Coupled cluster in

The incorporation of radicals is a highly promising way to construct larger magnetically coupled clusters in 4f chemistry [44, 64], but this is yet to happen for the actinides [43]. A promising way forward seems to be the use of redox-active ligands [65]. 

The most practical and useful HoMQC methods are the 2Q- and 3Q-HoMQC techniques. In combination they offer extensive information about connectivity and topology through chemical bonds for most biomolecules. 2Q-HoMQC spectra are perhaps most important because they reveal the smallest coupled clusters in spin systems where at least two spins are connected with reasonable coupling constants. In addition a great variety of other connectivities will usually show up. Sensitivity of 2Q spectra is also... 

In the coupled-cluster (CC) method [61J, one expresses the wavefunctlon In a somewhat different manner ... 

In recent years, these methods have been greatly expanded and have reached a degree of reliability where they now offer some of the most accurate tools for studying excited and ionized states. In particular, the use of time-dependent variational principles have allowed the much more rigorous development of equations for energy differences and nonlinear response properties [81]. In addition, the extension of the EOM theory to include coupled-cluster reference fiuictioiis [ ] now allows one to compute excitation and ionization energies using some of the most accurate ab initio tools. 

The additivity of E and the separability of the equations determining the Cj eoeffieients make the MPPT/MBPT energy size-extensive. This property ean also be demonstrated for the Coupled-Cluster energy (see the referenees given above in Chapter 19.1.4). However, size-extensive methods have at least one serious weakness their energies do not provide upper bounds to the true energies of the system (beeause their energy funetional is not of the expeetation-value form for whieh the upper bound property has been proven). 

Coupled cluster calculations are similar to conhguration interaction calculations in that the wave function is a linear combination of many determinants. However, the means for choosing the determinants in a coupled cluster calculation is more complex than the choice of determinants in a Cl. Like Cl, there are various orders of the CC expansion, called CCSD, CCSDT, and so on. A calculation denoted CCSD(T) is one in which the triple excitations are included perturbatively rather than exactly. 

Cartesian coordinates system for locating points in space based on three coordinates, which are usually given the symbols x, y, z or i, j, k CBS (complete basis set) an ah initio method CC (coupled cluster) a correlated ah initio method CFF (consistent force field) a class of molecular mechanics force fields CFMM (continuous fast multipole method) a method for fast DFT calculations on large molecules... 

In the RISM-SCF theory, the statistical solvent distribution around the solute is determined by the electronic structure of the solute, whereas the electronic strucmre of the solute is influenced by the surrounding solvent distribution. Therefore, the ab initio MO calculation and the RISM equation must be solved in a self-consistent manner. It is noted that SCF (self-consistent field) applies not only to the electronic structure calculation but to the whole system, e.g., a self-consistent treatment of electronic structure and solvent distribution. The MO part of the method can be readily extended to the more sophisticated levels beyond Hartree-Fock (HF), such as configuration interaction (Cl) and coupled cluster (CC). 

The QCISD method is also very closely related to coupled cluster theory, with singles and doubles (CCSD). In contrast to QCISD. 

There are three main methods for calculating electron correlation Configuration Interaction (Cl), Many Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT) and Coupled Cluster (CC). A word of caution before we describe these methods in more details. The Slater determinants are composed of spin-MOs, but since the Hamilton operator is independent of spin, the spin dependence can be factored out. Furthermore, to facilitate notation, it is often assumed that the HF determinant is of the RHF type. Finally, many of the expressions below involve double summations over identical sets of functions. To ensure only the unique terms are included, one of the summation indices must be restricted. Alternatively, both indices can be allowed to run over all values, and the overcounting corrected by a factor of 1/2. Various combinations of these assumptions result in final expressions which differ by factors of 1 /2, 1/4 etc. from those given here. In the present book the MOs are always spin-MOs, and conversion of a restricted summation to an unrestricted is always noted explicitly. 

Perturbation methods add all types of corrections (S, D, T, Q etc.) to the reference wave function to a given order (2, 3, 4 etc.). The idea in Coupled Cluster (CC) methods is to include all corrections of a given type to infinite order. The (intermediate normalized) coupled cluster wave function is written as... 

In the above the coupled cluster equations have been derived by multiplying the Schrddinger equation with ( o. and An alternative way of deriving the... 

Since the singly excited determinants effectively relax the orbitals in a CCSD calculation, non-canonical HF orbitals can also be used in coupled cluster methods. This allows for example the use of open-shell singlet states (which require two Slater determinants) as reference for a coupled cluster calculation. 

The above is an example of how direct algorithms may be formulated for methods involving electron correlation. It illustrates that it is not as straightforward to apply direct methods at the correlated level as at the SCF level. However, the steady increase in CPU performance, and especially the evolution of multiprocessor machines, favours direct (and semi-direct where some intermediate results are stored on disk) algorithms. Recently direct methods have also been implemented at the coupled cluster level. 

The only generally applicable methods are CISD, MP2, MP3, MP4, CCSD and CCSD(T). CISD is variational, but not size extensive, while MP and CC methods are non-variational but size extensive. CISD and MP are in principle non-iterative methods, although the matrix diagonalization involved in CISD usually is so large that it has to be done iteratively. Solution of the coupled cluster equations must be done by an iterative technique since the parameters enter in a non-linear fashion. In terms of the most expensive step in each of the methods they may be classified according to how they formally scale in the large system limit, as shown in Table 4.5. 

The use of Cl methods has been declining in recent years, to the profit of MP and especially CC methods. It is now recognized that size extensivity is important for obtaining accurate results. Excited states, however, are somewhat difficult to treat by perturbation or coupled cluster methods, and Cl or MCSCF based methods have been the prefen ed methods here. More recently propagator or equation of motion (Section 10.9) methods have been developed for coupled cluster wave functions, which allows calculation of exited state properties. 

More recently Equation Of Motion (EOM) methods have been used in connection with other types of wave functions, most notably coupled cluster.Such EOM methods are closely related to propagator methods, and give working equations which are similar to those encountered in propagator theory. 

The spin contamination makes the UCC energy curves somewhat too high in the intermediate region, but the infinite nature of coupled cluster methods makes them significantly better at removing unwanted spin states as compared to UMPu methods (Figure 11.8). 

Testing the sensitivity towards increases in electron correlation beyond MP2, for example by coupled cluster or MP4 calculations. 

---