Interaction calculation

Taking into account only nearest-neighbor interactions, calculate the value for the line or edge tension k for solid argon at 0 K. The units of k should be in ergs per centimeter. 

HyperChem always com putes the electron ic properties for the molecule as the last step of a geometry optimization or molecular dyn am ics calcu lation. However, if you would like to perform a configuration interaction calculation at the optimized geometry, an additional sin gle poin t calcu lation is requ ired with theCI option being turned on. 

The amount of computation for MP2 is determined by the partial tran si ormatioii of the two-electron integrals, what can be done in a time proportionally to m (m is the u umber of basis functions), which IS comparable to computations involved m one step of(iID (doubly-excitcil eon figuration interaction) calculation. fo save some computer time and space, the core orbitals are frequently omitted from MP calculations. For more details on perturbation theory please see A. S/abo and N. Ostlund, Modem Quantum (. hern-isir > Macmillan, Xew York, 198.5. 

The configuration interaction calculation with all possible excitations is called a full Cl. The full Cl calculation using an infinitely large basis set will give an exact quantum mechanical result. However, full Cl calculations are very rarely done due to the immense amount of computer power required. 

Coupled cluster calculations are similar to conhguration interaction calculations in that the wave function is a linear combination of many determinants. However, the means for choosing the determinants in a coupled cluster calculation is more complex than the choice of determinants in a Cl. Like Cl, there are various orders of the CC expansion, called CCSD, CCSDT, and so on. A calculation denoted CCSD(T) is one in which the triple excitations are included perturbatively rather than exactly. 

A configuration interaction calculation uses molecular orbitals that have been optimized typically with a Hartree-Fock (FIF) calculation. Generalized valence bond (GVB) and multi-configuration self-consistent field (MCSCF) calculations can also be used as a starting point for a configuration interaction calculation. 

For conhguration interaction calculations of double excitations or higher, it is possible to solve the Cl super-matrix for the 2nd root, 3rd root, 4th root, and so on. This is a very reliable way to obtain a high-quality wave function for the hrst few excited states. For higher excited states, CPU times become very large since more iterations are generally needed to converge the Cl calculation. This can be done also with MCSCF calculations. 

You can choose to calculate all nonbonded interactions or to truncate (cut off) the nonbonded interaction calculations using a switched or shifted function. Computing time for molecular mechanics calculations is largely a function of the number of nonbonded interactions, so truncating nonbonded interactions reduces computing time. You must also truncate nonbonded interactions for periodic boundary conditions to prevent interaction problems between nearest neighbor images. 

A configuration interaction calculation is available only for single points when the reference ground state is obtained from an RHF calculation. 

A CASSCF calculation is a combination of an SCF computation with a full Configuration Interaction calculation involving a subset of the orbitals. The orbitals involved in the Cl are known as the active space. In this way, the CASSCF method optimizes the orbitals appropriately for the excited state. In contrast, the Cl-Singles method uses SCF orbitals for the excited state. Since Hartree-Fock orbitals are biased toward the ground state, a CASSCF description of the excited state electronic configuration is often an improvement. 

The next step might be to perform a configuration interaction calculation, in order to get a more accurate representation of the excited states. We touched on this for dihydrogen in an earlier chapter. To do this, we take linear combinations of the 10 states given above, and solve a 10 x 10 matrix eigenvalue problem to find the expansion coefficients. The diagonal elements of the Hamiltonian matrix are given above (equation 8.7), and it turns out that there is a simplification. 

To taike advantage of procedures used for configuration interaction calculations, eigenvalues of the symmetrized matrices, H -I- H, are computed. 

Configuration interaction calculations (3, 4) indicate a possible existence of systems belonging to the second group of our classification (triplets). Although these systems have an even number of electrons and no degenerate... 

The asymptotic energy values obtained by a configuration interaction calculation at 25 a.u. corrected by the coulombic repulsion term (the l/R" term has been neglected) are seen to be in quite good agreement with experiment (Table 3). 

Vilkas, M.J., Ishikawa, Y. and Koc, K. (1998) Quadratically convergent multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock and multireference relativistic configuration-interaction calculations for many-electron systems. Physical Review E, 58, 5096-5110. 

Gianinetti, E., Raimondi, M. and Tomaghi, E. (1996) Modification of the Roothaan equations to exclude BSSE from molecular interaction calculations, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 60, 157-166. 

Table 6-3. Comparison of the dipoles of the isolated individual monomers (dipole M) compare to the dipole moments of molecules within the dimer (dipole D) via the interaction, calculated with different functionals. Units are atomic units, and we give as well the difference in length and orientation ...

Ab initio DDCI2 (difference-dedicated configuration interaction) calculations seem to provide accurate estimations of the magnetic exchange coupling constants, as demonstrated for the doubly azido-bridged nickel(II) dimer [Ni2(terpy)2(/i-l,l-N3)2]2+.2133... 

The configuration interaction calculations using the PNA singlet excited states (4.2, 4 37, 4.38, 5.57,... 

---