Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Differences between J and

At a diffusion coefficient of high-molecular organic vapors which is smaller than the diffusion coefficient of oxygen, conditions in the pellet will be more favorable than in a flame front moving with respect to the gas. We saw that the incompleteness of the combustion and the difference between (J.) and (f) are related to this. [Pg.296]

Figure 10 Examples of the analysis of long-range cross peaks in (A) isotropic and (B) aligned sample of Me-/ -D-xylopyranoside. Short-dashed and solids lines show anti-phase (AP) and in-phase (IP) multiplets. Long-dashed singlets were obtained by the addition and subtraction of the IP and AP multiplets using appropriate scaling factors. (C) Overlay of two one-bond cross peaks from isotropic (solid line) and aligned (dashed line) samples. The multiplets were shifted to overlay on one line of the doublet in order to accentuate the difference between J and D. Figure 10 Examples of the analysis of long-range cross peaks in (A) isotropic and (B) aligned sample of Me-/ -D-xylopyranoside. Short-dashed and solids lines show anti-phase (AP) and in-phase (IP) multiplets. Long-dashed singlets were obtained by the addition and subtraction of the IP and AP multiplets using appropriate scaling factors. (C) Overlay of two one-bond cross peaks from isotropic (solid line) and aligned (dashed line) samples. The multiplets were shifted to overlay on one line of the doublet in order to accentuate the difference between J and D.
Unlike (dHldp)j, (dUldV)j, does indeed vanish for real gases as the pressure goes to zero, but this is because the derivative is with respect to V, not because of the difference between U and H. At appreciable pressures (dT/dV)jjis almost invariably negative, because the Joule temperature, at which dfi/dThecomes negative, is extremely high (see figure A2.1.7). [Pg.358]

Isotherm Models for Adsorption of Mixtures. Of the following models, all but the ideal adsorbed solution theory (lAST) and the related heterogeneous ideal adsorbed solution theory (HIAST) have been shown to contain some thermodynamic inconsistencies. References to the limited available Hterature data on the adsorption of gas mixtures on activated carbons and 2eohtes have been compiled, along with a brief summary of approximate percentage differences between data and theory for the various theoretical models (16). In the following the subscripts i and j refer to different adsorbates. [Pg.274]

As is to be expected, inherent disorder has an effect on electronic and optical properties of amorphous semiconductors providing for distinct differences between them and the crystalline semiconductors. The inherent disorder provides for localized as well as nonlocalized states within the same band such that a critical energy, can be defined by distinguishing the two types of states (4). At E = E, the mean free path of the electron is on the order of the interatomic distance and the wave function fluctuates randomly such that the quantum number, k, is no longer vaHd. For E < E the wave functions are localized and for E > E they are nonlocalized. For E > E the motion of the electron is diffusive and the extended state mobiHty is approximately 10 cm /sV. For U <, conduction takes place by hopping from one localized site to the next. Hence, at U =, )J. goes through a... [Pg.357]

One manner in which size may be computed, for estimating purposes, is by employing a volumetric heat-transfer concept as used for rotary diyers. It it is assumed that contacting efficiency is in the same order as that provided by efficient lifters in a rotaiy dryer and that the velocity difference between gas and solids controls, Eq. (12-52) may be employed to estimate a volumetric heat-transfer coefficient. By assuming a duct diameter of 0.3 m (D) and a gas velocity of 23 m/s, if the solids velocity is taken as 80 percent of this speed, the velocity difference between the two would be 4.6 m/s. If the exit gas has a density of 1 kg/m, the relative mass flow rate of the gas G becomes 4.8 kg/(s m the volumetric heat-transfer coefficient is 2235 J/(m s K). This is not far different from many coefficients found in commercial installations however, it is usually not possible to predict accurately the acdual difference in velocity between gas and soRds. Furthermore, the coefficient is influenced by the sohds-to-gas loading and particle size, which control the total solids surface exposed to the gas. Therefore, the figure given is only an approximation. [Pg.1228]

