Deactivating groups, in electrophilic

The pKa of p-(tiifluoromethyl)benzoic acid is 3.6. Is the trifluoromethyl substituent an activating or deactivating group in electrophilic aromatic substitution ... 

We recall that chlorine and bromine are deactivating groups in electrophilic aromatic substitution because they withdraw electron density by an inductive effect but are ineffective in the donation of electron density by resonance. The same features are important in controlling the rate of the second step of ketone halogenation. The bromine atom withdraws electron density from the carbonyl carbon atom, making the carbonyl oxygen atom less basic. Therefore, the enol forms more slowly in the second step. 

Exercise 22-24 Draw the structures of the intermediate cations for nitration of nitrobenzene in the 2, 3, and 4 positions. Use the structures to explain why the nitro group is meta-orienting with deactivation. Use the same kind of arguments to explain the orientation observed with —CF3, —CHO, —CH2Ci, and —NH2 groups in electrophilic aromatic substitution (Table 22-6),... 

Section 10.6), the strength of F-substituted carboxylic acids, the deactivating effect of the CF3 group in electrophilic aromatic substitutions, and the non-basic character of NF3 and (CF3)3N (see end-of-chapter problem 17.4). 

Deactivating groups in one ring usually direct electrophilic substitutions to the other ring and preferentially in the positions C5 and C8. 

The caibonyl group in aldehydes, ketones, acids, esters, and amides is deactivating and wcto-directing. There are distinct limitations on the types of substitution reactions that are satisfiictory for these deactivating substituents. In general, only those electrophiles in category A in Scheme 10.1 react readily. 

The way in which various substituents affect the polarization of a carbonyl group is similar to the way they affect the reactivity of an aromatic ring toward electrophilic substitution (Section 16.5). A chlorine substituent, for example, inductively withdraws electrons from an acyl group in the same way that it withdraws elections from and thus deactivates an aromatic ring. Similarly, amino, methoxvl, and methylthio substituents donate electrons to acyl groups by resonance in the same way that they donate electrons to and thus activate aromatic rings. 

Nitration by nitric acid in sulphuric acid has also been by Modro and Ridd52 in a kinetic study of the mechanism by which the substituent effects of positive poles are transmitted in electrophilic substitution. The rate coefficients for nitration of the compounds Pl CHi NMej (n = 0-3) given in Table 10 show that insertion of methylene groups causes a substantial decrease in deactivation by the NMej group as expected. Since analysis of this effect is complicated by the superimposed activation by the introduced alkyl group, the reactivities of the... 

In the discussion of electrophilic aromatic substitution (Chapter 11) equal attention was paid to the effect of substrate structure on reactivity (activation or deactivation) and on orientation. The question of orientation was important because in a typical substitution there are four or five hydrogens that could serve as leaving groups. This type of question is much less important for aromatic nucleophilic substitution, since in most cases there is only one potential leaving group in a molecule. Therefore attention is largely focused on the reactivity of one molecule compared with another and not on the comparison of the reactivity of different positions within the same molecule. 

The acetylation over protonic zeolites of aromatic substrates with acetic anhydride was widely investigated. Essentially HFAU, HBEA, and HMFI were used as catalysts, most of the reactions being carried out in batch reactors, often in the presence of solvent. Owing to the deactivation effect of the acetyl group, acetylation is limited to monoacetylated products. As could be expected in electrophilic substitution, the reactivity of the aromatic substrates is strongly influenced by the substituents, for example, anisole > m-xylene > toluene > fluorobenzene. Moreover, with the poorly activated substrates (m-xylene, toluene, and fluoroben-zene) there is a quasi-immediate inhibition of the reaction. It is not the case with activated substrates such as anisole and more generally aromatic ethers. It is why we have chosen the acetylation of anisole and 2-methoxynaphtalene as an example. 

---