Dead membrane technology

Vourch et al49 studied the applicability of the RO process for the dairy industry wastewater. The treated wastewater total organic carbon (TOC) was <7 mg/L. It was found that in order to treat a flow of 100 m3/d, 540 m2 of the RO unit is required with 95% water recovery. Dead-end NF and RO were studied for the treatment of dairy wastewater.50 Permeate COD, monovalent ion rejection, and multivalent ion rejection for the dead-end NF were reported as 173-1095 mg/L, 50-84%, and 92.4-99.9%, respectively. When it comes to the dead-end RO membranes, the values for permeate COD, monovalent ion removal, and multivalent ion removal were 45-120 mg/L, >93.8%, and 99.6%, respectively. Membrane filtration technology can be better utilized as a tertiary treatment technology and the resultant effluent quality will be high. There can be situations where the treated effluents can be reused (especially if RO is used for the treatment). 

All experimental setups described in the literature for the separation of homogeneous catalysts by membrane filtration technology can be divided into two general classes Dead-end filtration and cross-flow filtration. The first type of unit is characterized by a product flow perpendicular to the surface of the membrane, while the flow in the case of cross-flow filtration is parallel to the membrane surface (see Figure 4.1). 

Enzymatic reactions are commonly observed or practiced in various kinds of food and biotechnology products. With the goals of reducing operating costs and improving product quality, a number of enzyme immobilization techniques have been developed in recent decades [Woodward, 1985]. The availability of robust membranes, particularly porous inorganic membranes, has improved the enzyme immobilization technology. One type of membrane bioieactors immobilizes enzyme in the membrane pores by dead-end filtration of the enzyme solution. 

In filtration unit operation, especially in microfiltration, one usually differentiates between dead-end filtration (with cake formation) and cross-flow filtration [25] (Fig. 5). The cross-flow filter can have different geometries (Fig. 6) phase membranes, tubular membranes, or pleated membranes, of which the tubular and pleated ones are already accepted as cross-flow geometries in reactor technology, as mentioned above. In filtration engineering the cross-flow term means that the filtrate flows perpendicularly to the suspension stream. Cross-flow may not be considered a sufficiently illustrative term here [25]. A better term would be parallel filtration, but the term cross-flow filtration has been accepted generally and may be difficult to change at present. 

Chan et al. (2005), have realised micro fuel cells through an approach that combines thin film materials with MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical system) technology. The membrane electrode assembly was embedded in a polymeric substrate (PMMA) which was micromachined through laser ablation to form gas flow channels. The micro gas channels were sputtered with gold to serve as current collectors. This cell utilized the water generated by the reaction for the humidification of dry reactants (H2 and O2). The peak power density achieved was 315 mW cm (901 mA cm" at 0.35 V) for the H2-O2 system with 20 ml min" O2 supply and H2 at 10 psi in dead ended mode of operation. A Y shaped microfluidic channel is depicted in Fig. 21. 

---