Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Descriptors mechanics

Fey N (2010) The contribution of computational studies to organometallic catalysis descriptors, mechanisms and models. Dalton Trans 39 296-310... [Pg.81]

Molecular dipole moments are often used as descriptors in QPSR models. They are calculated reliably by most quantum mechanical techniques, not least because they are part of the parameterization data for semi-empirical MO techniques. Higher multipole moments are especially easily available from semi-empirical calculations using the natural atomic orbital-point charge (NAO-PC) technique [40], but can also be calculated rehably using ab-initio or DFT methods. They have been used for some QSPR models. [Pg.392]

The molecular electronic polarizability is one of the most important descriptors used in QSPR models. Paradoxically, although it is an electronic property, it is often easier to calculate the polarizability by an additive method (see Section 7.1) than quantum mechanically. Ah-initio and DFT methods need very large basis sets before they give accurate polarizabilities. Accurate molecular polarizabilities are available from semi-empirical MO calculations very easily using a modified version of a simple variational technique proposed by Rivail and co-workers [41]. The molecular electronic polarizability correlates quite strongly with the molecular volume, although there are many cases where both descriptors are useful in QSPR models. [Pg.392]

The MEP at the molecular surface has been used for many QSAR and QSPR applications. Quantum mechanically calculated MEPs are more detailed and accurate at the important areas of the surface than those derived from net atomic charges and are therefore usually preferable [Ij. However, any of the techniques based on MEPs calculated from net atomic charges can be used for full quantum mechanical calculations, and vice versa. The best-known descriptors based on the statistics of the MEP at the molecular surface are those introduced by Murray and Politzer [44]. These were originally formulated for DFT calculations using an isodensity surface. They have also been used very extensively with semi-empirical MO techniques and solvent-accessible surfaces [1, 2]. The charged polar surface area (CPSA) descriptors proposed by Stanton and Jurs [45] are also based on charges derived from semi-empirical MO calculations. [Pg.393]

Breindl et. al. published a model based on semi-empirical quantum mechanical descriptors and back-propagation neural networks [14]. The training data set consisted of 1085 compounds, and 36 descriptors were derived from AMI and PM3 calculations describing electronic and spatial effects. The best results with a standard deviation of 0.41 were obtained with the AMl-based descriptors and a net architecture 16-25-1, corresponding to 451 adjustable parameters and a ratio of 2.17 to the number of input data. For a test data set a standard deviation of 0.53 was reported, which is quite close to the training model. [Pg.494]

A descriptor for the 3D arrangement of atoms in a molceulc can be derived in a similar manner. The Cartesian coordinates of the atoms in a molecule can be calculated by semi-empirical quantum mechanical or molecular mechanics (force field) methods, For larger data sets, fast 3D structure generators are available that combine data- and rule-driven methods to calculate Cartesian coordinates from the connection table of a molecule (e.g., CORINA [10]). [Pg.517]

Quantum mechanical descriptors (e.g. HOMO-LUMO energy gap) 3D structure See Section 2.7.4... [Pg.685]

Some properties, such as the molecular size, can be computed directly from the molecular geometry. This is particularly important, because these properties are accessible from molecular mechanics calculations. Many descriptors for quantitative structure activity or property relationship calculations can be computed from the geometry only. [Pg.107]

Molecular descriptors must then be computed. Any numerical value that describes the molecule could be used. Many descriptors are obtained from molecular mechanics or semiempirical calculations. Energies, population analysis, and vibrational frequency analysis with its associated thermodynamic quantities are often obtained this way. Ah initio results can be used reliably, but are often avoided due to the large amount of computation necessary. The largest percentage of descriptors are easily determined values, such as molecular weights, topological indexes, moments of inertia, and so on. Table 30.1 lists some of the descriptors that have been found to be useful in previous studies. These are discussed in more detail in the review articles listed in the bibliography. [Pg.244]

The molecular mechanics force fields available include MM+, OPLS, BIO+, and AMBER. Parameters missing from the force field will be automatically estimated. The user has some control over cutoff distances for various terms in the energy expression. Solvent molecules can be included along with periodic boundary conditions. The molecular mechanics calculations tested ran without difficulties. Biomolecule computational abilities are aided by functions for superimposing molecules, conformation searching, and QSAR descriptor calculation. [Pg.328]

