Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Differential exact , tests

One of the more powerful techniques is a new software tool called mass defect filtering.176 185-188 A mass defect can be defined as the difference between the exact mass and nominal mass of a compound.189 Typically, drug-like molecules (and their metabolites) will have mass defects that differ from those of endogenous matrix materials. While a mass spectrometer that has unit mass resolution cannot differentiate a test compound from an isobaric matrix compound, a high mass resolution MS may be able to differentiate many isobaric matrix compounds from test compounds. [Pg.223]

From the definition of a partial molar quantity and some thermodynamic substitutions involving exact differentials, it is possible to derive the simple, yet powerful, Duhem data testing relation (2,3,18). Stated in words, the Duhem equation is a mole-fraction-weighted summation of the partial derivatives of a set of partial molar quantities, with respect to the composition of one of the components (2,3). For example, in an / -component system, there are n partial molar quantities, Af, representing any extensive molar property. At a specified temperature and pressure, only n — 1) of these properties are independent. Many experiments, however, measure quantities for every chemical in a multicomponent system. It is this redundance in reported data that makes thermodynamic consistency tests possible. [Pg.236]

In equation (1.4), the infinitesimal change dZ is an exact differential. Later, we will describe the mathematical test and condition to determine if a differential is exact. [Pg.9]

If one causes an infinitismal change dZ to occur, the quantity dZ is an exact differential (whenever Z is a state function). We will now describe the test that determines if a differential is exact and summarize the relationship between exact differentials. [Pg.22]

The differential bZ (or dZ) can be tested for exactness by applying the Maxwell Relation given by equation (1.28) ... [Pg.23]

Example 1.1 Test the following differential expressions to determine which is an exact differential... [Pg.23]

It is not convenient to test for exactness by showing that equation (Al.17) is true for all closed paths, but an easier test can be developed. Consider a general differential expression, 6Q, for a quantity Q that is associated with the variables X and Y ... [Pg.604]

It is this last characteristic that is used most frequently in testing thermodynamic functions for exactness. If the differential li/ of a thermodynamic quantity J is exact, then J is called a thermodynamic property or a state function. [Pg.17]

Reciprocity Characteristic. A common test of exactness of a differential expression dL(x, y, dx, dy) is whether the following relationship holds ... [Pg.17]

Procedure Transfer 2.00 mL of each sample to separate test tubes, and equilibrate in the 37° water bath for at least 10 min. At the same time, equilibrate the Substrate Solution in the same water bath. At zero time, transfer 2.0 mL of the equilibrated Substrate Solution to the first sample tube, mix thoroughly, and return the tube to the 37° bath. Repeat the process for each sample. After exactly 30.0 min, transfer the test tube to a boiling water bath for 15 min, then remove and cool to room temperature. Add approximately 100 mg of Amberlite MB-1 Ion Exchange Resin to each tube, place the tubes on the shaker, and mix for at least 15 min. Filter the treated solution through a 0.45-p.m filter. Use a separate filter for each sample. Inject a 5-p.L portion of each filtered sample into a previously equilibrated high-performance liquid chromatograph equipped with an HPX 87C column (Biorad, or equivalent) and a differential refractometer. Filtered, degassed water is the mobile phase. Record the elution curve. [Pg.917]

Ammonium molybdate solution from a solution of potassium hexacyano-ferrate(II), acidified with dilute hydrochloric acid, a brown precipitate of molybdenyl hexacyanoferrate(II) is formed. The exact composition of the precipitate is not known. The precipitate is insoluble in dilute acids, but soluble in solutions of alkali hydroxides. The test can be applied to differentiate hexacyanoferrate(II) ions from hexacyanoferrate(III) and thiocyanate, which do not react. [Pg.321]

The method used for the solution of case 3 was tested on systems for which the differential equation could be set up. The approximate solution was within 0.1% of the exact solution in each case. [Pg.728]

The differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis can sometimes be challenging. Laboratory testing can help both to identify the etiology and to effectively direct treatment. Ideally, in all cases of infectious conjimctivitis, cultures or ocular smears should be obtained to determine the exact etiology. However, in practice this rarely is done. Experienced practitioners typically treat infectious conjimctivitis empirically. In most cases eye care providers can diagnose conjunctivitis accurately and treat it effectively... [Pg.440]

The key elements of the MWR are the expansion functions (also called the trail-, basis- or approximating functions) and the weight functions (also known as test functions). The trial functions are used as the basis functions for a truncated series expansion of the solution, which, when substituted into the differential equation, produces the residual. The test functions are used to ensure that the differential equation is satisfied as closely as possible by the truncated series expansion. This is achieved by minimizing the residual, i.e., the error in the differential equation produced by using the truncated expansion instead of the exact solution, with respect to a suitable norm. An equivalent requirement is that the residual satisfy a suitable orthogonality condition with respect to each of the test functions. [Pg.996]

The choice of test function distinguishes between the most commonly used spectral schemes, the Galerkin, tan, collocation, and least squares versions [22, 51, 84, 89] (see also [60, 132, 54, 17]). In the Galerkin approach, the test functions are the same as the trail functions, whereas in the collocation approach the test functions are translated Dirac delta functions centered at special, so-called collocation points. The collocation approach thus requires that the differential equation is satisfied exactly at the collocation points. Spectral tau methods are close to Galerkin methods, but they differ in the treatment of boundary conditions. [Pg.996]

Testing of the temperature dependence of the extension and shrinkage behaviour at low (TMA) or oscillating (DMA) yarn tension glass temperature, elasticity and other parameters for exact differentiation of elastomeric fibres. [Pg.213]

A test for exact differentials (order of differentiation unimportant) shows that ... [Pg.479]

In such a complex field it is well for the clinical chemist to try to achieve a clear idea of exactly how his laboratory tests can contribute to the activities of his clinical colleagues. It is fair to observe that in most problems of differential diagnosis in this field steroid measurements provide strong corroborative evidence for a decision rather than conclusive and critical evidence. The latter can usually be obtained only if the measurements are part of a sophisticated and lengthy investigation. However, such corroborative evidence is of more than trivial value in... [Pg.76]

Methods for solving mass and heat transfer problems. The convective diffusion equation (3.1.1) is a second-order linear partial differential equation with variable coefficients (in the general case, the fluid velocity depends on the coordinates and time). Exact closed-form solutions of the corresponding problems can be found only in exceptional cases with simple geometry [79,197, 270, 370, 516]. This is especially true of the nonlinear equation (3.1.17). Exact solutions are important for adequate understanding of the physical background of various phenomena and processes. They can serve as test solutions to verify whether the problem is well-posed or to estimate the accuracy of the corresponding numerical, asymptotic, and approximate methods. [Pg.116]

The testing of SAS according to the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) test number 7601, for example, can never serve as an exact procedure for the differentiation of crystalline or amorphous silica. The test may be useful (to a certain extent) for determining the content of respirable or total dust in airborne samples in order to ascertain the approximate degree of risk for the human lung. [Pg.484]


See other pages where Differential exact , tests is mentioned: [Pg.320]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.43]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



Exact

Exactive

Exactness

© 2024 chempedia.info