Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Current/voltage response dark/illuminated

Figure 5. Photosensitization vs. photoelectrocatalytic reactions. At top, the illuminated current/voltage curve is placed negative of the current/voltage response on bare Pt in the dark. At bottom the current/voltage curve indicates an increase in reaction rate, but no change in the apparent emf of the reaction. Figure 5. Photosensitization vs. photoelectrocatalytic reactions. At top, the illuminated current/voltage curve is placed negative of the current/voltage response on bare Pt in the dark. At bottom the current/voltage curve indicates an increase in reaction rate, but no change in the apparent emf of the reaction.
In-situ SPV measurements seem possible with minor modifications (1) the tip potential (versus the reference) is set at a value close to the rest potential of the semiconductor in darkness (this must be compatible with the electrochemical response of the tip), and (2) the tip current is quenched by adjusting the sample voltage (versus the reference) with the second feedback system. With p-type materials the method seems more obvious than with n-type specimens, since illumination promotes surface electrons. At n-type materials SPV measurements will induce corrosion since holes are driven to the interface. If absolute measurements of the SPV seem difficult, because they depend on the adjustment of the tip potential, differential measurements appear accessible to experiment. [Pg.59]

Photovoltaic cells were prepared with a polymer layer sandwiched between electrodes with different work functions, as in polymer-based LEDs (Fig. 29.2). In the dark, the device exhibits a rectification ratio of 10 at 3.5 V. Under illumination, devices of this type show a strong photoresponse, with open-circuit voltages of 0.6 V and short-circuit currents that correspond to quantum efficiencies of up to 6%. Under forward or reverse biases, the quantum efficiencies rise rapidly, reaching 15% at a reverse bias of 3.5 V, 40% at 10 V. and considerably higher values under forward bias. These performance figures are very much better than those for devices made with aluminum electrodes and either MEH-PPV or CN-PPV alone. Thus, Halls et al. report values for the quantum yield of the short-circuit photocurrent in the MEH-PPV of 0.04% at the peak response wavelength (2.2 eV) and on the order of 10 %... [Pg.839]


See other pages where Current/voltage response dark/illuminated is mentioned: [Pg.210]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.77]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Current-voltage

Current/voltage response

Dark current

Dark current/response

Dark current/voltage response

Illuminated

Illuminated current/voltage response

Illuminated currents

Illumination

Voltage responsivity

© 2024 chempedia.info