Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusive flux mass diffusivity estimate

The extension of ideal phase analysis of the Maxwell-Stefan equations to nonideal liquid mixtures requires the sufficiently accurate estimation of composition-dependent mutual diffusion coefficients and the matrix of thermodynamic factors. However, experimental data on mutual diffusion coefficients are rare, and prediction methods are satisfactory only for certain types of liquid mixtures. The thermodynamic factor may be calculated from activity coefficient models such as NRTL or UNIQUAC, which have adjustable parameters estimated from experimental phase equilibrium data. The group contribution method of UNIFAC may also be helpful, as it has a readily available parameter table consisting of mam7 species. If, however, reliable data are not available, then the averaged values of the generalized Maxwell-Stefan diffusion coefficients and the matrix of thermodynamic factors are calculated at some mean composition between x0i and xzi. Hence, the matrix of zero flux mass transfer coefficients [k ] is estimated by... [Pg.335]

The major part of the next few chapters are devoted to methods of estimating the low flux mass transfer coefficients k and [A ] and of calculating the high flux coefficients k and [/c ]. In practical applications we will need these coefficients to calculate the diffusion fluxes 7, and the all important molar fluxes N. The are needed because it is these fluxes that appear in the material balance equations for particular processes (Chapters 12-14). Thus, even if we know (or have an estimate of) the diffusion fluxes 7 we cannot immediately calculate the molar fluxes because all n of these fluxes are independent, whereas only n — 1 of the J I are independent. We need one other piece of information if we are to calculate the N. Usually, the form of this additional relationship is dictated by the context of the particular mass transfer process. The problem of determining the knowing the 7 has been called the bootstrap problem. Here, we consider its solution by considering some particular cases of practical importance. [Pg.145]

A total of 41 individual transport processes are listed in Table 4.1 as being the most significant ones of concern in this handbook. Seven in the hst are soil-side transport processes and the main focus of Part 2 of this chapter. Several of these processes including diffusion, advection, and fluid-to-solid mass transfer in porous media are also relevant to many other environmental compartments and are covered in more detail in other chapters of this book. Specifically the chapters are mass transport fundamentals from an environmental perspective (Chapter 2) molecular diffusion estimation methods (Chapter 5) advective porewater flux and chemical transport in bed-sediment (Chapter 11) diffusive chemical transport across water and sediment boundary layers (Chapter 12) bioturbation and other sorbed-phase transport processes in surface soils and sediments (Chapter 13), and dispersion and mass transfer in groundwater of the near-surface geologic formations (Chapter 15). [Pg.188]

By inspection, the flux is directly proportional to the solubility to the first power and directly proportional to the diffusion coefficient to the two-thirds power. If, for example, the proposed study involves mass transport measurements for series of compounds in which the solubility and diffusion coefficient change incrementally, then the flux is expected to follow this relationship when the viscosity and stirring rate are held constant. This model allows the investigator to simulate the flux under a variety of conditions, which may be useful in planning experiments or in estimating the impact of complexation, self-association, and other physicochemical phenomena on mass transport. [Pg.118]

In the biomedical literature (e.g. solute = enzyme, drug, etc.), values of kf and kr are often estimated from kinetic experiments that do not distinguish between diffusive transport in the external medium and chemical reaction effects. In that case, reaction kinetics are generally assumed to be rate-limiting with respect to mass transport. This assumption is typically confirmed by comparing the adsorption transient to maximum rates of diffusive flux to the cell surface. Values of kf and kr are then determined from the start of short-term experiments with either no (determination of kf) or a finite concentration (determination of kT) of initial surface bound solute [189]. If the rate constant for the reaction at the cell surface is near or equal to (cf. equation (16)), then... [Pg.475]

Mass flow and diffusion act together and cannot be separated. However an idea of their relative contributions to the net flux can be obtained by estimating the distance the solute would be transported if each process acted independently. If in time t mass flow transports the solute a distance... [Pg.21]

If external diffusion dominates the overall rate, the process obviously reduces the observed enzyme activity. The flux N through the stagnating film at the surface can be expressed as in Eq. (5.54), where 8 signifies the thickness of the stagnating layer and ks is the mass transfer coefficient of the respective solute ks can be estimated by the simple relationship of Eq. (5.55). [Pg.114]

This part of Sec. 5 provides a concise guide to solving problems in situations commonly encountered by chemical engineers. It deals with diffusivity and mass-transfer coefficient estimation and common flux equations, although material balances are also presented in typical coordinate systems to permit a wide range of problems to be formulated and solved. [Pg.45]

