Dimroth-Reichardt empirical paramete

In organic synthesis, the solvent s polarity plays an important role. Dimroth and Reichardt developed a elassifieation based on the normalized empirical parameter of solvent polarity,, given by the following equation ... 

Turning to the K, and Kj parameters, we have observed that these are relatively insensitive to the identity of the solute, but that they depend upon the cosolvent, whose polarity is a controlling factor. Table 5.5.3 gives some empirical correlations that provide routes to the prediction of Kj and KjKj. In Table 5.5.3, Pm is the 1-octanol/water partition coefficient of the pure cosolvent,and Ef is the Dimroth-Reichardt solvatochromic polarity parameter. We thus have the capability of predicting gA, Kj, and K,K2, which extends the utility of eq. [5.5.23] from the merely descriptive to the predictive. 

Table 1.4 Solvent descriptors of organic solvents commonly used for biocatalysis. Sw/o (solubility of water in solvent, wt%) So/w (solubility of solvent in water, wt%) and e (dielectric constant) values from [78], log P (P = partition coefficient between octanol and water), ET (empirical polarity parameter by Reichardt-Dimroth) and HS (Hildebrand solubility parameter, )l, cm J, ) from [79].

Of the many empirical polarity parameters or indexes that have been proposed, only a few remain viable, in the sense that they are currently more or less widely used to describe the polarity of solvents for various purposes. Some such parameters that are commonly used describe better other, more specific, properties than polarity e.g., hydrogen bond or electron-pair donation ability. Thus, only two polarity parameters have been employed in recent years Dimroth and Reichardt s A T(30) (Dimroth et al. 

The extraction (and hence the transport) efficiency depends on several diluent factors such as Schmidt empirical diluent parameter [124,125], the Swain s acity and basity parameters along with the Dimroth and Reichardt polarity indices [126], dielectric constant [127], refractive index [127] and viscosity [127], and the Hildebrand s solubility parameter [128]. The permeability coefficients (Paio) were computed from the Wlke-Chang, Scheibel, and Ratcliff [129,130] equations, which compared reasonably well with the experimentally determined values as shown in Table 31.10. Efiiassadi and Do [131] have, on the other hand, taken into account only the viscosity and solubility effect of the diluent and the carrier immobilized in SLM. They have reported that these two factors influenced the transport rates significantly. 

Over the last few years, the development of solvents of desired properties with a particular use in mind has been challenging. To evaluate the behaviour of a liquid as solvent, it is necessary to understand the solvation interactions at molecular level. In this vein, it is of interest to quantify its most relevant molecular-microscopic solvent properties, which determine how it will interact with potential solutes. An appropriate method to study solute-solvent interactions is the use of solvatochromic indicators that reflect the specific and non-specific solute-solvent interactions on the UV-Vis spectral band shifts. In this sense, a number of empirical solvatochromic parameters have been proposed to quantify molecular-microscopic solvent properties. In most cases, only one indicator is used to build the respective scale. Among these, the E (30) parameter proposed by Dimroth and Reichardt [23] to measure solvent dipolarity/polarisability which is also sensitive to the solvent s hydrogen-bond donor capability. On the other hand, the n, a and P (Kamlet, Abboud and Taft)... 

---