Models CSD

CSD modelling based on population balance considerations may be applied to crystalliser configurations other than MSMPR(37) and this has become a distinct, self-contained branch of reaction engineering)56,59,60 73). 

There are several versions of EH-CSD models. To make the exposition less cumbersome, in the next pages we shall only summarize one version, that was elaborated in Pisa and known with the acronym PCM (Polarizable Continuum Model) (Miertus et al., 1981 Miertus and Tomasi, 1982). We shall consider other versions later, and the differences with respect to PCM will be highlighted. Other approaches, based on effective Hamiltonians expressed in terms of discrete solvent distributions, EH-DSD, or not relying on effective Hamiltonians, will also be considered. 

The potential energy surface used in solution, G (R), is related to an effective Hamiltonian containing a solute-solvent interaction term, Vint- In the implementation of the EH-CSD model, that will be examined in Section 6, use is made of the equilibrium solute-solvent potential. There are good reasons to do so however, when the attention is shifted to a dynamical problem, we have to be careful in the definition of Vint - This operator may be formally related to a response function TZ which depends on time. For simplicity s sake, we may replace here TZ with the polarization vector P, which actually is the most important component of TZ (another important contribution is related to Gdis) For the calculation of Gei (see eq.7), we resort to a static value, while for dynamic calculations we have to use a P(t) function quantum electrodynamics offers the theoretical framework for the calculation of P as well as of TZ. The strict quantum electrodynamical approach is not practical, hence one usually resorts to simple naive models. 

In this section some of the kinetic models for a number of industrially important gas-solid catalytic reactions, are discussed. The historical evolution towards more rigorous CSD models are traced and the degree of reliability of the present models discussed. From the view point of this book which is aiming at introducing mathematical models for industrial catalytic reactors, the ultimate... 

Most gas-solid catalytic reactions follow some form of CSD kinetic model, except for partial oxidation reactions (and similar reactions) where CSD model and Redox models are still competing. In this first case these types of CSD kinetic models are illustrated using an extremely simple reaction, the unimolecular irreversible reaction. 

A second set of phenomena that should be included in CSD modeling is growth rate dispersion. Two possible mechanisms have been modeled and observed experimentally. 

Rawlings etal. (1992) analysed the stability of a eontinuous erystallizer based on the linearization of population and solute balanee. Their model did not depend on a lumped approximation of partial differenee equations and sueeess-fully predieted the oeeurrenee of sustained oseillations. They demonstrated that simple proportional feedbaek eontrol using moments of CSD as measurements ean stabilize the proeess. It was eoneluded that the relatively high levels of error in these measurements require robust design for effeetive eontrol. 

Typical Ni—L bond lengths have been extracted from the Cambridge Structure Database (CSD) and listed in tabular form.321 Also, Ni11—L bond lengths from the CSD have been analyzed by the BDBO technique, which is related to the bond valence model (BVM) where the total bond order is equal to the oxidation state of any atom.322 Selected mean Ni—L distances from the CSD source are collected in Table 2. 

Chemical solution deposition (CSD) procedures have been widely used for the production of both amorphous and crystalline thin films for more than 20 years.1 Both colloidal (particulate) and polymeric-based processes have been developed. Numerous advances have been demonstrated in understanding solution chemistry, film formation behavior, and for crystalline films, phase transformation mechanisms during thermal processing. Several excellent review articles regarding CSD have been published, and the reader is referred to Refs. 5-12 for additional information on the topic. Recently, modeling of phase transformation behavior for control of thin-film microstructure has also been considered, as manipulation of film orientation and microstructure for various applications has grown in interest.13-15... 

These parameters were calculated for the atomic coordinates in the CSD and for the models with a program written by Larry Madsen. Q is the deviation of the ring atoms from a mean plane. 

There is a very small observed range of amplitude (Q), and Q is essentially invariant with D in both models and the CSD. The CSD mean is 0.564 A while the best MM3 model has a Q of 0.570 A, agreeing well. Figure 9b displays the observed Q values and the line from the MM3 models. 

The CSD was serviced by a professional secretariat of pharmacists and medical officers who undertook the assessment of the submissions and presented these to the Committee and its various subcommittees. The secretariat initially included three doctors and two pharmacists. In 1965, the number of professional staff had been increased to six doctors and three pharmacists. Among the six doctors was Dr Denis Cahal, who headed the secretariat. Others were Drs J Broadbent, M Hollyhock, WH Inman, D Mansel-Jones and C Ruttle. The secretriat, known as the Medicines Division, was created as a branch of the Department of Health. The close collaboration between Dr Cahal and Sir Derrick Dunlop was pivotal in guiding the Medicines Act through Parliament in 1968 and setting the foundation of a system that became a model to the rest of the world for fairness and efficiency. 

The development and refinement of population balance techniques for the description of the behavior of laboratory and industrial crystallizers led to the belief that with accurate values for the crystal growth and nucleation kinetics, a simple MSMPR type crystallizer could be accurately modelled in terms of its CSD. Unfortunately, accurate measurement of the CSD with laser light scattering particle size analyzers (especially of the small particles) has revealed that this is not true. In mar cases the CSD data obtained from steady state operation of a MSMPR crystallizer is not a straight line as expected but curves upward (1. 32. 33V This indicates more small particles than predicted... 

A number of investigators developed empirical growth rate expressions that included a size dependence. These models were siunmarized by Randolph Q2> 341 who showed that they all produced a concave upward semi-log population density plot thus are useful for empirical fits of non-linear MSMPR CSD data, lliese models however, supply no information on what is actually happening to cause the non-linear CSD. 

Tavare and Garside ( ) developed a method to employ the time evolution of the CSD in a seeded isothermal batch crystallizer to estimate both growth and nucleation kinetics. In this method, a distinction is made between the seed (S) crystals and those which have nucleated (N crystals). The moment transformation of the population balance model is used to represent the N crystals. A supersaturation balance is written in terms of both the N and S crystals. Experimental size distribution data is used along with a parameter estimation technique to obtain the kinetic constants. The parameter estimation involves a Laplace transform of the experimentally determined size distribution data followed a linear least square analysis. Depending on the form of the nucleation equation employed four, six or eight parameters will be estimated. A nonlinear method of parameter estimation employing desupersaturation curve data has been developed by Witkowki et al (S5). 

The future of on-line control of crystallization should see the use of parameter estimation for estimation and correction of model parameters along with higher level nonlinear control schemes. The major chtdlenge continues to be realistic measurement of the necessary variables such as the CSD or its moments. 

---