Differential equations formulation

The non-aqueous system of spherical micelles of poly(styrene)(PS)-poly-(isoprene)(PI) in decane has been investigated by Farago et al. and Kanaya et al. [298,299]. The data were interpreted in terms of corona brush fluctuations that are described by a differential equation formulated by de Gennes for the breathing mode of tethered polymer chains on a surface [300]. A fair description of S(Q,t) with a minimum number of parameters could be achieved. Kanaya et al. [299] extended the investigation to a concentrated (30%, PI volume fraction) PS-PI micelle system and found a significant slowing down of the relaxation. The latter is explained by a reduction of osmotic compressibihty in the corona due to chain overlap. 

Discuss the relationship between the continuity equation (Eq. 7.44) and Eq. 7.60 that represents the relationship between the physical radial coordinate and the stream function. Note that one is a partial differential equation and that the other is an ordinary differential equation. Formulate a finite-difference representation of the continuity equation in the primative form. Be sure to respect the order of the equation in the discrete representation. 

M. Fujii, M. Tahara, I. Sakagami, W. Freude, and P. Russer, High-order FDTD and auxiliary differential equation formulation of optical pulse propagation in 2-D Kerr and Raman nonlinear dispersive media, IEEEJ. Quantum Electron., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 175-182, Feb. 2004.doi 10.1109/JQE.2003.821881... 

A comparison of the formulas (5.91) and (5.79) might lead one to conclude that use of the Lie differential equation formalism has enabled us to eliminate the uncertainty associated with the choice of the threshold value T for the self-similarity scale. This is not so. The self-similarity threshold, like the period of a periodic function, is an inherent feature of each physical object expected to exhibit self-similarity. By adopting the differential equation formulation of the GPRG theory one implicitly has selected a threshold scale equal to unity, that is, t = 1. 

The finite difference technique replaces the differential operators in the partial differential equation formulations with difference operators. For porous media flow studies, this is almost never done, except possibly in situations where the properties are constant. As there exists no variational principle for the full two-phase flow equations, the finite element method must be used... 

This discussion suggests that even the reference trajectories used by symplectic integrators such as Verlet may not be sufficiently accurate in this more rigorous sense. They are quite reasonable, however, if one requires, for example, that trajectories capture the spectral densities associated with the fastest motions in accord to the governing model [13, 15]. Furthermore, other approaches, including nonsymplectic integrators and trajectories based on stochastic differential equations, can also be suitable in this case when carefully formulated. 

We further discuss how quantities typically measured in the experiment (such as a rate constant) can be computed with the new formalism. The computations are based on stochastic path integral formulation [6]. Two different sources for stochasticity are considered. The first (A) is randomness that is part of the mathematical modeling and is built into the differential equations of motion (e.g. the Langevin equation, or Brownian dynamics). The second (B) is the uncertainty in the approximate numerical solution of the exact equations of motion. 

Another difference is related to the mathematical formulation. Equation (1) is deterministic and does not include explicit stochasticity. In contrast, the equations of motion for a Brownian particle include noise. Nevertheless, similar algorithms are adopted to solve the two differential equations as outlined below. The most common approach is to numerically integrate the above differential equations using small time steps and preset initial values. 

In unsteady states the situation is less satisfactory, since stoichiometric constraints need no longer be satisfied by the flux vectors. Consequently differential equations representing material balances can be constructed only for binary mixtures, where the flux relations can be solved explicitly for the flux vectors. This severely limits the scope of work on the dynamical equations and their principal field of applicacion--Che theory of stability of steady states. The formulation of unsteady material and enthalpy balances is discussed in Chapter 12, which also includes a brief digression on stability problems. 

The Poisson equation has been used for both molecular mechanics and quantum mechanical descriptions of solvation. It can be solved directly using numerical differential equation methods, such as the finite element or finite difference methods, but these calculations can be CPU-intensive. A more efficient quantum mechanical formulation is referred to as a self-consistent reaction field calculation (SCRF) as described below. 

The most useful mathematical formulation of a fluid flow problem is as a boundary value problem. This consists of two main parts a set of differential equations to be satisfied within a region of interest and a set of boundary conditions to be satisfied on the surfaces of that region. Sometimes additional conditions are also of interest, eg, when one is investigating the stability of a flow. 

The formulation step may result in algebraic equations, difference equations, differential equations, integr equations, or combinations of these. In any event these mathematical models usually arise from statements of physical laws such as the laws of mass and energy conservation in the form. 

These equations will have to he solved numerically for A, B, and C as functions of time then D and E can he found hy algehra. Alternatively, five differential equations can he written and solved directly for the five participants as functions of time, thus avoiding the use of stoichiometric balances, although these are really involved in the formulation of the differential equations. 

