Detection and quantification

There are many possible means for quantification of the antigen—antibody reaction. Immunoassays may be classified according to the technology used for detection and quantification of the analyte being detected. 

The detection and quantification of cyanobacterial toxins quoted in the above examples required methods which have been undergoing rapid development in recent years, and as the need for greater understanding of the properties and occurrence of the toxins continues to grow, these are continuing to be developed. This has resulted in methods of cyanobacterial toxin detection which are more sensitive, quantitative, reliable, specific and humane. Many of these methods are presented and discussed in the proceedings of a recent conference. 

The application of RPR in the detection and quantification of species formed by spin-trapping the products of radical-monomer reactions is described in Section 3.5.2.1, The application of time-resolved F.PR spectroscopy to study intermolecular radical-alkene reactions in solution is mentioned in Section 3.5.1. 

Quantification Limit of determination Instrument for detection and quantification... 

Downey, G. and Kelly, J.D., Detection and quantification of apple adulteration in diluted and sulfited strawberry and raspberry purees using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 204, 2004. 

Sassanella TM, F Fukumori, M Bagdasarian, RP Hausinger (1997) Use of 4-nitrophenoxyacetic acid for detection and quantification of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-D/a-ketoglutarate dioxygenase activity in 2,4- D-degrading microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 63 1189-1191. 

The detection and quantification of one or more of the above lipid peroxidation produas (primary and/or secondary) in appropriate biofluids and tissue samples serves to provide indices of lipid peroxidation both in ntro and in vivo. However, it must be stressed that it is absolutely essential to ensure that the products monitored do not arise artifactually, a very difiScult task since parameters such as the availability of catalytic trace metal ions and O2, temperature and exposure to light are all capable of promoting the oxidative deterioration of PUFAs. Indeed, one sensible precaution involves the treatment of samples for analysis with sufficient levels of a chainbreaking antioxidant [for example, butylated hydroxy-toluene (BHT)] immediately after collection to retard or prevent peroxidation occurring during periods of storage or preparation. 

The natural matrix materials, which are similar to the actual environmental, clinical, food, or agricultural samples analyzed, are used to validate the complete analytical measurement process including extraction, cleanup and isolation procedures, and the final chromatographic separation, detection, and quantification. 

For the final separation, detection, and quantification of the PAHs, capillary GC and/or LC are used. A variety of GC columns, which often exhibit different selectivity for the various PAHs, are used by the different laboratories for the analyses. The... 

D. Redecker, T. Batinic, I. S. Feder, K. Koseh, U. Schulz, P. Vinuesa, and D. Werner, Biocontrol strain Pseudomomis fluorescens W34 specific detection and quantification in the rhizo.sphere of Cucumis salivus with a DNA probe and characterization by DNA fingerprinting. 2. Natmforsch. 54c 359 (1999). 

Best practices in establishing detection and quantification limits for pesticide residues in foods... 

The definitions of method detection and quantification limits should be reliable and applicable to a variety of extraction procedures and analytical methods. The issue is of particular importance to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also pesticide regulatory and health agencies around the world in risk assessment. The critical question central to risk assessment is assessing the risk posed to a human being from the consumption of foods treated with pesticides, when the amount of the residue present in the food product is reported nondetect (ND) or no detectable residues . 

There are several factors involved in defining the limitations of an analytical method. Selecting the right method for defining these limitations can be as important as the actual definitions. Factors that must be taken into consideration in defining detection and quantification limits are ... 

These two terms (IDL and IQL) define only the limitations of the instmment. When analyzing real-life samples such as plant or animal tissue or even soil and ground water samples, matrix interference must be taken into consideration in order to define detection limits. This is because these real-life matrices are made up of hundreds (or even thousands) of compounds. These compounds may interfere in several ways in the detection and quantification of the analyte of interest. 

Comparison of methods for calculating detection and quantification limits for analytical methods used for food... 

Several methods have been discussed for the determination of method limitations when evaluating procedures for the determination of pesticides in food. A brief comparison of the methods discussed for the determination of the detection and quantification limits of methods used for the analysis of food products can be found in Table 2. 

IEC continues to have numerous applications to the detection and quantification of various inorganic ions.1 1 This is particularly true in water analysis.5-14 Inorganic ions in a variety of other sample types, such as food and beverages,1518 rocks,19-23 biological fluids, (blood, urine, etc.),24-31 pharmaceutical substances,32 33 concentrated acids,34 alcohols,35 and cleanroom air36 have also been analyzed by IEC. IEC has also been employed in isotopic separation of ions,37 including the production of radioisotopes for therapeutic purposes.3839 Typical IEC sample matrices are complex, and may contain substances that interfere with measurement of the ion(s) of interest. The low detection limits required for many IEC separations demand simple extraction procedures and small volumes to avoid over-dilution. Careful choice and manipulation of the eluent(s) may be needed to achieve the desired specificity, especially when multiple ions are to be determined in a single sample. 

Lack of adequate techniques for detection and quantification of suspected chemicals ... 

EELS interfaced to the TEM column. Elements with an atomic number Z < 4 cannot be detected, and quantification of the signal from elements with Z < 8 is difficult. The accuracy of the quantification procedure in the TEM is about 5%, compared with EPMA (about 1-2%), although the actual mass analysed can be very small ( 10-22g). 

---