Diffusive boundary between different phases

Diffusive boundaries also exist between different phases. The best known example is the so-called surface renewal (or surface replacement) model of air-water exchange, an alternative to the stagnant two-film model. It will be discussed in Chapter 20.3. 

Figure 19.15 (a) Concentration profile at a diffusive boundary between two different phases. At the interface the instantaneous equilibrium between CAB and CB/A is expressed by the partition coefficient KB/A. The hatched areas show the integrated mass exchange after time t MA (t) = MB (<). (b) As before, but the size of KB/A causes a net mass flux in the opposite direction, that is from system B into system A. 

An electrode in contact with an electrolyte is called a half-cell, often also written half cell. Thus, a simple two-electrode electrochemical cell is composed of two half-cells that contain either the same electrolyte but different electrodes or different electrodes and electrolytes. The first type of chemical cell, where there is no phase boundary between different electrolytes, is a cell without transference. The other type, in which a liquid-liquid junction potential or diffusion potential is developed across the boundary between the two solutions, is a cell with transference. Commercially available reference electrodes can be considered half-cells. ... 

Although Rs values of high Ks compounds derived from Eq. 3.68 may have been partly influenced by particle sampling, it is unlikely that the equation can accurately predict the summed vapor plus particulate phase concentrations, because transport rates through the boundary layer and through the membrane are different for the vapor-phase fraction and the particle-bound fraction, due to differences in effective diffusion coefficients between molecules and small particles. In addition, it will be difficult to define universally applicable calibration curves for the sampling rate of total (particle -I- vapor) atmospheric contaminants. At this stage of development, results obtained with SPMDs for particle-associated compounds provides valuable information on source identification and temporal... 

In addition to the interphase potential difference V there exists another potential difference of fundamental importance in the theory of the electrical properties of colloids namely the electro-kinetic potential, of Freundlich. As we shall note in subsequent sections the electrokinetic potential is a calculated value based upon certain assumptions for the potential difference between the aqueous bulk phase and some apparently immobile part of the boundary layer at the interface. Thus represents a part of V but there is no method yet available for determining how far we must penetrate into the boundary layer before the potential has risen to the value of the electrokinetic potential whether in fact f represents part of, all or more than the diffuse boundary layer. It is clear from the above diagram that bears no relation to V, the former may be in fact either of the same or opposite sign, a conclusion experimentally verified by Freundlich and Rona. 

This sieve effect cannot be considered statically as a factor that only determines the amount of accessible acid groups in the resin in such a way that the boundary between the accessible and non-accessible groups would be sharp. It must be treated dynamically, i.e. the rates of the diffusion of reactants into the polymer mass must be taken into account. With the use of the Thiele s concept about the diffusion into catalyst pores, the effectiveness factors, Thiele moduli and effective diffusion coefficients can be determined from the effect of the catalyst particle size. The apparent rates of the methyl and ethyl acetate hydrolysis [490] were corrected for the effect of diffusion in the resin by the use of the effectiveness factors, the difference in ester concentration between swollen resin phase and bulk solution being taken into account. The intrinsic rate coefficients, kintly... 

Table I presents six basic equations in a general way. Those on the left apply to transfer within a phase A, and those on the right to transfer across a phase boundary AB. The top row expresses the mutual definition of force F, proportionality constant K, and potential . The second row expresses the phenomenological proportionality between flux J and force F. The bottom row states the conservation constraints. The left equation says merely that in a given volume the difference between the accumulation rate and the emanation rate must be attributed to a source S. As stated, these equations apply to any conserved quantity which is diffusing, either within a phase under the influence of a potential gradient or across a phase under the influence of a potential difference.

Indeed, it seems obvious that a variation of the concentration of any dissolving solid substance in a liquid is directly proportional to both the area of its surface contacting with the liquid and the difference between the saturation concentration (solubility) at a given temperature and the instantaneous concentration of A in B, and is inversely proportional to the volume of the liquid phase. Therefore, the general form of equation (5.1) remains unchanged for either dissolution regime of any solid in any liquid. The difference lies in the character of the dependence of the dissolution-rate constant, k, upon the thickness, 5, of the diffusion boundary layer. 

The left side of the equation represents the rate of sodium chloride removal from the boundary layer due to the difference between the transport number of Na+ ion in the membrane and that in the anolyte. The right side of the equation represents the rate of sodium chloride supply to the boundary layer caused by diffusion from the bulk phase. At a certain current density (I = Io), Co approaches zero and the following equation is established. 

The dynamics is governed by interactions between different domains of the minority phase. At late times these will have attained spherical (circular) shape for a three (two)-dimensional system. For model B systems, the classic work of Lifshitz and Slyozov [38] and the independent work by Wagner [39] form the theoretical cornerstone. The late-stage dynamics is mapped onto a diffusion equation with sources and sinks (i.e. domains) whose boundaries are time dependent. The Lifshitz-Slyozov (LS) treatment of coarsening is based on a mean field treatment of the diffusive interaction between the domains and on the assumption of an infinitely sharp interface with well defined boundary conditions. The analysis predicts the onset of dynamical scaling. As in section A3.3.3.1 we shall denote the extent of the off-criticality by > 0. The majority phase... 

Probably one of the most serious objections to the above theoretical model for the cell-impedance controlled lithium transport is the use of the conventional Pick s diffusion equation even during the phase transition, because lithium diffusion inside the electrode should be influenced by the phase boundary between two different phases. However, the contribution of the phase boundary to lithium transport is complicated and not well known. For instance, one can neither know precisely the distribution nor the shape of the growing/shrinking phase during the phase transition. 

---