Differential Tube model-based

High-pressure fluid flows into the low-pressure shell (or tube chaimel if the low-pressure fluid is on the tubeside). The low-pressure volume is represented by differential equations that determine the accumulation of high-pressure fluid within the shell or tube channel. The model determines the pressure inside the shell (or tube channel) based on the accumulation of high-pressure fluid and remaining low pressure fluid. The surrounding low-pressure system model simulates the flow/pressure relationship in the same manner used in water hammer analysis. Low-pressure fluid accumulation, fluid compressibility and pipe expansion are represented by pipe segment symbols. If a relief valve is present, the model must include the spring force and the disk mass inertia. 

The model was also applied to the study of low-solubility drugs. Numerical results of the system of differential equations reported in [55] were compared to the simulations based on the heterogeneous tube. In the simulations the z variable is computed using the mean transit time of the particles, (TSi) = 24, 500 MCS, and z = tj (Tsi), expressing both t and (TSi) in MCS. The tablet was... 

The choice of experimental reactor is important to the success of the kinetic modeling effort. The short bench-scale reaction tubes sometimes used for studies of this sort give little or no insight into best mathematical form of the kinetic model, conduct the reaction over varying temperatures and partial pressures along the tube, and inevitably operate at velocities that are a small fraction of those to be encountered in the plant-scale reactor. Rate models from laboratory reactors of this sort rarely scale-up well. The laboratory differential reactor suffers from velocity problems but does at least conduct the reaction at known and relatively constant temperature and partial pressures. However, one usually runs into accuracy problems because calculated reaction rates are based upon the small observed differences in concentration between the reactor inlet and outlet. 

They subsequently (2) developed a one-dimensional mathematical model in the form of coupled differential and integro-differential equations, based on a gross mechanism for the chemical kinetics and on thermal feedback by wall-to-wall radiation, conduction in the tube wall, and convection between the gas stream and the wall. This model yielded results by numerical integration which were in good agreement with the experimental measurements for the 9.53-mm tube. For this tube diameter, the flows of unbumed gas for stable flames were in the turbulent regime. 

The tubular reactor is so named because the physical configuration of the reactor is normally such that the reaction takes place within a tube or length of pipe. The idealized model of this type of reactor is based on the assumption that an entering fluid element moves through the reactor as a differentially thin plug of material that fills the reactor cross section completely. Thus, the terms piston flow or plug flow reactor (PFR) are often employed to describe the idealized model. The contents of a specific differential plug are presumed to be uniform in temperature and composition. This model may be used to treat both the case where the tube is packed with a solid catalyst (see Section 12.1) and the case where the fluid phase alone is present. 

Since the model is based on mechanistic rate relationships, the composition profiles (as well as temperature and pressure) are calculated at positions from the inlet of the catalyst tube to the outlet. The differential reaction rate relationships, as well as the mass balances, heat balances, and pressure drop relationships are solved simultaneously. A global spline collocation algorithm is used to pose the problem, and an SQP algorithm (sequential quadratic programming) solves the relationships. 

A fired-tube furnace is one of the case studies in the Process Control Modules (PCM) in Appendix E. The PCM furnace model is a nonlinear state-space model that consists of 26 nonlinear ordinary differential equations based on conservation equations and reaction rate expressions for combustion (Doyle et al., 1998). The key process variables for the furnace model are listed in Table 13.1. 

---