Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Double cantilever bend

Figure 9.7 Schematic illustration of relation between strain energy release rate G and delamination crack growth rates as established via tests on standard geometry double cantilever bend and edge notched flexure samples, showing threshold for growth at G and static fracture at G = Gic-... Figure 9.7 Schematic illustration of relation between strain energy release rate G and delamination crack growth rates as established via tests on standard geometry double cantilever bend and edge notched flexure samples, showing threshold for growth at G and static fracture at G = Gic-...
Atomic force microscopes have been built in many different versions, with at least six different ways of measuring the deflection of the cantilever [36, 37, 40-42], The commercially available AFM systems use the double photo detector system shown in Figure 7.17 and described by Meyer and Amer [44], Here, a lens focuses a laser beam on the end of the cantilever, which reflects the beam onto two photo detectors which measure intensities T and f2. When the cantilever bends towards the surface, detector 2 receives more light and the difference (h — h) becomes larger. If the tip is scanned over the sample by means of the x- and y-components of the piezo crystal, the difference signal (T — h)/(h + h)... [Pg.200]

BENDING OF A BEAM. The complex dynamic Young s modulus can be determined from the forced, non-resonant oscillations of a single or double cantilever beam. The apparatus considered in this paper is the Dynamic Mechanical Thermal Analyzer (DMTA) (6), manufactured by Polymer Laboratories, Inc. Figure 3 shows the experimental setup for the single cantilever measurement. A thin sample is clamped at both ends. One end is attached to a calibrated shaker through a drive shaft. [Pg.52]

The standard testing for SCC has been reviewed by Sedriks [9] and Turnbull [10]. The following techniques have been used to estimate the SCC surface flawed, cantilever bend, creviced bent-beam tests, double cantilever beam, and compact tension specimens. [Pg.367]

Zirconium and its alloys are susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in such environments as Fe - or Cu -containing chloride solution, CH3OH -H hahdes, concentrated HNO3, halogen vapors, and liquid mercury or cesium [4,5]. Common test methods, e.g., U-bend, C-ring, split ring, direct tension, double cantilever, and slow strain rate tension, have been used to determine zirconium s susceptibility to SCC. [Pg.613]

A recent use of equation (5.73) to determine K,c values as a function of grain size for alumina compares results to notched beam tests. The broken arms of the beams were used for the indentation-strength in bending test (ISB). Thus a good comparative study was possible. Figure 5.16 shows the close correspondence between the ISB results and the earlier results of Rice et using a double cantilever beam method. [Pg.99]

Fracture then occurs in an elastic-plastic rather than a purely elastic strain field. For example, in the double cantilever beam test (Figure 12.4) the maximum bending stress is CT = 7>GcE where b is the width of the beam. Hence, the critical width for the transition from yielding to brittle failure is... [Pg.420]

Fig. 8. Double cantilever beam specimen under uniform bending. Fig. 8. Double cantilever beam specimen under uniform bending.
A number of stress intensity factor solutions have been developed over the years. Several solutions are given in the review article by Hutchinson and Suo [ 19]. One example is the stress intensity factors for a bimaterial double cantilever beam subjected to uniform bending (Fig. 8). In this case... [Pg.58]

Fig. 13. A symmetrical, double-cantilever beam with each arm of thickness h, subjected to a pure bending moment M. Fig. 13. A symmetrical, double-cantilever beam with each arm of thickness h, subjected to a pure bending moment M.
Fig. 14. The critical bending moment plotted as a function of joint toughness for three different values of a/A for a symmetrica) double-cantilever beam. The solid line represents the analytical... Fig. 14. The critical bending moment plotted as a function of joint toughness for three different values of a/A for a symmetrica) double-cantilever beam. The solid line represents the analytical...
Fig. 18. Average values of the steady-state radii of curvature for symmetrical double-cantilever beams (1.0. 2.0, 3.0 mm thick) separated by wedges of different sizes being in.sertcd into the interface. A comparison is made between the experimental observations and the predictions of the cohesive-zone model using values of Ti, = 1.4 kJm and d = 100 MPa. The dotted line represents the analytical predictions based on beam-bending theory [58]. Fig. 18. Average values of the steady-state radii of curvature for symmetrical double-cantilever beams (1.0. 2.0, 3.0 mm thick) separated by wedges of different sizes being in.sertcd into the interface. A comparison is made between the experimental observations and the predictions of the cohesive-zone model using values of Ti, = 1.4 kJm and d = 100 MPa. The dotted line represents the analytical predictions based on beam-bending theory [58].
This spin label acts as a rigid cantilever, attached to the DNA molecule, and therefore allows a very precise determination of the conformational flexibility of double-stranded DNA as stretching, twisting, and bending [114],... [Pg.187]


See other pages where Double cantilever bend is mentioned: [Pg.190]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.458]   


SEARCH



Cantilever bending

Cantilevers

© 2024 chempedia.info