How a differential equation is formulated for some lands of ideal reactors is described briefly in Sec. 7 of this Handbook and at greater length with many examples in Walas Modeling with Differential Equations in Chemical Engineering, Butterworth-Heineman, 1991). 

Equation (7) is a second-order differential equation. A more general formulation of Newton s equation of motion is given in terms of the system s Hamiltonian, FI [Eq. (1)]. Put in these terms, the classical equation of motion is written as a pair of coupled first-order differential equations ... 

These coupled second-order partial differential equations do not have a closed-form solution. Accordingly, the approximate numerical technique of finite differences is employed. First, however, the boundary conditions must be prescribed in order to complete the formulation of the problem. Symmetry of the laminate about several planes permits reduction of the region of consideration to a quarter of the laminate cross section in the y-z plane at any value of x as shown in Figure 4-52. There, along the stress-free upper surface. 

Systems of reversible first-order reactions lead to sets of simultaneous linear differential equations with constant coefficients. A solution may be obtained by means of a matrix formulation that is widely used in quantum mechanics and vibrational... 

The literature of science is replete with models. This variety enables one to make some interesting observations. Thus, for example, one rarely regards models as unique or absolute, although, through the choice of a specific one (e.g., a differential equation), unique solutions to problems may be obtained. A model is formulated to serve a specific purpose. Some models may be suitable for generalization, others may not be. These generalizations are more profitably made as extrapolations for scientific purposes, and occasionally as useful philosophical observations. A model must be flexible to absorb new information, and, hence, stochastic processes have broader and richer applicability than deterministic models. 

In the case when the differential equation contains t explicitly, the formulation of Liapounov s theorems is slightly different, namely ... 

Within each solution surface are numerous subsets of points that also satisfy the differential equation bQ = dF = 0. These subsets are referred to as solution curves of the Pfaffian. The curve z — 0, y + y2 = 25.00 is one of the solution curves for our particular solution surface with radius = 5.00. Others would include x = 0, y2 + z2 — 25.00, and r — 0,. v2 + r2 = 25.00. Solution curves on the same solution surface can intersect. For example, our first two solution curves intersect at two points (5, 0, 0) and (-5, 0. 0). However, solution curves on one surface cannot be solution curves for another surface since the surfaces do not intersect. That two solution surfaces to an exact Pfaffian differential equation cannot intersect and that solution curves for one surface cannot be solution curves for another have important consequences as we see in our discussion of the Caratheodory formulation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 

Finite element formulations for linear stress analysis problems are often derived by direct reasoning approaches. Fluid flow and other materials processing problems, however, are often viewed more easily in terms of their governing differential equations, and this is the... 

A rigorous definition of stability of a difference scheme will be formulated in the next section. The improvement of the approximation order for a difference scheme on a solution of a differential equation will be of great importance since the scientists wish the order to be as high as possible. 

The basic notions of the theory of difference schemes are the error of approximation, stability, convergence, and accuracy of difference scheme. A more detailed exposition of these eoncepts will appear in Chapter 2. They are illustrated by considering a number of difference schemes for ordinary differential equations. In the same chapter we also outline the approach to the general formulations without regard to the particular form of the difference operator. 

Catalytic reactions (as well as the related class of chain reactions described below) are coupled reactions, and their kinetic description requires methods to solve the associated set of differential equations that describe the constituent steps. This stimulated Chapman in 1913 to formulate the steady state approximation which, as we will see, plays a central role in solving kinetic schemes. 

For a solution of differential equations (18.12) and (18.15) and for a quantitative calculation of the current distribution, we must know how the current density depends on polarization at constant reactant concentrations or on reactant concentrations at constant polarization. We must also formulate the boundary conditions. Examples of such calculations are reported below. 

The differential equations are often highly non-linear and the equation variables are often highly interrelated. In the above formulation, yj represents any one of the dependent system variables and, fi is the general function relationship, relating the derivative, dyi/dt, with the other related dependent variables. Tbe system independent variable, t, will usually correspond to time, but may also represent distance, for example, in the simulation of steady-state models of tubular and column devices. 

The main process variables in differential contacting devices vary continuously with respect to distance. Dynamic simulations therefore involve variations with respect to both time and position. Thus two independent variables, time and position, are now involved. Although the basic principles remain the same, the mathematical formulation, for the dynamic system, now results in the form of partial differential equations. As most digital simulation languages permit the use of only one independent variable, the second independent variable, either time or distance is normally eliminated by the use of a finite-differencing procedure. In this chapter, the approach is based very largely on that of Franks (1967), and the distance coordinate is treated by finite differencing. 

---