The expressions derived from statistieal mechanics are often rewritten into a computationally more suitable form, which may be evaluated from the basic descriptors positions r, velocities v or momenta p and energies E. [Pg.378]

Our approach is to examine small, closely-related series of nitrosamines and to develop structure-activity models based on molecular descriptors which are explicitly meaningful with respect to the organic chemistry and biochemistry of the compounds. The forms of these models can then often be interpreted in terms of the mechanisms through which these compounds exert their carcinogenic effects. [Pg.77]

An alternative viewpoint for structure-activity investigations is to utilize quantitative models as probes into the mechanism of action of the set of compounds being studied. In this case it is most useful if the molecular descriptors are explicitly meaningful in terms of chemical reactivity or physiological behavior, e.g., distribution of the compound in an organism (see Table II). In a previous symposium, (18), we described our application of this approach toward the development of a quantitative structure-potency expression, equation 1,... [Pg.78]

Our basic methods have been detailed In previous reports (11, 12). In summary, however, our approach Is basically the same as that used by Hansch and co-workers (20-22) A set of compounds, which can reasonably be expected to elicit their carcinogenic response via the same general mechanism. Is chosen, and their relative biological activities, along with a set of molecular descriptors. Is entered Into a computer. The computer, using the relative biological response as the dependent variable, then performs stepwise multiple regression anayses (23) to select... [Pg.79]

Usually aquatic toxicity of chemicals with general narcosis mechanism of action is described by the octanol/water partition coefficient [73]. However, log is a composite descriptor which has components of molecular volume and H-bond acceptor terms. Raevsky and Dearden [74] therefore used molecular polarizabihty (as a volume-related term) and the H-bond acceptor factor instead of log to model aquatic toxicity (log LC50) to the guppy for 90 chemicals with general narcosis mechanisms. This excellent correlation has statistical criteria better than that obtained for the same data using log Pofy, ... [Pg.149]

Raevsky, O. A., Dearden, J. C. Creation of predictive models of aquatic toxicity of environmental pollutants with different mechanisms of action on the basis of molecular similarity and HYBOT descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2004, 15, 433-448. [Pg.154]

Prediction of ADME properties should be simple, since the number of descriptors underlying the properties is relatively small, compared to the number associated with effective drug-receptor binding space. In fact, prediction of ADME is difficult The current ADME experimental data reflect a multiplicity of mechanisms, making prediction uncertain. Screening systems for biological activity are typically single mechanisms, where computational models are easier to develop [1],... [Pg.3]

MolSurf parameters [33] are descriptors derived from quantum mechanical calculations. These descriptors are computed at a surface of constant electron density, with which a very fine description of the properties of a molecule at the Van der Waals surface can be obtained. They describe various electrostatic properties such as hydrogen-bonding strengths and polarizability, as well as Lewis base and acid strengths. MolSurf parameters are computed using the following protocol. [Pg.390]

Table 1 Calculation of some molecular-based descriptors for BOA, DIMBOA and MBOA. Physicochemical descriptor like logP (partition coefficient between octanol and water) constitutional descriptors like the number of a specified atoms or bonds (number of carbons, hydrogens, oxygens, nitrogens, single and aromatic bonds, the total number of atoms and bonds) and molecular weight quantum-mechanical descriptors like HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) and LUMO (Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital). Table 1 Calculation of some molecular-based descriptors for BOA, DIMBOA and MBOA. Physicochemical descriptor like logP (partition coefficient between octanol and water) constitutional descriptors like the number of a specified atoms or bonds (number of carbons, hydrogens, oxygens, nitrogens, single and aromatic bonds, the total number of atoms and bonds) and molecular weight quantum-mechanical descriptors like HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) and LUMO (Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital).

See other pages where Descriptors mechanics is mentioned: [Pg.329]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.424]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.555 ]




SEARCH



Quantum mechanical descriptors

Quantum mechanics derived descriptors

© 2024 chempedia.info