Skeleton diagram

Up to this point, we have used a numerical input file to stress the fact that computers work on numbers, not diagrams, MM3 and TINKER work from numerical input files that are similar but not identical. Both can be adapted to wo rk u n de r th e c om m an d o f a g ra p h i c al w se r i n terface, G UI (p ro n o u n c ed g oo ey , Before going into more detail concerning MM, we shall solve a geometry optimization using the GUT of PCMODEL (Serena Sortware). The input is constructed by using a mouse to point and click on each atom of the connected atom list or skeleton of the molecule. This yields Fig. 4-6 (top). 

Carbon-proton bonds are then assigned by means of the one-bond CH connectivities observed in the CH COSY diagram (Table 44.2). This completes partial structures A and B to the CH skeletons C and D. 

In these simplified representations, called bond-line formulas or carbon skeleton diagrams, the only atoms specifically written in are those that are neither carbon nor hydrogen bound to carbon. Flydrogens bound to these heteroatoms are shown, however. 

Figure 7.1. Early diagrams showing the relationship between stresses created by forces on bones and the internal architecture of the skeleton (a) Culmann s calculation of the stress trajectories in a crane, (b) Wolff s drawing of the trabecular orientation in the upper part of the femur, and (c) a photograph of the cross-section of the upper part of the femur.

At the lowest level, class diagrams can correspond directly to program code attributes and associations turn into pointers or (in languages such as C++) contained objects. Many 00 design tools provide the means to turn a class diagram into skeleton code and vice versa. However, we should be careful not to use this facility too readily it is useful only at the very bottom layer of design. 

It is advantageous to introduce at this stage the notion of a skeleton diagram. Every diagram where there are no two successive interactions acting on the same pair of particles is a skeleton diagram or skeleton (see Fig. 3). With any diagram... 

For the case of chiral ligands (with which this section is exclusively concerned), it is easy to convince oneself that the representation (n)u of <5n, whose diagram is shown in Fig. 16, is chiral for every skeleton. For, the representation is totally symmetric under all pure permutations, in particular under those belonging to , and antisymmetric under all group elements involving to, in particular under those in the coset of D in . The representations of [Pg.63]

For a given skeleton, the set of chiral Young diagrams (representations) permits us to define a set of numbers which are characteristic of the chiral properties of the skeleton. In this subsection, we consider the properties of these numbers for the case of achiral ligands, <5 =<3 . 

For a given Young diagram, we define the numbers o and u as the lengths of the first row and the first column, respectively. For a given skeleton, we define the four chirality numbers ... 

Table 4 lists, for skeletons i—v, the -chirality functions obtained by the first procedure (%i) and the alternative version of the second procedure (xz) of Section IV, together with the representation of SA and of Young diagrams remain. The parameters A are scalar parameters, the x are pseudoscalar. Different parameters may be used for different representations. 

Figure 75. The biochemical model for indole alkaloid formation in Catharanthus roseus. The arrows represent the direction of the formation and the flux of compounds in skeleton construction. On the diagram, enzymes are shown by a circle.

Figure 25 Energy diagrams for orbital interactions between polysilane skeleton and pendant group. HOMOsi, HOMOp and LUMOs , LUMOp denote the HOMO and LUMO delocalized on the skeleton and a pendant group, respectively, osi-c and a si-c are bonding and antibonding Si-C a orbitals, respectively.

Fig. 3.8. Skeleton diagram with two exchanged Coulomb photons...

The magnitude of the correction of order a Za) may be easily estimated before the calculation is carried out. We need to take into account the skeleton factor 4m Za) /n discussed above in Sect. 2.3, and multiply it by an extra factor a Za). Naively, one could expect a somewhat smaller factor a.(Za)j%. However, it is well known that a convergent diagram with two external photons always produces an extra factor tt in the numerator, thus compensating the factor TT in the denominator generated by the radiative correction. Hence, calculation of the correction of order a(Za) should lead to a numerical factor of order unity multiplied by 4ma(Za) /n . 

Corrections of order Y ZaY are generated by three-loop radiative insertions in the skeleton diagram in Fig. 3.8. All such corrections connected with the diagrams containing at least one one-loop or two-loop polarization insertion were obtained in [58]... 

Coulomb exchange is already taken into account in the construction of the zero-order effective Dirac equation, where the Coulomb source plays the role of the external potential. Hence, additional contributions of order Zaf could be connected only with the high-momentum Coulomb exchanges. Let us start by calculating the contribution of the skeleton Coulomb-Coulomb diagrams with on-shell external electron lines in Fig. 4.3, with the usual hope that the integrals would tell us themselves about any possible inadequacy of such an approximation. 

As usual we start with the skeleton integral contribution in (3.33) corresponding to the two-photon skeleton diagram in Fig. 3.8. Insertion of the factor GE —k ) — 1 in the proton vertex corresponds to the presence of a nontrivial proton form factor . 

The main feature of the polarizability contribution to the energy shift is its logarithmic enhancement [26, 30]. The appearance of the large logarithm may easily be understood with the help of the skeleton integral. The heavy particle factor in the two-photon exchange diagrams is now described by the photon-nucleus inelastic forward Compton amplitude [31]... 

Due to the analogy between contributions of the diagrams with muon and hadron vacuum polarizations, it is easy to see that insertion of hadron vacuum polarization in one of the exchanged photons in the skeleton diagrams with two-photon exchanges generates a correction of order (x Zotf (see Fig. 7.12). Calculation of this correction is straightforward. One may even take into account the composite nature of the proton and include the proton form factors in photon-proton vertices. Such a calculation was performed in [51, 52] and produced a very small contribution... 

---