Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Direct-current glow-discharge spectrometry

M. Vazquez Pelaez, J. M. Costa-Fernandez, R. Pereiro, N. Bordel and A. Sanz-Medel, Quantitative depth profile analysis by direct current glow discharge time of flight mass spectrometry, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 18,2003, 864-871. [Pg.50]

Oksenoid K. G., Liebich V. and Pietsch G. (1996) Improvement of analyte to interferent line intensity ratio in direct current glow discharge mass spectrometry, Fresenius Z Anal Chem 355 863-865. [Pg.344]

Dong, C. Wang, W. Li, H., Atmospheric pressure air direct current glow discharge ionization source for ion mohihty spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 3925-3930. [Pg.89]

Schelles, W, De Gendt, S., Maes, K., Van Grieken, R.V. (1996) The use of a secondary cathode to analyse solid non-conducting samples with direct current glow discharge mass spectrometry potential and restrictions. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 355, 858-860. [Pg.932]

Martin, A., Pereiro, R., Bordel, N., Sanz-Medel, A. (2007) Microsecond pulsed versus direct current glow discharge as ion sources for analytical glow discharge-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 22,1179-1183. [Pg.933]

Table 8.60 shows the main features of GD-MS. Whereas d.c.-GD-MS is commercial, r.f.-GD-MS lacks commercial instruments, which limits spreading. Glow discharge is much more reliable than spark-source mass spectrometry. GD-MS is particularly valuable for studies of alloys and semiconductors [371], Detection limits at the ppb level have been reported for GD-MS [372], as compared to typical values of 10 ppm for GD-AES. The quantitative performance of GD-MS is uncertain. It appears that 5 % quantitative results are possible, assuming suitable standards are available for direct comparison of ion currents [373], Sources of error that may contribute to quantitative uncertainty include sample inhomogeneity, spectral interferences, matrix differences and changes in discharge conditions. [Pg.651]

De Gendt S., Van Grieken R., Hang W. and Harrison W. W. (1995) Comparison between direct current and radiofrequency glow discharge mass spectrometry for the analysis of oxide-based samples, J Anal At Spectrom 10 689—695. [Pg.345]


See other pages where Direct-current glow-discharge spectrometry is mentioned: [Pg.478]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.4672]    [Pg.1188]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.669]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.617 ]




SEARCH



Current directions

Discharge current

Glow

Glow discharge

Glow discharge direct current

Glow-discharge spectrometry

© 2024 chempedia.info