Diffraction calculations, accurate

The solid curves below 7 A are calculated accurately for a model (Section 4) that fits the osmotic coefficient data. The curves above 7 A are merely schematic, showing in exaggerated form the oscillations that appear in gab at large r when the concentration is large, even for the models in Section 4. The dashed curve indicates the location and intensity of the peak in g+. (r) identified in aqueous NiCle in neutron diffraction and EXAFS studies, as reviewed in Section 5. 

Quantitative Phase Analysis. Once the identity of the components in a sample are known, it is possible to determine the quantitative composition of the sample. There are several different methods for doing a quantitative analysis, but the most rehable method is to use mixtures of known composition as standards. The computer can determine quantitatively the relative amounts of each component in the unknown sample. For accurate calculations of relative amounts in the unknown sample, it is necessary that the sample and standards have uniform distributions of crystaUites. Often the sample and standards are rotated during data collection to provide a more even distribution of crystaUites which diffract. 

The amount of high precision experimental structural data on conjugated polyenes is limited. Some structure results are presented in Table 5. In gas electron diffraction studies it is difficult to determine closely spaced bond distances accurately, because these parameters are highly correlated with the corresponding vibrational amplitudes. Today it is possible to calculate the vibrational amplitudes accurately, if the vibrational frequencies are known. This was, however, not the case when the GED studies presented in Table 5 were carried out. The observed differences between the terminal and central C=C bonds in the GED studies of traw.s-l,3,5-hexatriene and c/s-l,3,5-hexatricne are probably too large29. A very accurate X-ray study of traw.s-l,3,5-hexatriene has, however, been carried out also in connection with the preparation of this chapter4. Figure 4 shows the molecular structures of trans-1,3-butadiene and trans-l,3,5-hexatriene as found in the crystal lattice. 

X-ray diffraction allows the dimensions of the unit cell to be accurately measured. If the structure type of the material is known, the ideal cell contents are also known. Thus, the unit cell of a crystal of composition M2O3 that adopts the corundum structure contains 12 M atoms and 18 O atoms (Supplementary Material, SI). This readily allows the theoretical density of a solid to be calculated. The weights of all of the atoms in the cell are added, and this is divided by the cell volume. 

The accurate spatial location of these atoms generally needs a sophisticated approach, for example, the study of a complete deuterated set of isotopic derivatives in microwave spectroscopy or the use of neutron diffraction techniques. We shall see below that a set of CNDO/2 calculations combined with suitable experiments (microwave spectroscopy and/or electron diffraction) may help to solve the geometrical and conformational analysis of compounds containing many hydrogen atoms. 

Gas-phase electron diffraction is the technique of choice for many special problems of molecular structure determination. However, it has not become a mass-producing technique like X-ray crystallography or the quantum chemical calculations. With the proliferation of quantum chemical calculations some of the problems, namely, the accurate determination of relatively simple organic molecules that used to be solved by gas-phase electron diffraction have moved to the realm of these calculations. There are a wealth of other problems, mainly in inorganic chemistry, that still necessitate the application of this rather demanding but instructive and amazing approach. 

Structure determination from X-ray and neutron diffraction data is a standard procedure. Starting with a rough model, the accurate structure is determined using a least-squares structure refinement, which is based on kinematic diffraction and in which the differences between calculated and experimental intensities are minimized. X-ray and neutron diffraction are not applicable to all crystals. To determine crystal structures of thin layers on a substrate or small precipitates in a matrix (see figure 1) only electron diffraction (ED) can lead you to the crystal structure. 

The eomparison of our results (a = 16.70 A, b = 16.92(1) A, c = 5.22 A, a-P=90°, y=119.7°) with the former cell determination of Rius and a recent one refined by him from synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction (a = b = 16.8820(9) A, c = 5.2251(3) A, a=P=90°, y=120°) [7] is quite satisfying. Due to the spike function and some possible misalignment the uncertainty in tilt angle determination is at least 0.5°. Therefore, electron diffraction data will never be as accurate as x-ray powder data. Assuming a correct alignment of the eucentric height we still find an inaccuracy of minimum 0.2 A for direct measured values and of at least 0.5 A for calculated cell distances. 

Rietveld refinement [25, 26] is a method of whole pattern refinement, where a calculated diffraction pattern for a structure model is a least-squares fit to an observed diffraction pattern. Originally, it was used as a means of verifying proposed structure models. For zeolites, Rietveld refinement is still used for the same purpose and provides details of the structure including atomic positions of framework atoms and cation sittings. Data with accurate intensities and well-resolved peaks are needed for the most accurate work, and so often a synchrotron source is used for data collection since it can provide higher intensity and peak resolution than an in-house diffractometer. However, modern in-house diffractometers often provide good enough data for some refinements. 

In the case of ITPP, Ferro and BrCickner (28) showed that unrestrained minimization of the total energy for a microcrystal corresponding to unstretched fibers yields a structure in very close agreement to the crystallographically refined one. This was in contrast to the earlier results with less accurate calculations. Furthermore, their calculations, which used slightly modified MM2 potentials and a modest restraint on the cartesian coordinates, provided a stereochemically acceptable model that reproduces the powder diffraction profile as accurately as the least-squares fitted model. 

---