Since the first reports on microdialysis in living animals, there have been efforts to estimate true (absolute) extracellular concentrations of recovered substances (ZetterstrOm et al., 1983 Tossman et al., 1986). Microdialysis sampling, however, is a dynamic process, and because of a relatively high liquid flow and small membrane area, it does not lead to the complete equilibration of concentrations in the two compartments. Rather, under steady state conditions, only a fraction of any total concentration is recovered. This recovery is referred to as relative or concentration recovery, as opposed to the diffusion flux expressed as absolute or mass recovery. The dependence of recovery on the perfusion flow rate is illustrated in Figure 6.2. As seen, relative recovery will exponentially decrease with increasing flow as the samples become more... [Pg.118]

The models above may be useful for predicting mass fluxes in MD however, each of these models has its limitations. The Knudsen and Poiseuille model require knowledge of r, 8, and e, which in general can be estimated by applying the models to experimental gas fluxes through the given membrane. The molecular diffusion model is inadequate at low-partial pressures of air, as it predicts infinite flux since, in totally deaerated membrane 7 tends to zero. [Pg.523]

Figure 1. Box model for the calculation of Mn redox cycling near the sediment-water interface. Sedimentation rates are measured with sediment traps. The burial rate Sh is estimated from dated sediment cores. In situ sampling techniques (flux chambers and peepers) are used to quantify the diffusive flux across the sediment-water interface FS6. The resuspension rate R is estimated from the increase in the mass flux of settling material between the 81- and 86-m horizons. Figure 1. Box model for the calculation of Mn redox cycling near the sediment-water interface. Sedimentation rates are measured with sediment traps. The burial rate Sh is estimated from dated sediment cores. In situ sampling techniques (flux chambers and peepers) are used to quantify the diffusive flux across the sediment-water interface FS6. The resuspension rate R is estimated from the increase in the mass flux of settling material between the 81- and 86-m horizons.
Figures 16.23a to d compare experimental profiles of mixtures of the enantiomers of 1-indanol on cellulose tribenzoate with those calculated with the GMS-GRM model of these authors [57]. For the numerical calculations, they assmned that surface diffusion plays the dominant role in mass transfer across the particles and neglected the contribution of pore diffusion to the fluxes. Unfortunately, it was impossible independently to measure or even estimate the surface diffusion parameters. So, the numerical values of the surface diffusion coefficients needed for the calculation were estimated by minimizing the discrepancies between the measured and the calculated band profiles i.e., by parameter adjustment). Yet, it is impressive that, using a unique set of diffusion coefficients, it was possible to calculate band profiles of single components of binary mixtures in the whole range of relative composition, for loading factors between 0 and 10%. Figures 16.23a to d compare experimental profiles of mixtures of the enantiomers of 1-indanol on cellulose tribenzoate with those calculated with the GMS-GRM model of these authors [57]. For the numerical calculations, they assmned that surface diffusion plays the dominant role in mass transfer across the particles and neglected the contribution of pore diffusion to the fluxes. Unfortunately, it was impossible independently to measure or even estimate the surface diffusion parameters. So, the numerical values of the surface diffusion coefficients needed for the calculation were estimated by minimizing the discrepancies between the measured and the calculated band profiles i.e., by parameter adjustment). Yet, it is impressive that, using a unique set of diffusion coefficients, it was possible to calculate band profiles of single components of binary mixtures in the whole range of relative composition, for loading factors between 0 and 10%.
A different numerical strategy to simulate multiphase mixing was introduced by Mann and Mann and Hackett. The idea of the method, called the network-of-zone, is to subdivide the flow domain in a set of small cells assumed to be mixed perfectly. The cells are allowed to exchange momentum and mass with their neighboring cells by convective and diffusive fluxes. Brucato and Rizzuti and Brucato et al. applied this idea to the modeling of solid-liquid mixing. An unsteady mass balance for the particles was derived to estimate the solid distribution in the vessel, namely ... [Pg.2754]


See other pages where Diffusive flux mass diffusivity estimate is mentioned: [Pg.18]    [Pg.1988]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.6158]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.1406]    [Pg.3113]    [Pg.4674]    [Pg.5070]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.1061]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.244]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.226 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion Estimation

Diffusion diffusive flux

Diffusion mass flux

Diffusive flux

Diffusive mass flux

Diffusivity estimation

Mass diffusion

Mass diffusivities

Mass diffusivity

Mass diffusivity estimate

© 2024 chempedia.info