Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dielectric-experimental parameters

The magnitude of the dissociation constant A plays an important role in the response characteristics of the sensor. For a weakly dissociated gas (e.g., CO2, K = 4.4 x 10-7), the sensor can reach its equilibrium value in less than 100 s and no accumulation of CO2 takes place in the interior layer. On the other hand, SO2, which is a much stronger acid (K = 1.3 x 10-2), accumulates inside the sensor and its rep-sonse time is in minutes. The detection limit and sensitivity of the conductometric gas sensors also depend on the value of the dissociation constant, on the solubility of the gas in the internal filling solution, and, to some extent, on the equivalent ionic conductances of the ions involved. Although an aqueous filling solution has been used in all conductometric gas sensors described to date, it is possible, in principle, to use any liquid for that purpose. The choice of the dielectric constant and solubility would then provide additional experimental parameters that could be optimized in order to obtain higher selectivity and/or a lower detection limit. [Pg.260]

The dielectric constant is the only experimental parameter that can here be used, as it is the only property that has N = 63. Comparison between Tables 7.8 and 7.10 shows the noticeable improvement achieved by the full combinatorial method over the greedy method, especially at the Y level. The correlation vector of descriptor (Table 7.9) used to model this property and to obtain Fig. 7.2 is ... [Pg.132]

The solvent dielectric constant, ionic strength and temperature are chosen to fit the conditions of the experimental studies. The protein dielectric constant is assigned some small value, e.g. 4. The PB calculations are currently carried out with the atomic charges and radii of the PARSE parameter set, developed by Honig and coworkers [17] or that for CHARMM [12]. The PARSE parameter set... [Pg.182]

Polarization which can be induced in nonconducting materials by means of an externally appHed electric field is one of the most important parameters in the theory of insulators, which are called dielectrics when their polarizabiUty is under consideration (1). Experimental investigations have shown that these materials can be divided into linear and nonlinear dielectrics in accordance with their behavior in a realizable range of the electric field. The electric polarization PI of linear dielectrics depends linearly on the electric field E, whereas that of nonlinear dielectrics is a nonlinear function of the electric field (2). The polarization values which can be measured in linear (normal) dielectrics upon appHcation of experimentally attainable electric fields are usually small. However, a certain group of nonlinear dielectrics exhibit polarization values which are several orders of magnitude larger than those observed in normal dielectrics (3). Consequentiy, a number of useful physical properties related to the polarization of the materials, such as elastic, thermal, optical, electromechanical, etc, are observed in these groups of nonlinear dielectrics (4). [Pg.202]

Various data sources (44) on plasma parameters can be used to calculate conditions for plasma excitation and resulting properties for microwave coupling. Interactions ia a d-c magnetic field are more compHcated and offer a rich array of means for microwave power transfer (45). The Hterature offers many data sources for dielectric or magnetic permittivities or permeabiHty of materials (30,31,46). Because these properties vary considerably with frequency and temperature, available experimental data are iasufficient to satisfy all proposed appHcations. In these cases, available theories can be appHed or the dielectric parameters can be determined experimentally (47). [Pg.340]

Solvent effects on chemical equilibria and reactions have been an important issue in physical organic chemistry. Several empirical relationships have been proposed to characterize systematically the various types of properties in protic and aprotic solvents. One of the simplest models is the continuum reaction field characterized by the dielectric constant, e, of the solvent, which is still widely used. Taft and coworkers [30] presented more sophisticated solvent parameters that can take solute-solvent hydrogen bonding and polarity into account. Although this parameter has been successfully applied to rationalize experimentally observed solvent effects, it seems still far from satisfactory to interpret solvent effects on the basis of microscopic infomation of the solute-solvent interaction and solvation free energy. [Pg.432]

The global rate of the process is r = rj + r2. Of all the authors who studied the whole reaction only Fang et al.15 took into account the changes in dielectric constant and in viscosity and the contribution of hydrolysis. Flory s results fit very well with the relation obtained by integration of the rate equation. However, this relation contains parameters of which apparently only 3 are determined experimentally independent of the kinetic study. The other parameters are adjusted in order to obtain a straight line. Such a method obviously makes the linearization easier. [Pg.81]

In order to go further into the experimental check we constructed Arrhenius plots of the fluorescence quantum yield of BMPC in a few solvents (methanol, ethanol, propanol, hexanol and methylene chloride), all of which showed good linearity. The activation energies and A/kp ratios, calculated from the slopes and intercepts of those plots, are collected in Table 1. The smooth increase of both parameters in the alcohol series is mainly associated with the increase of solvent viscosity. On the other hand, decrease of the solvent dielectric constant from 32.7 (methanol) to 8.9 (dichloromethane) causes a small but significant increase of the activation energy also, this increase is probably somewhat compensated by the decrease of the viscous-flow... [Pg.393]

We outline experimental results and provide theoretical interpretation of effect of adsorption of molecular oxygen and alkyl radicals in condensed media (water, proton-donor and aproton solvents) having different values of dielectric constant on electric conductivity of sensors. We have established that above parameter substantially affects the reversible changes of electric conductivity of a sensor in above media which are rigorously dependent on concentration of dissolved oxygen. [Pg.3]

The most important model parameter in PBFE and MM/PBSA is the dielectric constant used for the solutes. Most studies have taken an empirical approach, viewing the dielectric constant as an adjustable parameter. While this seems plausible, it is prudent to analyze the physical problem in more detail, because, in some cases, the experimental data can be fit by models that are distinctly unphysical, despite some plausible features. We therefore come back to the simplest possible PBFE calculation the important problem of proton binding, or pKa shifts. We discuss a nonem-pirical model that attempts to avoid parameter fitting and that gives insights into the limitations of simplified continuum electrostatic free energy methods. [Pg.452]

A larger protein dielectric constant of four was used by Eberini et al. [124] to fit the experimental pKa, in a case where the protein structural relaxation upon protonation was especially large. The need for a larger protein dielectric suggests a breakdown of the linear response assumption for this system. It may be preferable in such a case to simulate an additional point along the reaction pathway, such as the midpoint, rather than shifting to what is effectively a parameter-fitting approach. [Pg.453]

In all liquids, the free-ion yield increases with the external electric field E. An important feature of the Onsager (1938) theory is that the slope-to-intercept ratio (S/I) of the linear increase of free-ion yield with the field at small values of E is given by e3/2efeB2T2, where is the dielectric constant of the medium, T is its absolute temperature, and e is the magnitude of electronic charge. Remarkably S/I is independent of the electron thermalization distance distribution or other features of electron dynamics in fact, it is free of adjustable parameters. The theoretical value of S/I can be calculated accurately with a known value of the dielectric constant it has been well verified experimentally in a number of liquids, some at different temperatures (Hummel and Allen, 1967 Dodelet et al, 1972 Terlecki and Fiutak, 1972). [Pg.305]


See other pages where Dielectric-experimental parameters is mentioned: [Pg.272]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.826]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.862]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.175]   


SEARCH



Dielectric parameters

Experimental parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info