Relative width of region of unreliable reaction (5) was estimated as the ratio of difference between maximum and minimal concentrations to minimal concentration in this region. The test-system containing Co [Fe(CN)g] is the most resistant to uncontrolled factors, the lowest detection limit characterizes a film with Ni,[Fe(CN)J. The possibility of test-films application for quantitative determination of nitroxoline is testified. [Pg.325]

We saw in Problem 4.20 that ds-decalin is less stable than (nms-decalin. Assume that the 1,3-diaxial interactions in tm/zs-decalin are similar to those in axial methv cvc ohexane ithat is, one CH-><—>H interaction costs 3.8 kj/moi (0.9 kcal/mol)J, and calculate the magnitude of the energy difference between ris- and fraus-decalin. [Pg.135]

Producing burn-out correlations would appear to be almost a pastime Milioti (Ml2), for example, was able to compile a total of 59 different burnout correlations, and the number still grows. Most of these correlations are based on very restricted ranges of system parameters, however, and although they work well within the restrictions, they usually deviate markedly on extrapolation. Some of the earlier correlations are also readily seen to be inconsistent with now well-established experimental facts, even simple though important facts such as the linear or nearly linear relationship between and Ah. As mentioned earlier, the hypothesis-testing technique exploited by Barnett is a very effective tool for showing up defects, and the method has... [Pg.249]

Kluk was the first to obtain these results [269]. They differ drastically from (6.25). When the medium becomes more rarefied, intensity in the central part of the IR spectrum decreases to zero. Hence, tJ j shortens, unlike t, which lengthens. The time t e i behaves in the same manner for the case of weak collisions, though a formula quantitatively analogous to (6.63) is not found for this case. One can refer only to numerical calculations based on the general formulae by Sack or by Fixman and Rider. These calculations provide identical results [85]. Fig. 6.5 shows that, in rarefied media, the difference between weak and strong collision... [Pg.214]

The effect of viscous dissipation on temperature change along the micro-channel axis is illustrated in Fig. 4.11, where the dependences dT),/ dx on d that correspond to water and isopropanol flows are presented. One can see that under the conditions corresponding to the Judy et al. (2002) experiments = 74.1 pm, L = 114 mm, Ljd = 1,543), the rise of bulk temperature due to viscous dissipation is small enough. So, at d > 100 pm the temperature gradient is dT),/ dx < 1 K/m. In this case, the difference between outlet and inlet temperature is about 0.1 K. Under conditions that are typical for micro-channels of electronic devices L/d r j 102) this difference is about 0.01 K. The rise of temperature due to viscous dissipation is small enough even at water flow in micro-channels with d 20 pm. Thus, for micro-channels with d = 20 pm and L/d = 10, we have Tout — Tin 0.8 K. [Pg.164]

TABLE 4.3 Free-Enei Differences between Equatorial and Axial Substituents on j Cyclohexane Ring (A Values)... [Pg.174]

Power C, McArthur JC, Nath A et al (1998) Neuronal death induced by brain-derived human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope genes differs between demented and nondemented AIDS patients. J Virol 72 9045-9053... [Pg.170]

SU L C, BUI M, KARDINAAL A, GCMEZ-ARACENA J, MARTIN-MORENO J, MARTIN B, THAMM M, SIMONSEN N, van t veer p, kck f, STRAIN s and KOHLMEiER L (1998) Differences between plasma and adipose tissue biomarkers of carotenoids and tocopherols. Cancer Epidemiol Biobarkers Prev 7(11) 1043-8. [Pg.126]

Oprea, T. I., Davis, A. M., Teague, S. J., Leeson, P. D. Is there a difference between leads and drugs A historical perspective. [Pg.458]

Yeadon, M. and Payne, A.N. (1989). Ozone-induced bronchial hyperreactivity to histamine and ovalbumin in sensitised guinea-p differences between intravenous and aerosol challenge. Eur. Resp. J. 2, 2995. [Pg.231]


See other pages where Differences between J and is mentioned: [Pg.168]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.2964]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.1470]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.474]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.345 ]




SEARCH



Differences between

© 2024 chempedia.info