Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Control Structure CS

Control stmcture CSIAO dynamically departs the furthest for both bottom and top product compositions from their specifications for the +10% feed water composition change. Control structure CSIQA dynamically departs the furthest for the -10% feed water composition change. In terms of the final steady-state value, control structure CS IQO gives the largest departure in bottom product purity (see Fig. 9.16). The CS IQO control structure keeps the aqueous reflux flowrate fixed during the dynamic runs. The ability to adjust the aqueous... [Pg.266]

Gu RR, Lohnes RA, Choor SM, Cheong CS (2001) Use of scrap tires in stream grade control structures. Report to Golden HiUs Resources Conservation and Development, Inc., Oakland, lA... [Pg.213]

It should be noted that in addition to changes in K2NbF7 or K2TaF7 concentrations that afford control over the complex structure and electrolysis parameters, the cation type also affects the equilibrium between the complex ions. The heptacoordinated complexes become increasingly dominant when progressing along the cation series from Li to Cs. [Pg.326]

The pore size of Cs2.2 and Cs2.1 cannot be determined by the N2 adsorption, so that their pore sizes were estimated from the adsorption of molecules having different molecular size. Table 3 compares the adsorption capacities of Csx for various molecules measured by a microbalance connected directly to an ultrahigh vacuum system [18]. As for the adsorption of benzene (kinetic diameter = 5.9 A [25]) and neopentane (kinetic diameter = 6.2 A [25]), the ratios of the adsorption capacity between Cs2.2 and Cs2.5 were similar to the ratio for N2 adsorption. Of interest are the results of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (kinetic diameter = 7.5 A [25]) and triisopropylbenzene (kinetic diameter = 8.5 A [25]). Both adsorbed significantly on Cs2.5, but httle on Cs2.2, indicating that the pore size of Cs2.2 is in the range of 6.2 -7.5 A and that of Cs2.5 is larger than 8.5 A in diameter. In the case of Cs2.1, both benzene and neopentane adsorbed only a little. Hence the pore size of Cs2.1 is less than 5.9 A. These results demonstrate that the pore structure can be controlled by the substitution for H+ by Cs+. [Pg.587]

The decision-making engine in the CS is the set of classifier condition-action rules therefore, the key to a successful application is a well-constructed set of rules. If the control problem is straightforward, the necessary classifiers could, in principle, be created by hand, but there is rarely much point in doing this. A single classifier is equivalent to a production rule, the same structures that form the basis of most expert systems if a set of classifiers that could adequately control the environment could be created by hand, it would probably be as easy to create an equivalent expert system (ES). As an ES is able to explain its actions but a CS is not, in these circumstances, an ES would be preferable. [Pg.279]

Crystal structure modification, in smart materials, 22 707 CS (riot control agent), 5 823-824 CS2, formation in the Claus furnace, 23 605. See also Carbon disulfide C-scan images, 17 424, 429 Cs isotopes, decay of, 21 303-304. [Pg.237]

K+ channels selectively transport K+ across membranes, hyperpolarize cells, set membrane potentials and control the duration of action potentials, among a myriad of other functions. They use diverse forms of gating, but they all have very similar ion permeabilities. All K+ channels show a selectivity sequence of K+ Rb+ > Cs+, whereas the transport of the smallest alkali metal ions Na+ and Li+ is very slow—typically the permeability for K+ is at least 104 that of Na+. The determination of the X-ray structure of the K+-ion channel has allowed us to understand how it selectively filters completely dehydrated K+ ions, but not the smaller Na+ ions. Not only does this molecular filter select the ions to be transported, but also the electrostatic repulsion between K+ ions, which pass through this molecular filter in Indian file, provides the force to drive the K+ ions rapidly through the channel at a rate of 107-108 per second. (Reviewed in Doyle et al., 1998 MacKinnon, 2004.)... [Pg.153]

In a very broad overview of the structural categories one can state several statistical correlations with type of function. Hemes are almost always bound by helices, but never in parallel a//3 structures. Relatively complex enzymatic functions, especially those involving allosteric control, are occasionally antiparallel /3 but most often parallel a//3. Binding and receptor proteins are most often antiparallel /3, while the proteins that bind in those receptor sites (i.e., hormones, toxins, and enzyme inhibitors) are most apt to be small disulfide-rich structures. However, there are exceptions to all of the above generalizations (such as cytochrome cs as a nonhelical heme protein or citrate synthase as a helical enzyme), and when one focuses on the really significant level of detail within the active site then the correlation with overall tertiary structure disappears altogether. For almost all of the dozen identifiable groups of functionally similar proteins that are represented by at least two known protein structures, there are at least... [Pg.318]

Tanaka296 found the relative rates of oxidation of cycloalkanes by Co(III) acetate in acetic acid at 90°C to decrease in the order Cs >C6 > C7-Ci2. He concluded that the rate-controlling step did not involve C—H bond rupture but, instead, formation of a complex between the alkane and Co(III). The relative reactivities were attributed to steric hindrance in the formation of the complex, the structural features of which were not elaborated further. [Pg.324]


See other pages where Control Structure CS is mentioned: [Pg.112]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.87]   


SEARCH



Cs , structure

Structural control

Structural controllability

© 2024 chempedia.info