Droplet size, reducing

Inversion of multiple w/o/w emulsions to o/w emulsions has been found to occur (28) only when the oil droplet size is reduced below a critical size or if the HLB of the emulsifiers approaches the required HLB of the oil phase. When these droplets were reduced in size below about 5 pm they no longer could accommodate an inner aqueous phase. Droplet size reduces with increasing concentrations of secondary surfactant (Fig. 2) which might, as Magdassi and co workers (28) point out, explain the results of Matsumoto et al (27). 

These factors make it necessary to reduce the amount of solvent vapor entering the flame to as low a level as possible and to make any droplets or particulates entering the flame as small and of as uniform a droplet size as possible. Desolvation chambers are designed to optimize these factors so as to maintain a near-constant efficiency of ionization and to flatten out fluctuations in droplet size from the nebulizer. Droplets of less than 10 pm in diameter are preferred. For flow rates of less than about 10 pl/min issuing from micro- or nanobore liquid chromatography columns, a desolvation chamber is unlikely to be needed. 

However, in the case of mini- and microemulsions, processing methods reduce the size of the monomer droplets close to the size of the micelle, leading to significant particle nucleation in the monomer droplets (17). Intense agitation, cosurfactant, and dilution are used to reduce monomer droplet size. Additives like cetyl alcohol are used to retard the diffusion of monomer from the droplets to the micelles, in order to further promote monomer droplet nucleation (18). The benefits of miniemulsions include faster reaction rates (19), improved shear stabiHty, and the control of particle size distributions to produce high soHds latices (20). 

Finally, some general rules for the amount of surfactant appear to be vaHd (13). For anionic surfactants the average size of droplets is reduced for an increase of surfactant concentration up to the critical micellization concentration, whereas for nonionic surfactants a reduction occurs also for concentrations in excess of this value. The latter case may reflect the solubiHty of the nonionic surfactant in both phases, causing a reduction of interfacial tension at higher concentrations, or may reflect the stabilizing action of the micelles per se. 

Microemulsion and miniemulsion polymerization processes differ from emulsion polymerization in that the particle sizes are smaller (10-30 and 30-100 nm respectively vs 50-300 ran)77 and there is no discrete monomer droplet phase. All monomer is in solution or in the particle phase. Initiation usually takes place by the same process as conventional emulsion polymerization. As particle sizes reduce, the probability of particle entry is lowered and so is the probability of radical-radical termination. This knowledge has been used to advantage in designing living polymerizations based on reversible chain transfer (e.g. RAFT, Section 9.5.2)." 2... 

Research on water explosion inhibiting systems is providing an avenue of future protection possibilities against vapor cloud explosions. British Gas experimentation on the mitigation of explosions by water sprays, shows that flame speeds of an explosion may be reduced by this method. The British Gas research indicates that small droplet spray systems can act to reduce the rate of flame speed acceleration and therefore the consequential damage that could be produced. Normal water deluge systems appear to produce too large a droplet size to be effective in explosion flame speed retardation and may increase the air turbulence in the areas. 

The particle beam interface [55] borrowed and built upon some of the key elements and concepts of its predecessors. Eluent from the HPLC was nebulized into a spray of small droplets by a flow of helium. The spray of droplets entered a heated chamber where evaporative processes further reduced the droplet size creating an aerosol. The next step of the process involved the spraying of the aerosol (i.e., the... 

The influence of liquid density on the mean droplet size is relatively small but complex. An increase in liquid density may reduce the mean droplet size due to a decrease in sheet thickness at the atomizing lip of a prefilming atomizer, or due to an increase in the relative velocity between liquid and air for a plain-jet atomizer. However, increasing liquid density may also increase the mean droplet size because a liquid sheet may extend further downstream of the atomizing lip of a prefilming atomizer so that the sheet breakup may take place at lower relative velocity between liquid and air. 

Some quantitative studies1498115011 on droplet size distribution in water atomization of melts showed that the mean droplet size increases with metal flow rate and reduces with water flow rate, water velocity, or water pressure. From detailed experimental studies on the water atomization of steel, Grandzol and Tallmadge15011 observed that water velocity is a fundamental variable influencing the mean droplet size, and further, it is the velocity component normal to the molten metal stream Uw sin , rather than parallel to the metal stream, that governs the mean droplet size. This may be attributed to the hypothesis that water atomization is an impact and shattering process, while gas atomization is predominantly an aerodynamic shear process. 

---