Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Distribution function fractal structures

In our opinion, this book demonstrates clearly that the formalism of many-point particle densities based on the Kirkwood superposition approximation for decoupling the three-particle correlation functions is able to treat adequately all possible cases and reaction regimes studied in the book (including immobile/mobile reactants, correlated/random initial particle distributions, concentration decay/accumulation under permanent source, etc.). Results of most of analytical theories are checked by extensive computer simulations. (It should be reminded that many-particle effects under study were observed for the first time namely in computer simulations [22, 23].) Only few experimental evidences exist now for many-particle effects in bimolecular reactions, the two reliable examples are accumulation kinetics of immobile radiation defects at low temperatures in ionic solids (see [24] for experiments and [25] for their theoretical interpretation) and pseudo-first order reversible diffusion-controlled recombination of protons with excited dye molecules [26]. This is one of main reasons why we did not consider in detail some of very refined theories for the kinetics asymptotics as well as peculiarities of reactions on fractal structures ([27-29] and references therein). [Pg.593]

Finally, we have discussed other interesting problems related to the presence of a heterogeneous distribution of reactive centres, localized on a fractal submanifold. A complete theory of the influence of a nonuniform distribution of reactive centres on a fractal structure is still not available. In any case. Green function renormalization is the most convenient way to approach this issue rigorously. [Pg.250]

Although the CPE and fractal systems give the same impedance in the absence of redox reactions, a comparison of Eq. (8.9) for the CPE model with Eq. (8.17) for a fractal system in the presence of a redox reaction shows that they are structurally different. In fact, they produce different complex plane and Bode plots. This is clearly visible from Fig. (8.9), which can be compared with Fig. 8.4 for the CPE model. With a decrease in the value of , an asymmetry on the complex plane plot occurs that is also visible oti the phase angle Bode plots. This is related to the different topology of the equivalent circuits they are compared in Fig. 8.10. In the CPE model, only the impedance of the double-layer capacitance is taken to the power while in the fractal model the whole electrode impedance is taken to the power (p. The asynunetiy of the complex plane and Bode plots for fractal systems arises from the asymmetric distribution function of time constants in Eq. (8.4) according to the equation [298, 347]... [Pg.185]

Figure 2.26. Summary of variations in the structural boundary fractal of two populations of carbonblack profiles [38]. a) Tracings of profiles of two carbonblack populations produced by different methods, b) Distribution functions of the structural boundary fractal dimensions for... Figure 2.26. Summary of variations in the structural boundary fractal of two populations of carbonblack profiles [38]. a) Tracings of profiles of two carbonblack populations produced by different methods, b) Distribution functions of the structural boundary fractal dimensions for...
It is possible to deduce from the scaling law Eq. (2.83) the fractal dimension of expanded chains, as well as characteristic properties of the pair distribution function and the structure function. The fractal dimension d follows from the same argument as applied above for the ideal chains, by estimating the average number of monomers included in a sphere of radius r which is now given by... [Pg.48]

As pointed out in the introductory section evaluation of wettability at the level of a network presuposes knowledge of the distribution function of pore sizes. This function can be derived theoretically provided that some assumptions can be made about the structure of the porous medium. One possibility is to assume that the medium is a (deterministic) fractal. A number of recent papers support the hypothesis, that at least some reservoir rocks are indeed fractal (cf. Sen et al., 1981 Katz et al., 1985 Wong, 1987 Hansen et al., 1988). [Pg.240]

Fractals in electrochemistry — Figure. A von Koch curve of Df = 1.5. Note that no characteristic length of the structures can be identified -this is associated with the fact that the size-distribution of the features of the curves is a power-law function... [Pg.278]

Our third applications example highlights the work of Nakano et al. in modeling structural correlations in porous silica. MD simulations of porous silica in the density range 2.2—0.1 g/cm were carried out on a 41,472-particle system using an iPSC/860. Internal surface area, ratio of pore surface to volume, pore size distribution, fractal dimension, correlation length, and mean particle size were determined as a function of the density, with the structural transition between a condensed amorphous phase and a low density porous phase characterized by these quantities. Various dissimilar porous structures with different fractal dimensions were obtained by controlling the preparation schedule and the temperature. [Pg.274]

The generation parameter defining the generation of ionizing trajectories in the self-similar structure in Fig. 10 is related to the number w of encounters of the two electrons at ri = T2 rather than to the ionization time. This interpretation is confirmed in Fig. 11 which shows the density n of trajectories starting with initial conditions uniformly distributed in the middle panel of Fig. 10 as function of the number w of encounters of the two electrons and of the ionization time T. The density n is proportional to minus the derivative of the survival probability with respect to the relevant variable (w or T). The logarithmic plot in Fig. 11a reveals an exponential decay of the density, n(w)ocexp(—0.27w), and hence also of the survival probability, as a function of the number of encounters of the two electrons, just as expected for a self-similar fractal set of trapped trajectories. The doubly logarithmic plot of the density of trajectories in Fig. 11b reveals a power-law decay of the density, (T) oc and hence... [Pg.118]

FIGURE 14.12 Polydispersity factor Cp for the large qR, power law regime of the structure factor S q) = cCp(qRg for an ensemble of clusters as a function of the width parameter T of the scahng size distribution for three values of the fractal dimension D. (From Sorensen, C.M. and Wang, G.M., Phys. Rev. E, 60, 7143, 1999. With permission.)... [Pg.642]


See other pages where Distribution function fractal structures is mentioned: [Pg.616]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.3277]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.1731]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.465]   


SEARCH



Fractal distribution

Fractal structure

Fractals functions

Structural distributions

© 2024 chempedia.info