Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

CT Complex Excitation

A charge-transfer complex (CT complex or CTQ is involved in all thermal charge-transfer polymerizations and in most of the photo-induced charge-transfer copolymerizations. Mixing of a donor (D), such as VCZ, with an acceptor, such as tetracyanoethylene (TCNE), immediately produces color [31] due to the formation of a CT complex  [Pg.10]

As to chemical reactivity, whether or not CT complexes react with external reagents is a vigorously debated topic. However, intramolecular reactions of the components with each other are firmly established. [Pg.11]

As mentioned above, in photoreactions, the intermediates are formed through the excitation of one partner or the excitation of CT complex. In the former case, the excited molecule interacts with the partner to form the exdplex, while the latter produces excited EDA complex or in short, excited complex . Actually, some studies have shown that exciplexes and excited complexes are identical species [32-35] 1) They have the same spectral character. For example, when 0.12 M Pms-stilbene and 0.43 M fumaronitrile are excited in the charge-transfer absorption band (360 nm), both the spectral distribution and lifetime of this emission are identical with those obtained for their exciplex [36]. 2) They undergo the same follow-up reactions. Lewis [35] reported a similar cycloaddition quantum yield of the two above processes in the photocycloaddition of stilbene with dimethyl fumarate. Accordingly, here we will use them interchangeably. [Pg.11]


Compared to excitation of the CT complex, excitation of monomer is a more effective pathway for polymerization or cycloaddition. [Pg.13]

If there is a nonnegligible electronic interaction between adjacent chromophoric units already in the ground state, the absorption spectrum of the species may substantially differ from the sum of the absorption spectra of the component units. When the units have the same chemical nature, the interaction leads to formation of dimers. When the two units eu-e different, the interaction is usually CT in nature with formation of CT complexes. Excitation of such dimers leads to an excited state that is substantially the same as the corresponding excimers, and excitation of the CT ground state complexes leads to an excited state that is substantially the same as that of the corresponding exciplexes. [Pg.113]

Figure 5.9 Formation of hydrogen peroxides by means of plastic-oxygen-charge-transfer-complex (CT-complex) excited state [38]... Figure 5.9 Formation of hydrogen peroxides by means of plastic-oxygen-charge-transfer-complex (CT-complex) excited state [38]...
CT) complex with absorption maxima at 470 and 550nm, was produced. These species were formed only in polar solvents with relatively high proton affinity. The data suggested an intermolecular proton transfer, from electronically excited TNB to the solvent forming the anion... [Pg.737]

In this paper, we report efforts to find donor/acceptor systems, comprised of at least one multifunctional monomer, capable of sustaining rapid free-radical polymerization without the need for external photoinitiators. Although we will include in this report comonomer systems which form ground state CT complexes, we stress that the primary mechanism for generating free-radical in each case may not be via excitation of ground state CT complexes. [Pg.134]

Photochemical ET reactions can be classified in at least three categories (which can co-exist), namely (i) simple homolysis of bonds of neutral molecules to give radicals of low redox reactivity (ii) excitation of a species D to produce an excited state D which initiates a second-order ET reaction involving another component of acceptor type, A, with formation of the radical pair D + A (iii) direct excitation of a charge transfer (CT) complex formed between two reaction components D and A to form the same radical pair D + A -. The first case is obviously an ideal situation if it can be realized, but this is seldom the case. The incursion or predominance of situations (ii) and/or (iii) in almost any system is possible, and precautions must be taken to avoid these complications. Much can be done by controlling the wavelength of the light source, but it is also possible to affect the chemistry in a predictable manner. [Pg.119]

The formation of the trinitromethyl adduct of PBN by photolysis of PBN and tetranitromethane (Okhlobystina et al., 1975) is an unequivocal case of inverted spin trapping. These components give an orange-red CT complex in, for example, dichloromethane when this solution is irradiated by light which only can excite the CT complex (A > 430 nm) the spin adduct (N02)3C-PBN is formed via reaction (46) (Eberson et al., 1994b). This adduct is highly persistent. When the solution is acidified by —2% trifluoroacetic acid, irradiation does not lead to spin adduct formation owing to protonation of trinitromethanide ion. [Pg.123]

