Deflection temperature under load test

Two particular test methods have become very widely used. They are the Vicat softening point test (VSP test) and the heat deflection temperature under load test (HDT test) (which is also widely known by the earlier name of heat distortion temperature test). In the Vicat test a sample of the plastics material is heated at a specified rate of temperature increase and the temperature is noted at which a needle of specified dimensions indents into the material a specified distance under a specified load. In the most common method (method A) a load of ION is used, the needle indentor has a cross-sectional area of 1 mm, the specified penetration distance is 1 mm and the rate of temperature rise is 50°C per hour. For details see the relevant standards (ISO 306 BS 2782 method 120 ASTM D1525 and DIN 53460). (ISO 306 describes two methods, method A with a load of ION and method B with a load of SON, each with two possible rates of temperature rise, 50°C/h and 120°C/h. This results in ISO values quoted as A50, A120, B50 or B120. Many of the results quoted in this book predate the ISO standard and unless otherwise stated may be assumed to correspond to A50.)... 

In the deflection temperature under load test (heat distortion temperature test) the temperature is noted at which a bar of material subjected to a three-point bending stress is deformed a specified amount. The load (F) applied to the sample will vary with the thickness (t) and width (tv) of the samples and is determined by the maximum stress specified at the mid-point of the beam (P) which may be either 0.45 MPa (661bf/in ) or 1.82 MPa (264Ibf/in ). 

The ASTM heat distortion temperature (deflection temperature under load) test may be used to characterise a resin. Resins must, however, be compared using identical hardeners and curing conditions. 

Two particular test methods have become very widely used. These are the Vicat softening point test and the test widely known as the heat distortion temperature test (also called the deflection temperature under load test). In the Vicat softening point test a sample of polymer is heated at a specified rate temperature increase and the temperature is noted at which a needle of specified dimensions indents into the polymer a specified distance under a specified load. 

The test apparatus designed for deflection temperature under load test can be used for the Vicat softening temperature test with minor modification. The flat test specimen is molded or cut from a sheet with a minimum thickness and width of 0.12 and 0.50 in., respectively. 

To enhance the resistance to heat softening his-phenol A is substituted by a stiffer molecule. Conventional bis-phenol A polycarbonates have lower heat distortion temperatures (deflection temperatures under load) than some of the somewhat newer aromatic thermoplastics described in the next chapter, such as the polysulphones. In 1979 a polycarbonate in which the bis-phenol A was replaced by tetramethylbis-phenol A was test marketed. This material had a Vicat softening point of 196 C, excellent resistance to hydrolysis, excellent resistance to tracking and a low density of about l.lg/cm-. Such improvements were obtained at the expense of impact strength and resistance to stress cracking. 

The strength properties more often specified for plastics materials are (1) tensile strength and elongation, (2) flexural strength, (3) Izod and Gardner impact, and (4) heat deflection temperature under load. Our purpose here is not to describe each test in detail but to point out some of the known effects that colorants and other formulation ingredients can have on these properties. Table 22.1 lists the ISO and ASTM test methods for most of the physical properties, and ref. 1 (pp. 7-112) describes each of the methods in detail. Table 22.2 lists typical values of the above cite four properties for selected thermoplastics. 

Mechanical properties (57) have been measured for epoxies to which 2,3-epoxypropyl modifiers, e.g., bis(2,3-epoxypropyloxy) neopentane, were added. Increases in impact strength were noted for all 2,3-epoxypropyl modifiers, but tensile strength was either increased or reduced depending on the individual modifier. In most oases viscosity was reduced and and deflection temperature under load were always reduced. For nearly all the 2,3-epoxypropyl compounds tested, fracture toughness was increased. 

---