States, none of the spent fuel will be reprocessed all is destined for direct disposal in a geological repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada (Hanks et al. 1999). 

Among variations in approaches for electrolyte measurements with ISEs is the Kodak Potentiometric Dry Chemistry System, where batchwise measurements are made on disposable slides. These are manufactured by coating an appropriate polymeric membrane over an internal reference gel layer on a conductive substrate. Slides for potassium, sodium, chloride and carbon dioxide are available. A drop of sample is placed on one half of the slide and a drop of reference solution on the other half. The drops are connected by an electrolyte bridge and the e.m.f. measured via metallic contacts. 

---