A thermal oxidation of 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene, 16, occurs in NaY when the temperature of the oxygen-loaded zeolite in raised above — 20°C [35], Similar thermally initiated oxidations were not observed for the less electron rich tram-or cix-2-butene. Remarkably, pinacolone was conclusively identified as one of the products of the reaction of 16, This ketone is not a product of the photochemical Frei oxidation (vide supra) and underscores the very different character of these two reactions and the complexity of the oxygen/16 potential energy surface, A rationale for the different behavior could lie in the different electronic states of the reactive oxygen-CT complex in the thermal and photochemical reactions. Irradiation could produce an excited triplet-state CT complex ( [16 O2] ) and/ or ion pair ( [16 02 ] ) with different accessible reaction channels than those available to a vibrationally excited ground-state triplet complex ( [16 "02]) and/... [Pg.302]

Some evidence for ground state CT complex formation is also obtained from such quenching experiments when excited at the second absorption band which has a maximum at 260 nm. A wavelength dependence of quenching constant is observed (Fig. 11.5). [Pg.337]

If the charge transfer (CT) complex is sufficiently strong, the ion-radical pair would dissociate to induce ionic and/or radical reactions. The mechanism of this photoexcitation is different from the n — n or n — n excitations. The later process is the excitation of isolated molecules whereas the CT excitation requires two molecules in contact. Surprisingly, rather limited attention has been directed to this field of photosensitized CT process from the viewpoint of organic reactions. [Pg.323]

Excitation of the charge transfer band is a powerful method to ionize the CT complex, especially when the ionization is not thermally accessible. Several examples are shown below (12, 13). [Pg.325]

The argument on the mechanism of photosensitized charge transfer, as to whether the charge transfer excitation is responsible, or the excitation of an isolated molecule carries out electron transfer in the excited state is not always clear. Even if no CT complex is detected by spectroscopy, this is not conclusive evidence that CT interaction at the ground state does not exist. There are possibilities of overlapping absorptions of the CT band with specific absorptions of donor or acceptor. [Pg.326]

The excited fraws-stilbene/fumaronitrile complex produces a locally excited triplet state, which is considered to be responsible for isomerization of substituted stilbenes. Similarly, the CT complexes between aromatic hydrocarbons and fumaronitrile produce the isomerization of fumaronitrile to malonitrile34. [Pg.371]

The CT complexes are considered to evolve to excited CT complexes. In Scheme 40, an electron is transferred from the amine to the benzophenone (in the triplet state) forming the CT complex. A proton transfer produces an amine radical 100 and a benzhydrol... [Pg.400]

No evidence was found from the picosecond absorption data for an excited state intermediate of the EDA complex. This formulation represente a confirmation of Mulliken s theory, in which CT band excitation of the quite nonpolar ground state produces an ion pair. Accordingly, indene and TCNE form ground state complexes which undergo fast electron transfer on irradition. However, back electron transfer occurs after relatively long time (ca. 500 ps) via a transient... [Pg.230]

The above views regarding the dependence of the Ip and hvct values on the atomic number of M were recently shown to be rather simplified and the approximation in equation 18 to be rough130. The donor component D+ X of the compact radical ion-pair which is formed in the excited state of a CT complex in solution according to equation 20... [Pg.152]

Photoisomerization of charge-transfer (CT) complexes of (E)- and (Z)-l,2-fe-(l-methyl-4-pyridinio)ethenes 99 with iodine can be effected by irradiating at the CT band in acetonitrile (Sch. 41). The CT excitation of the... [Pg.441]


See other pages where CT Complex Excitation is mentioned: [Pg.69]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.54]   


SEARCH



CT excitation

Ct complexes

Excitation complexes

© 2024 chempedia.info