Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Design matrix, defined

If we let columns in the design matrix define the constituents as follows 1, 2 define the substrate, columns 3, 4 define the amine co-substrate, and columns 5, 6 define the solvent, the first row in the design matrix in Table 11 would thus correspond to a selection of a substrate projected in the [( — ),( — )] quadrant, an amine from the [(—),( + )] quadrant, and a solvent from the [( + ),( + )] quadrant. The other rows define other combinations. The test items selected accordingly are shown in Table 13. To permit fair comparisons as to the performance of the reaction, it is necessary to adjust the experimental conditions for each system to yield an optimum result. The danger of using standardized conditions has been emphasized [1] and the arguments against such a technique are not repeated here. The conditions which afforded a maximum yield were determined by response surface techniques and these results are also shown in Table 13. [Pg.47]

The die-away curves were analyzed by an unweighted least squares method. Parameter variances were estimated from the inverse design matrix defined by a Taylor expansion [40] of the non-linear model and the estimated error variance. Unweighted analysis was selected because measurement errors in the mass spectrometer are constants, approximating 0.003 atom percent excess. [Pg.27]

Thus, in the nominal-is-besf case, the signal-to-noise (s/n) ratio is defined, for each run of the design matrix, as... [Pg.75]

Let us now consider how to construct FUFE and FRFE matrices. The number of trials is defined in the first column of the FUFE design matrix. The next column is a fictional variable (x0 =+l) that is used to estimate the b0 free member in the regression equation. The number of matrix columns that corresponds to the number of factors. Sometimes columns which correspond to factor interactions are also... [Pg.268]

Conditions (2.76) and (2.77) define independence of the design from rotation of coordinates. When selecting the null/centerpoints points (points in experimental center) take into consideration a check of lack of fit of the model, an estimate of experimental error and conditions of uniformity [37]. Centerpoints are created by setting all factors at their midpoints. In coded form, centerpoints fall at the all-zero level. The centerpoints act as a barometer of the variability in the system. All the necessary data for constructing the rotatable design matrix for k<7 are in Table 2.137. This kind of designing is called central, because all experimental points are symmetrical with reference to the experimental center. This is shown graphically for k=2 and k=3 in Fig. 2.40. [Pg.324]

The design matrix has been defined in accord with the theory of extreme vertices designing of experiments Table 3.34. [Pg.515]

The design matrix has been defined for a third-order regression model, as previous research proved that such a model may adequately describe experimental outcomes. Regression coefficients are determined from the relations ... [Pg.516]

The true model parameters (ft, ftj(...) are partial derivatives of the response function / and cannot be measured directly. It is, however, possible to otain estimates, ft, bV], bVl, of these parameters by multiple regression methods in which the polynomial model is fitted to known experimental results obtained by varying the settings of xr. These variations will then define an experimental design and are conveniently displayed as a design matrix, D, in which the rows describe the settings in the individual experiments and the columns describe the variations of the experimental variables over the series of experiments. [Pg.9]

The selection of test items by such a design can be accomplished as follows For each constituent of the reaction system, two principal property axes should be considered. The columns of a two-level fractional factorial design matrix contain an equal number of minus and plus signs. If we let the columns pairwise define the selection of test systems, four combinations of signs are possible [(—),(—)], [(-), (+)]. [(+), (—)]. and [( + ), (+)]. These combinations of signs correspond to different quadrants in the score plots. Hence we can use the sign combinations of two columns to define from which quadrant in the score plot a test item should... [Pg.46]

In an experimental design, the settings of the variables are given by the row vector x = [x1. .. xk] in the design matrix. When there are several responses, the result will define a response vector, y = [yt. .. ym]. For the whole set of experiments these vectors define a response matrix, Y. [Pg.49]

Another example-. We can study seven variables in a 2 fractional factorial design. This design is defined from the model matrix of a 7 factorial design, see Fig. 6.2. [Pg.127]

The model matrix X is defined from the postulated model and the design matrix. Provided that a reasonable model can be suggested, it will thus be possible to select a series of experiments in such a way that X X has a maximum value. These experiments will then allow the parameters of the suggested model to be estimated with a maximum precision. Such a design is said to be D-optimal (D stands for "determinant"). The D-optimality criterion can be used to select experiments for screening. [Pg.183]

The equiradial designs are useful when two experimental variables are studied. The coded experimental settings are evenly distributed on the periphery of the unit circle, and with at least one experiment at the center point. Without the center point the X X matrix will be singular. The designs are defined by the following relations ... [Pg.296]

The experimental design matrix and the yields of the enamine and the by-product were used to define the X block and the Y block, respectively. These data are recapitulated in Table 17.5. [Pg.469]

Regression leads to a model estimating the relation between the Ai x 1 response vector y, and the Ai x r model matrix X (7,17,116) (Eq. 2.27). N is the number of design experiments, and t the number of terms included in the model. For example, in Equation 2.26, the number of terms equals six, since one intercept, two main effect terms, one interaction term, and two quadratic effect terms were included. The model matrix X is obtained by adding a row of ones before the Aix (r-1) design matrix, which consists of the coded factor levels and columns of contrast coefficients, as defined by the chosen experimental design. [Pg.62]

There are 2 independent generators as there are 2 partitions, and a total of 3 (2 ) generators, as I is excluded from their number. The defining relation of a fractional factorial design matrix consists of all its generators. For the design in table 3.16 it is ... [Pg.128]

Optimal designs are usually generated by computer programs, from a set of candidate points provided by the user. Since the information matrix depends on the design matrix X, whose columns are defined by the model used to fit the data, the experimenter must assume a specific model as correct, to find the D- or A-optimal design corresponding to it. If a second, different model turns out to be more adequate, its parameters will not be alphabetically optimal for the design chosen on the basis of the first model. [Pg.289]


See other pages where Design matrix, defined is mentioned: [Pg.778]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.89]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.55 ]




SEARCH



Defined design

Design matrix

Matrix, defined

© 2024 chempedia.info