Dactylis glomerata

Jay, M. and Lumaret, R. 1995. Variation in the subtropical group of Dactylis glomerata L.—2. Evidence from phenolic compound patterns. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 23 523-531. 

Durtn-Serantes B, Gonzflez L, Reigosa MJ (2002) Comparative physiological effects of three allelochemicals and two herbicides on Dactylis glomerata. Acta Physiol Plant 24 385-392... 

GRASS, Kentucky blue (Poa pratensis L.) GRASS, orchard (Dactylis glomerata L.)... 

Pollock, C.J. Ruggles, P.A. (1976). Cold-induced fructosan synthesis in leaves of Dactylis glomerata. Phytochemistry 15, 1643-6. 

Rasmussen, G. Olsen, R. A. (2004). Sorption and biological removal of creosote-contaminants from groundwater in soil/sand vegetated with orchard grass Dactylis glomerata). Advances in Environmental Research, 8, 313-27. 

Habit and type host Stromata covering inflorescence primordia of Dactylis glomerata. 

Western JH, Cavett JJ. The choke disease of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) caused by Epichloe typhina. Trans Br Mycol Soc 42 298-307, 1959. 

Morgan-Jones G, White JF Jr, Pointelli EL. Endophyte-host associations in forage grasses. 8. Acremonium chilense, an undescribed endophyte occurring in Dactylis glomerata in Chile. Mycotaxon 39 441-454, 1990. 

Sensitive species are those, which are gradually eliminated from the polluted area, such as Capsella bursa-pastoris, Cardaria dvaba, Cichorium in-tybus, Dactylis glomerata, Stellaria media, Veronica hederifolia, Hypericum perforatum, Plantago major, Papaver rhoeas, Viola tricolor, Melilotus officinalis, Onopordum acanthium, Symphytum officinale. Ranunculus arven-... 

The resistant species, characterized by an increased vitality, adaptability or even stimulation are Dactylis glomerata, Junctus effusus, Rubus fructi-cosus, etc. These species form a rapidly growing cover. 

Dactylis glomerata leaves collected at their sites before they had been used for enzymatic assays or metal content analysis. 

Table 1. Mass (g diy weight m-2) of remaining and percent (%) of initial mass of exposed natural plant (NPL) and polypropylene (PP) litter during the course of the experiment. Significance of differences between treatments are assessed by non-parametric Wilcoxon Sum-of-Ranks (Mann-Whitney) test. AH data from five natural litter treatments (I Dactylis glomerata II Festuca rubra and III Trijblium pratense), IV mixture of three species I, II and III V mixture of twelve species, IV and nine other meadow plants) were analyzed with the exception of month where only data of treatments I and HI were used. Standard errors in parentheses.

---