Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Droplet-matrix morphology, polymer blends

Blends 3 (a,b,c) Rheologically Robust Matrix and Weak Dispersed Components Since PE 1409 is a low viscosity nearly Newtonian polymer melt, its dispersive behavior is uncomplicated and more Newtonian like. Blend 3a forms a small (3-5-pm) droplet dispersion morphology, and Blend 3b is even finer (1-2 pm), becoming, only below 2% concentration, less subject to flow-induced coalescence. The TSMEE-obtained dispersions are finer than those from the TSMEE, with a variety of kneading elements (126). What is noteworthy about these blends is the early stages of the dispersion process, shown on Fig. 11.44, obtained with Blend 3a using the TSMEE at 180°C and 120 rpm. [Pg.667]

Even though fillers are usually introduced into polymer blends of droplet-matrix morphology, a few reports dealing with filled co-continuous blends can be found in the... [Pg.37]

The majority of polymer blends containing elastomeric, thermoplastic, and/or liquid crystalline polymers are processed by melt extrusion at some point in their history. After melt extrusion with intensive mixing, the morphology of an immiscible polymer blend on a microscopic scale will often consist of a dispersed phase of the more viscous polymer in a continuous matrix of the less viscous polymer (depending upon the relative amounts and viscosities of the two polymers in the blend). A good analogy from everyday experience is a dispersed mixture of viscous oil droplets in an immiscible water matrix. [Pg.519]

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is one of the very useful microscopic methods for the morphological and structural analysis of materials. Larena et al. classified nanopolymers into three groups (1) self-assembled nanostructures (lamellar, lamellar-within-spherical, lamellar-within-cylinder, lamellar-within-lamellar, cylinder within-lamellar, spherical-within-lamellar, and colloidal particles with block copolymers), (2) non-self-assembled nanostructures (dendrimers, hyperbranched polymers, polymer brushes, nanofibers, nanotubes, nanoparticles, nanospheres, nanocapsules, porous materials, and nano-objects), and (3) number of nanoscale dimensions [uD 1 nD (thin films), 2 nD (nanofibers, nanotubes, nanostructures on polymeric surfaces), and 3 nD (nanospheres, nanocapsules, dendrimers, hyperbranched polymers, self-assembled structures, porous materials, nano-objects)] [153]. Most of the polymer blends are immiscible, thermodynamically incompatible, and exhibit multiphase structures depending on the composition and viscosity ratio. They have two types of phase morphology sea-island structure (one phase are dispersed in the matrix in the form of isolated droplets, rods, or platelets) and co-continuous structure (usually formed in dual blends). [Pg.25]

There exist in polymer blends two or three major types of phase morphologies, depending on whether the encapsulated structures (composite droplets) are considered as a class apart. The most common is the droplet-in-matrix (as, for example, Figure 1.3), the (droplet-in-droplet)-in-matrix (as, for example. Figure 1.4), and the cocontinuous phase morphology where both phases are mutually interconnected throughout the whole volume of the blend (as, for example. Figures 1.5 and 1.6). [Pg.7]

In the present chapter, the morphology development of immiscible binary polymer blends is discussed. First, morphology development in droplet-matrix structures is described. Subsequently, the dynamics of fibrillar structures is reviewed and finally cocontinuous structures are briefly discussed. Although the main aspects of polymer blending are well established and polymer blends are already widely used in commercial products, recent novel insights in the areas of miniaturization and particle stabilization have opened new research topics in the area of polymer blending. In the last part of this chapter, these recent advances in polymer blend systems are briefly discussed. [Pg.349]

A droplet-in-matrix phase morphology developed in immiscible polymer blends depends on the viscoelastic properties and composition of the two components of the blend in the melt state. The rheological formalism used for the non-Newtonian phases as polymer melts follows, with adjustment of the... [Pg.419]

As discussed Sect. 10.3.2, in the molten state, and with no effect of elongational shear, the morphology of blends of LCP and thermoplastics consist of near-spherical droplets of PC in the matrix polymer (see Fig. 10.1). [Pg.251]


See other pages where Droplet-matrix morphology, polymer blends is mentioned: [Pg.243]    [Pg.828]    [Pg.6262]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.279]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Blend morphology

Blended matrices

Blending, morphology

Droplet morphology

Droplet/matrix morphology

Matrix droplets

Morphological Matrix

Polymer blend morphology

Polymer droplet

Polymer matrices

Polymer morphology

© 2024 chempedia.info