Cyclic Nernst equation

A reversible one-electron transfer process (19) is initially examined. For all forms of hydrodynamic electrode, material reaches the electrode via diffusion and convection. In the cases of the RDE and ChE under steady-state conditions, solutions to the mass transport equations are combined with the Nernst equation to obtain the reversible response shown in Fig. 26. A sigmoidal-shaped voltammogram is obtained, in contrast to the peak-shaped voltammetric response obtained in cyclic voltammetry. 

Our example in polarography illustrates how a spreadsheet can be used to simulate a rather complex curve, in this case reflecting the interplay between the Nernst equation, Fick s law of diffusion, and drop growth. The first two factors also play a role in cyclic voltammetry, where we introduce semi-integration as an example of deconvolution. 

Axial-ligand binding constants, for example to Fe and Fe porphyrins, can be measured in favorable cases by measuring the Ei/2 values for the Fe VFe and Fe VFe waves by cyclic voltammetry as a function of the concentration of axial ligand and then fitting the ligand concentration dependence of the reduction potential observed for each half-reaction to the full Nernst equation, ... 

Reversible cyclic voltammograms are not always governed by diffusion-controlled processes. For example, the cases of a redox reagent adsorbed onto an electrode surface or confined to a thin layer of solution adjacent to the electrode surface are also of considerable importance. In fact, the same theory may be applied to both adsorbed layers [52] and processes that occur in thin layers [53] (thinner than the diffusion layer). In both these cases, the current for the reversible process can be derived by substitution of the expression / (f) = E4 p into the Nernst equation (Eq. II. 1.7) and noting thatE (f) = Einmai - vt, [B] c=o = [A]bulk - [A]x=o. and Vis the volume of the thin layer (Eq. II. 1.12a)... 

Fig. 1 shows typical cyclic voltammogr ams with and without large excess of CD. The shape of the voltammogr am is sensitive to the heterogeneous electron transfer rate[8] between the substrate and electrode, and also to the dissociation and formation rates. If the electron transfer is reversible, i.e., the concentrations of the electroactive species at the electrode surface are determined by the Nernst equation, and if the relative contribution of the latter factor is small, the cyclic voltammogram shows a typical shape[8] with reversible electron transfer and no chemical reaction. In this case, the electrochemical response is purely controlled by the diffusion process of the substrate, CD and the complex. The peak separation in this case is 57 mV at 25°C, which is not affected by addition of CD to the electrolyte solution. This situation is usually attained by the use of slow scan rates[9] in CV. Since complexation reaction can be assumed to remain at equilibrium everywhere in the diffusion layer in the present circumstance, the apparent diffusion coefficient, D from the voltammogram in the presence of CD is written as... 

It must be emphasised that a reversible cyclic voltammogram can only be observed if both 0 and R are stable and the kinetics of the electron transfer process are fast, so that at all potentials and potential scan rates the electron transfer process on the surface is in equilibrium (remember this is a relative term dependent on a comparison of the rates of the forward and back electron transfer reactions with the prevailing rate of diffusion of material to and from the surface), so that surface concentrations follow (and may be calculated from) the Nernst equation. 

The for a half-reaction is the potential of that reaction versus the standard hydrogen electrode, with all species at unit activity. Most reduction potentials are not determined under such conditions, so it is expedient to define a formal reduction potential. This is a reduction potential measured under conditions where the reaction quotient in the Nernst equation is one and other nonstandard conditions are described solvent, electrolyte, pN, and so on. Formal reduction potentials are represented by °. Reduction potentials determined by cyclic voltammetry are usually formal potentials. The difference between standard and formal potentials is not expected to be great. Other definitions of the formal potential are offered. ... 

In 2002, Uhneanu et al. used a thin organic layer that is supported by a porous hydrophobic membrane such as porous Teflon or poly vinylidenedifluoride (PVDF), or sandwiched between two aqueous dialysis membranes [295]. With this setup, they showed that the transfer of highly hydrophilic ions at one interface can be studied by limiting the mass transfer of the other ion-transfer reaction at the other interface. They have also shown that cyclic voltammetry for coupled ion-transfer reactions at the two interfaces in series is analogous to cyclic voltammetry for electron-transfer reactions studied by Stewart et al. [207], as the diffusion equations of the reactants and products are analogous, and as the overall Nernst equation for the coupled ion transfer equal to the two individual Nemst equations for ion distribution is also analogous to the Nemst equation for the heterogeneous ET. 

Cyclic voltammograms calculated for different values of the parameter/are shown in Figure 15.7. One should note that in the case of adsorbed intermediates discussed here, the peak onrent density is independent of concentration, while the peak potential depends on it through a Nernst-type equation. This is in contrast with the similar equations for reaction of a bulk species, where jp is proportional to the bulk concentration (Eq. (15.9) and Eq. (15.11)), while Ep is independent of it, for a simple stoichiometry (Eq. (15.4) and Eq. (15.10)). Also, the anodic and cathodic peaks for formation and removal of an adsorbed species occur at exactly the same potential, unlike the case of reaction of a bulk species. 

---