Distillation capital cost

Distillation capital costs. The classic optimization in distillation is to tradeoff capital cost of the column against energy cost for the distillation, as shown in Fig. 3.7. This wpuld be carried out with distillation columns operating on utilities and not integrated with the rest of the process. Typically, the optimal ratio of actual to minimum reflux ratio lies in the range 1.05 to 1.1. Practical considerations often prevent a ratio of less than 1.1 being used, as discussed in Chap. 3. 

Another variable that needs to be set for distillation is refiux ratio. For a stand-alone distillation column, there is a capital-energy tradeoff, as illustrated in Fig. 3.7. As the refiux ratio is increased from its minimum, the capital cost decreases initially as the number of plates reduces from infinity, but the utility costs increase as more reboiling and condensation are required (see Fig. 3.7). If the capital... 

If complex distillation columns are being considered, then these also can bring about significant reductions in capital cost. The dividing-wall column shown in Fig. 5.17 not only requires typically 20 to 30 percent less energy than a conventional arrangement but also can be typically 30 percent lower in capital cost than a conventional two-column arrangement. ... 

Reboiler. The case shown in Figure 8 is common for reboilers and condensers on distillation towers. Typically, this AThas a greater impact on excess energy use in distillation than does reflux beyond the minimum. The capital cost of the reboiler and condenser is often equivalent to the cost of the column they serve. 

The concept of an optimum reboiler or condenser AT relates to the fact that the value of energy changes with temperature. As the gap between supply and rejection widens, the real work in a distillation increases. The optimum AT is found by balancing this work penalty against the capital cost of bigger heat exchangers. 

The most volatile product (myristic acid) is a small fraction of the feed, whereas the least volatile product (oleic—stearic acids) is most of the feed, and the palmitic—oleic acid split has a good relative volatility. The palmitic—oleic acid split therefore is selected by heuristic (4) for the third column. This would also be the separation suggested by heuristic (5). After splitting myristic and palmitic acid, the final distillation sequence is pictured in Figure 1. Detailed simulations of the separation flow sheet confirm that the capital cost of this design is about 7% less than the straightforward direct sequence. 

As an example, the battery-limits capital cost can be estimated for the production of 10,000 t/yr of ethylene (qv) from ethanol (11). Seven processing blocks, ie, vaporizer, reactor, water quench, compressor, dryer, distillation, and energy recovery, can be identified. The highest temperature is 350°C (reactor), and the highest pressure is about 1.7 MPa (17 atm) (compressor, two towers). If a materials-pressure factor, + of 1.03 is assumed, then for N = 7 0 = 0.87 1/0 = 1 64 and f =0 K = 6.3. This gives the 1981 cost as 4.4 X 10 . The 1991 battery-Hmits investment can be obtained, by updating with the CE Plant Cost Index, as 5.3 x 10 . ... 

Relatively low capital cost Relatively small space requirements Ability to collect particulates as well as gases Collected substances may be recovered by distillation... 

Vapor Permeation Vapor permeation is similar to vapor perva-poration except that the feed stream for permeation is a gas. The futnre commercial viability of this process is based npon energy and capital costs savings derived from the feed already being in the vapor-phase, as in fractional distillation, so no additional heat inpnt wonld be req iired. Its foreseen application areas wonld be the organics recov-eiy from solvent-laden vapors and pollntion treatment. One commercial nnit was installed in Germany in 1989 (Ref. 26). 

It should be emphasized that the factors in Table 2.2 are average and only approximate and will vary, amongst other things, according to the type of equipment. As an example, consider the effect of materials of construction on the capital cost of distillation columns. Table 2.3 gives materials of construction cost factors for distillation columns. 

Table 2.3 Typical materials of construction capital cost factors for pressure vessels and distillation columns9,10.

---