Drops mass transfers during

The total mass transfer during the passage of a drop is therefore obtained by integration of equation JO. 148 over the time of exposure. 

Equations which predict the volume or equivalent spherical diameter of a formed drop are not sufficient for extraction calculations, in the light of the very high rate of mass transfer during drop formation. It is desirable that the equation also lend itself to mathematical manipulation for the calculation of instantaneous interfacial area. To do this, the shape of the drop throughout the formation period must be defined. 

Mass transfer during formation of drops or bubbles at an orifice can be a very significant fraction of the total mass transfer in industrial extraction or absorption operations. Transfer tends to be particularly favorable because of the exposure of fresh surface and because of vigorous internal circulation during the formation period. In discussing mass transfer in extraction, it has become conventional (H12) to distinguish four steps (1) formation, (2) release, (3) free rise or fall, (4) coalescence. Free rise or fall has been treated in previous chapters. Steps 1 and 2 are considered here. 

In the following studies, the hydrodynamics and mass transfer during liquid-liquid flow with ionic liquids in channels with a range of diameters are presented. How patterns, as well as several hydrodynamic characteristics, such as plug length, plug velocity, film thickness, and pressure drop have been investigated. 

Hydrodynamics, pressure drop, and mass transfer during liquid-liquid flows were investigated in two different systems, viz. in glass microchannels with circular cross section of 0.2 mm ID (Fig. 3.3a, b) using an ionic liquid and deionised water, and in Teflon channels of different sizes, i.e. 0.2-2 mm ID (Fig. 3.3c) using either different TBP/ionic liquid mixtures (30 %, v/v) (Table 3.2) and aqueous nitric acid solutions, relevant to spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, or ionic Uquid and deionised water. The internal diameter of the microchannels was measured using a microscope (Nikon Eclipse ME 600). 

Mass transfer during drop formation can be quite significant. After formation the drop falls (or rises) through the continuous phase at its terminal velocity. Small drops (<2 mm), those in the presence of surfactants, or those for which the continuous-phase viscosity is much less than the drop viscosity behave as rigid spheres with little internal circulation. For this situation the continuous-phase coefficient can be obtained from correlations such as Eq. (2.4-38) indeed, much of the data for this correlation were obtained from evaporation rates of pure liquid drops in a gas. If no circulation is occurring within the drop, the mass transfer mechanism within the drop is that of transient molecular diflusion into a sphere for which solutions are readily available (see Section 2.3). 

Skelland and co-woikers have developed a procedure for the design of perforated plate extraction columns. This eliminates the need for experimentally measured stage efficiencies, which are usually costly and troublesome to obtain. Additionally, the validity of such efliciencies in scaled-up application is fir quently uncertain. Currently, the procedure involves use of rate equations for mass transfer during drop formation either at the perforations or at the end of jets issuing from the perforations, during ftee rise or fall of the drops, and during coalescence beneath Mcb i le, to locate a pseudoequilibtium curve. The latter is employed instead of the actual equilibrium curve on the - >a distribution diagram in a stepwise... 

Mass transfer during drop formation [7] whether the drops are formed at nozzles or orifices in plates or at the ends of jets and the presence or absence of interfacial turbulence or surfactants. Although fairly elaborate expressions have been devised to describe some of the data [62, 63], the great divergence of the data at present does not seem to warrant anything more than a simple estimate. The mass-transfer coefficient Kujj can be defined by [76]... 

Theoretical treatment of mass transfer during drop formation generally leads to expressions of the form... 

Product diameter is small and bulk density is low in most cases, except prilling. Feed hquids must be pumpable and capable of atomization or dispersion. Attrition is usually high, requiring fines recycle or recoveiy. Given the importance of the droplet-size distribution, nozzle design and an understanding of the fluid mechanics of drop formation are critical. In addition, heat and mass-transfer rates during... 

Thom JRS. Prediction of pressure drop during forced circulation boiling of water. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 7 709-724, 1964. 

Tests have been carried out on the rate of extraction of benzoic acid from a dilute solution in benzene to water, in which the benzene phase was bubbled into the base of a 25 mm diameter column and the water fed to the top of the column. The rate of mass transfer was measured during the formation of the bubbles in the water phase and during the rise of the bubbles up the column. For conditions where the drop volume was 0.12 cm3 and the velocity of rise 12.5 cm/s, the value of Kw for the period of drop formation was 0.000075 kmol/s m2 (kmol/m3), and for the period of rise 0.000046 kmol/s m2 (kmol/s m3). 

The verification of these models at higher flow rates has not been made. Hence they can be applied only in the ranges of conditions at which they have been tested. However, the model of Hayworth and Treybal (H5) has been found reasonably applicable for drop formation during spraying in the absence of mass transfer. 

Absorption of gases and vapour by drops has been studied by Garner and Kendrick(15) and Garner and Lane(16) who developed a vertical wind tunnel in which drops could be suspended for considerable periods of time in the rising gas stream. During the formation of each drop the rate of mass transfer was very high because of the high initial turbulence. After the initial turbulence had subsided, the mass transfer rate approached the rate for molecular diffusion provided that the circulation had stopped completely. In a drop with stable natural circulation the rate was found to approach 2.5 times the rate for molecular diffusion. 

There are two main periods of evaporation. When a drop is ejected from an atomiser its initial velocity relative to the surrounding gas is generally high and very high rates of transfer are achieved. The drop is rapidly decelerated to its terminal velocity, however, and the larger proportion of mass transfer takes place during the free-fall period. Little error is therefore incurred in basing the total evaporation time on this period. 

In the moving drop technique (also described in Chapters 7 and 9), a drop of the organic or aqueous phase is produced at the end of a vertical column filled with the other phase. The drop travels along the tube, during which extraction occurs across the drop surface. By measuring the time of traveling, the drop size, and from the volume of collected drops, it is possible to evaluate the rate of extraction (see Chapter 9 for a detailed discussion of drop behavior and mass transfer). 

The intensity of mass transfer shown by the mass transfer coefficient depends on the flow processes inside the drop or in its surroundings and, thereby, on the various life stages of the drops. During the drop formation, new interfaces and high concentration gradients are produced near the interface. The contact times between liquid elements of the drop and the surroundings that are near the surface are then extremely short. According to Pick s second law for unsteady diffusion, it follows that for the phase mass transfer coefficient [19] ... 

After the motion of the drops, their separation by coalescence follows. During this process, the mass transfer is negligibly small compared with that where the drops are in motion, if the continuous liquid is not fed directly into the coalescence region. However, such a technique should be avoided so as not to disturb the settling process. 

Finally, it must be noted that tensides that are adsorbed at the interface cause a stiffening of the interface. They hinder or even stop the inner circulation and oscillation of drops, and reduce the mass transfer intensity. Moreover, they form a barrier against the mass transfer, so that a further resistance term should be considered in the overall mass transfer process [28] in Eq. (9.33). Since the nature and concentration of tensides in industrial processes cannot be predicted, such phenomena cannot be taken into consideration during equipment calculations. 

---